They have already said that they plan on doing so. The armoring from endgame stuff will be a bit restrictive so you can't say farm the gloves of a set over and over and pull the armoring to place in every slot.

It has happened to me on two different characters. Further attempts on the same characters had no issues.

Those points change depending on how many people are in the conversation. If you lose you get 1 point per person in the conversation, and you get 2 points per person if you win.

You could still help out by going into his phase. It is just like how you go into the storyline for a different class even though it has nothing to do with your story.

I was a bit worried about that, but my worries went out the door once I got one and started using it. Unless you have a really big thumb, you shouldn't have any issues with the buttons.

Yes, you can't enter a spaceship if you don't own your own.

Supposedly more are planned so that is where the 5 comes from.

I didn't get it either and I went the lightside route with Jadus.

The first tier is broken for Agents/Smugglers and doesn't give a cunning option.

Two pieces of armor with the same armor value, will provide the same protection, no matter the quality, level, etc of the item. Now, when you look at an armor you will see two numbers. The armor value and then in parenthesis the armor rating. The value is the one you want to look at. The rating just determines what the value is based on the type of armor. So light armor and medium armor with the same rating will have a different value (with the medium being higher). As for orange armor, it's armor rating (and therefore armor value) is determined by the armoring modification. Whatever rating the armoring mod gives is the rating the armor will have.

There is not. Hopefully they will add it in the future.

I didn't feel bad. Might have to do with the fact that I had a Joiner as a companion.

It didn't for me. At least not for Temple. I was in the middle of the Temple romance when I got to that part. I even got affection points during the course of it.

I know I played through the conversation in Act 2 in several different times. It was when I started to worry that something was screwed up with the romance because she never brought it up herself and I didn't see an option to bring it. I could have missed something though.

Depending on how things goes, there are 3 endings. You kill, you get into a short cutscene fight where he ends up in the room with the guns and dies, or he lives. He shows up later for the last one.

I didn't romance Kaliyo. Eventually I gave up since no one else seem to know anything about whether the romance continued post act 1 and romanced Temple (once I was on Voss). I'm guessing it is either bugged or removed. I don't think her telling you her real name is directly related to the romance, since I was able to get that line during the end of act 3.

No, IA use vibroknives not techblades. Speaking of IAs, their final companion is in the same boot (though also can use techstaffs).

Is the Watcher 2 romance supposed to continue past act 1? After Act 1, she seems to never mention what happened and all flirt options are gone (outside of one in Act 3). Or is it bugged?

If you see the icon pop up, click on them. If they actually want to talk, they will say so, otherwise ignore it as it will go away shortly.

I agree.

At least one class has more romance for their male versions. Male IAs have 2 companions they can romance.

If you are talking about the ship droid, then no, you can't raise it's affection. If you mean a real companion, then yes, you can raise affection normally just like any humanoid companion.

I know you can. I'm just wondering if it bugged after act 1, I screwed something up, or if it just gets dropped after that with no mention of it ever and no more flirt options. I'm in Act 3, and since then I have had nothing with Watcher 2 even though at least once TORhead shows that there should be a flirt option where I didn't have one.

Anyone know? I know this was discussed on the beta versions of this forums, but details were vague.

I suggest reading the other responses in this thread.