Revan-the-knight Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 There are many reasons you and all lovers of Hutt ball are wrong. And while I have no problem with people wanting to play hutt ball I myself dont want to it ruins the whole atmosphere for me has no place in the star wars universe, I just wish if you really want to play hutt ball make it separate from the rest so subscription holders have a choice. We want the Hutts Assistance, in order to get some extra Cred for the War effort we have to participate in their blood sports, Sounds pretty damn Hutt to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newwb Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 i hate delaware Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejected Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 I hated huttball on my scoundrel, but I freaking love it as a KC shadow. It's the only warzone where I am useful until I get more gear. (Being a fresh 50 is rather unfair, even if I planned ahead and already had my WH double bladed saber and recruit gear ready for when I hit 50.) No matter how geared a person is, nor how experienced, if you pull their *** into the fire they die just like everyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dystopic Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Honestly, I'd prefer to just play hutball. Voidstar sucks, civil war is an easy win but boring. Republic never loses, ever. Novarre coast is just annoying, especially since people still have not figured out how the damn terminals work. So yeah, hutball only please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varicite Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Honestly, I'd prefer to just play hutball. Voidstar sucks, civil war is an easy win but boring. Republic never loses, ever. Novarre coast is just annoying, especially since people still have not figured out how the damn terminals work. So yeah, hutball only please. I could live w/ this. I love Huttball on every class so far, even the Sniper. : ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brewergamer Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 In my opinion all they really need to do is just add another warzone that allows same faction PvP and it would be fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UGLYMRJ Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Like huttball but still agree the options should be there. And I believe that they've said they plan on implementing it at some point soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dencre Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Usually the people that hate huttball are the ones that have no clue how to play it. It is actually a ton o fun. There is a huttball guide around here on the pvp forums that gives some great tips. I LOVE HUTTBALL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macabrae Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 (edited) On behalf of no one in particular, I would request that you developers find some way for us to screen the PvP warzones so that we can opt OUT of Huttball. Hate it. HAAAATTTEEE it. Take a page from Rift, let us pick what PvP warzones we want to play. Well ya know what they say about opinions cause I love Huttball. I love it cause its different and not your normal type BG.... Edited June 25, 2012 by Macabrae Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaybek Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 WTB more Huttball. Worst thing about 1.2 was how little we get to play Huttball now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sauerkraut Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Boo hoo hoo!!! Rebs can't just stand in formation, heal, interrupt and throw rocks. They actually have to move and try to hit moving targets, that must be frustrating. L2P! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezzie Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 I want to kick the ball. You know you've pvp'd too much when my first thought in the morning is "These are the rules of Huttball" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShawnFish Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 No - YOU hate huttball - I do not Case closed - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheronFett Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 (edited) I like Huttball. But it definitely sucks when you have clueless baddies on your team...which makes Huttball extremely frustrating. More so than other maps. On the bright side though, getting rolled takes the least amount of time, so at least the pain doesn't last as long. However, I do like the idea of a warzone checklist so that we can select which ones we do/don't want to queue for. Personally, I'd never like to see Voidstar again. Edited June 25, 2012 by TheronFett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FourTwent Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 we dont hate huttball. but i wouldn't protest against a feature that lets us pick a warzone. but if that does happen I think it would create pre-made team compositions that would dominate that warzone. which would suck for anyone pug put into that warzone against them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astarica Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 we dont hate huttball. but i wouldn't protest against a feature that lets us pick a warzone. but if that does happen I think it would create pre-made team compositions that would dominate that warzone. which would suck for anyone pug put into that warzone against them There are quite a few times I have easy wins against premades that seem to be clearly designed for Huttball except the map wasn't Huttball. It wouldn't be fair to avoid the risk of having a certain Huttball (or any other map specific) team without having to put up with the risk you might get steamrolled when not on the map you're designed for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingcain Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 /signed or just give us an option which warzones we wanted to join:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetalHed Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 /signed *CLICK* (short pause) "Ah...not Huttball again!!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthOvertone Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 I'm actually a huge fan of the Huttball WZ. It's one of my favorites. However, when I'm PUGging it up, I hate to see this WZ appear on my screen. A WZ queue filter is long overdue in this regard. Love playing Huttball with my Guildies. Despise playing Huttball with PUGs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smuglebunny Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Huttball is the most liked warzone. The only thing I can think is, you dont like it cuz you arent good at it. Cuz why would someone dislike something they are good at? LOL. Cur'ai Mowar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfmith Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 I love it. I'd play it over every other WZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astarica Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 I'm actually a huge fan of the Huttball WZ. It's one of my favorites. However, when I'm PUGging it up, I hate to see this WZ appear on my screen. A WZ queue filter is long overdue in this regard. Love playing Huttball with my Guildies. Despise playing Huttball with PUGs. Honestly a bad PUG in Huttball would still be pretty bad everywhere else. I like Huttball even on bad teams because you've control on earning your medals or even ending the game quickly even when badly outclassed, while in the other 3 WZs you usually do not. For example if you're thoroughly outclassed in Alderaan but the enemy decide to play safe the game will always end in a 300-0 and you can't speed that up. In Huttball you can actively create situations to lose faster once you get your 8 medals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth_Philar Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 (edited) Just as an FYI, Huttball is by far the single most popular warzone (it received more #1 votes than all other maps combined in my ranking thread). If we allow people to specifically choose which warzone they want to queue for you are going to see even more Huttball matches and even less of the others (meaning you people who hate Huttball may not even be able to find games or at least will have to wait over an hour for a queue to pop). Edited June 25, 2012 by Darth_Philar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
criminalheretic Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 I hate Huttball AND think it is probably the best WZ there is. I think it is the best because it requires the most strategy, and teamwork. I hate it because I am a Marauder. We suck as ball carriers, with the exception of the final push to score, i.e. force leap and UR. Our best utility is sweet to rush up to mid at the start, but that's the only time we can really count on Predation. So basically our most useful skill in Huttball is our most useful skill everywhere else, killing people. We are mid-fielders. Keeping people away from mid is important, I'm not discounting that, the problem is there is another class who is really only good for guarding mid, snipers. They just sit there up above you sniping you all day, you can't jump up to them, you run six blocks to get and someone that's 10ft above you, and then they knock you into the pit, and keep shooting you till you run out of range. Makes me wanna pull my hair out. Not saying it is "unfair", just hugely annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
criminalheretic Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Honestly a bad PUG in Huttball would still be pretty bad everywhere else. I like Huttball even on bad teams because you've control on earning your medals or even ending the game quickly even when badly outclassed, while in the other 3 WZs you usually do not. For example if you're thoroughly outclassed in Alderaan but the enemy decide to play safe the game will always end in a 300-0 and you can't speed that up. In Huttball you can actively create situations to lose faster once you get your 8 medals. Please don't "actively create situations to lose faster once you get your 8 medals" without first clearing it with the rest of your team. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts