I would be happy with more colors. Consider the palette offered in KOTOR 2.

Or pvp.

Having defensive targeting a la Warhammer online would be nice too.

Because I had hell of a time killing a single self healing normal mob on tatooine as a Def.

I actually tried Mandalorian raiders with a group which included a couple of people lvl 21-22. Just prior I respecced to vigilance and when doing the instance found myself absolutely unable to hold aggro. Mobs invariably attacked my lower level companions despite my aoe. It's possible the ******* gunslinger aoed them but the lvl 22 sage was had also. My question is is it something I am not doing or is it because of their low level. Oh, and taunt was mysteriously greyed out.

This has been argued before and this argument remains incorrect. If you wish to know what I mean, consider earlier threads. In any case, if the warhammer online forums are any indication, bioware considers class and general forums steam vents and nothing more.

Another thing I think should be changed is the 10-50 scenarios. At least separate them in 2 groups, 10-30 and 30-50. 50s should not be competing agains lvl 20s.

Personally, I would like to see all of the colors included in KOTOR 2. I want my silver sabre.

Their mechanics have nothing in common. And on top of that, the marauders are overpowered beasts; you probably didn't play WHO for a while.

And it took far longer than it should have. They are of course the ironbreakers/black guards of warhammer online. And when you look at those classes you appreciate the deficiency of the knights a little more clearly. The class really should have had secondary bonuses attached to it's skills depending on its level of power, same as those other classes.

Of the stuff I experienced in the game, my #1 complaint is the inconceivable lack of stun immunity in pvp. This company has had 3 years worth of Warhammer players screaming at them about this stuff and here it is again, like they never oversaw a pvp game. Incredible.

I don't understand this skill's value particularly in the light of the fact that it's use is recommended at all times. Is it the 5% accuracy debuff?

I have never tried WOW. My previous forays into mmo gaming were the DAOC and Warhammer Online, both pvp-centric and arguably hard-core, particularly the first. I am loving this game so far. My greatest complaint is that there is no difference in terms of classes btw Empire and Reps which makes the game blander but does cut down on the whinefest. Another issue I see is that as yet I have not observed a tangible reward from pvp a la realm abilities. But in terms of progression it has been so enjoyable that the above mentioned stuff doesn't bother. Of course, after I have experienced the story lines of enough classes and only want to pvp (i hate grinding pve) I might lose interest in this game but with any luck they will expand on that aspect of the game. I do have a question, how hardcore is WoW, in truth? Because compared to the games I played, it seems not at all. And strangely enough, it suceeded.

Don't know what the op is talking about. My knight carries the sabre in the style of a katana user aka samurai.

That's not elitism (nothing wrong with elitism if it's deserved). This is just an example of childish egocentrism of which these boards have been rife with in the 1+ day of their operation.

Oh the humanity! And its future!

Bioware really should have expected this and enabled realm-specific brakes they could use to keep one side from outnumbering the other too much on any server.

Incidentally, I got my Naga at Best Buy for less than Newegg.