I'm sure you mean weapon since OPs don't use sabers. Buy either your blaster rifle or the vibroknife. You get the spike in expterise and supporting stats whic makes a noticeable impact.

No you are missing my point. You want to play single player but with a bunch of other single players and call it a group. You want to play free from the need for coordination and team-work in order to reach some nebulous standard of "fairness" for yourself. Queue up to gear up. Find someone decent that you play well with? Make a friend! But don't ask to be segregated based on your "playstyle". That's a selfish way of thinking in a game type that is supposed to promote community.

So you're looking to play single player..........against other single players........in an mmo?

Do you complain when you solo queue and end up with a solid 4 man premade and win? I'll bet $1 million credits you don't. So not only is your "request" deslusional, but it's hypocritical as well.

The 1.3-1.7 captured includes free trials. It's amazing, how the president of EA can tell the players the game they like isn't important and people actually defend the product. Wake up guys, the game MAY have been a success but those days are fleeting.

Your idea can be found here

At least you're getting queues man.

I want full Rakata and Black Hole gear from NPC drops on Alderaan. I want to start off with a maxed out ship because the Republic/Empire would never undergear their fighters. There should be only one license for vehicles and they should all go the same speed.

People are bored man. you can't rollback experience in playing. After doing a "daily" for the 30th time, running a WZ for the 1000th time, finishing your 5th level 50, etc things just get old.

You can't walk into a strip club and complain about all the naked women. The choice was to create a toon and play on a Player versus Player server where the logic allows for players to fight one another at most levels and in certain areas. You have no room to complain now. Strap your digital dog to your digital roof and take your ideologies, lovely wife, and sweet little 8yr old girl to a PVE server where you fit best.

So pvp happened on a pvp server and you want players to be penalized?

Intredasting......

1.3 was not "revealed". Fail thread and fail interview.

The complete lack of action by the development team to correct minor issues. The over-promise and under-deliver style of marketing with patch notes game updates. The crass manner in which the developers have mocked their own subscriber base, lashing out with conceptions holding no merit. Players tiring of the gameplay. The term "daily" in itself suggests a grind which is time-gated, redundant, and bares no real meaning. Lack of ingame support tools such as persistant pvp groups, player based economical structure, world player versus player events etc. I could go on, but I have to check to make sure the stop payment went through on my last subscription fee. BioWare doesn't deserve to be paid attention let alone $15 for there follies.

It is about 1v1. 2 v 1 is a redundant argument 3 v 1 is not even worth discussing Your ability to damage, absorb, or heal versus another class is what people notice the most. When your argument is "bring a friend" you are invalidating your argument of superiority.

So you don't have time to because of irl things to get the neccessary gear. But you do have the time to grind up a level 50 with the intention of griefing 1 person with your incompetency? I swear some people cut off their nose to spite their own face at times and seem happy to do so.

Plenty of vaguery in your response here. Way to prep us JG!

Well it did get moved from the PVP Discussion forum to this small corner of the forum. Where people try to post interesting things and not simply complain. I'd love it if they were looking at my character right now and who I normally group with to see if they can take us. In a perfect world, they accept the challenge, fight alongside players and against other developers and use their expereience there as a means to modify areas of the game. But I will settle for gauging whether or not they are able to display their knowledge in a tangible sense by playing the game competently. Someone equated them to coaches which means they SHOULD have difficulty. But they are the ones telling the players to learn to play. The question I want to ask is "have they learned to play?".

Over 1000 views. I wonder how many of them belong to devs. Let me be the first to say I am not the best, but I am betting their only competency on the game, it's mechanics, and pvp are theory based and from reports they read.

So I take it your vote is no? Your analogy is flawed. You're acquiescing to the prospect that the developers are not as good or better at a game they created than the players they are supposed to support (yet run down every chance they get). I'm saying I don't think they are good, but I want to be proven wrong.

This is the community's theory, but I want someone with the stones to step up and prove us wrong. You can show some fire and passion about your product and not put the players down. What developer would you like to see step in and mix it up?

I want Zoeller and Ohlen in on this and I'd love to see their feedback after the game(s). These guys have thrown their own customers under the bus and sounded almost crass in the action. I want to know if they play and if they are any good. That's 7 votes in favor.

Scenario: Players and developers select their class, point allocation, and gear. Each team consists of 4 developers / 4 players on each side. WZ scenarios are completely random. Stream all 3 matches and allow commentary through twitter. Result: Players grade (observed) developer knowledge and skill set as teammates and opponents. Developers give LIVE feedback of their experience to the players. Vote: (Yes/No) Which of the developers would you like to see in the field?

I have a suggestion that might add more consistency to PVP que'ing. Has any thought been given to changing WarZone ques to go off in 15 minute intervals? My Idea: Huttball is a super original concept and while some classes feel less utile in this particular warxone, it would make sense to have a new game beginning @ 00:00 - 00:15 - 00:30 - 00:45 of every hour. Alderaan Civil War is another great zone and could legitimately remain randomized or reserved as a "special" warzone given the nature of server balance at the moment. Voidstar/Novare Coast both have good concepts with a few issues with mechanics, but because they have been modified to allow same faction play could also go on a residual cycle grabbing que'd players for entry into the game at 30 minute intervals. A standard cycle of ques where players have a "defacto" means of playing the games they like is now introduced into the system as well as a means to avoid frustrating periods of 0 ques for hour long periods. As well you would be introducing a means of allowing potentially smaller teams of organized players to still be able to play with < 5 players. Consistency builds trust. Thoughts?

I don't understand what you're saying. You canot be kicked for insuboordination. You have to be afk or you may have disconnected.