This is the strangest post I've seen in a while. Do people even proof read before hitting submit anymore?
I was teased yesterday btw. I expect to be informed later this month.
They've seen the small turret (reward from Collicoid wargames). The massive one from EC NiM cannot presently be sold via the GTN. Neither can the other 'NiM final boss' deco drops (reconstructed hypergate, burning skull statue, Oriconian warrior statue etc).
It needs fixing asap imo.
While you're at it could you please include the 2 mounts from the fleet vendor.
Both the Rendili Watchman and the Ubbrikkian Hunter mounts won't add to the decoration list.
Thank you
EDIT: Just noticed your use of the past tense...any chance you could pass along the above mount issue anyway?
You type with your tongue?
Then, pray tell, what are you doing with your fingers in the meantime?
EDIT: It made sense in my head...sadly it's less clear in written form.
KDY has a reputation linked to it. Also the KDY drops to get the mount.
Tython/Korriban have recovered relics for the deco. Also there are the 2 rare mount drops (very, very rare).
Manaan has drops needed to buy the mount.
The Rakata tactical is the only one which doesn't give any reason to replay it more than 1-5 times.
I saw all 3 Rakata drops yesterday and I only ran it twice.
It is an easy, beautiful FP but the rewards (replay value) are terrible. Especially when compared to the previous 4 tactical flashpoints.
I have 28 animal mounts. The walkers also count towards the NPC limit and I have two of those. I have 170 pets. I have 44 companions and every single decoration NPC added with 2.9.
I have over 250 in total...and the cap is 25?
So yes, I'd love to see your idea be implemented. I have no clue what resources are needed to do so but the '25 limit' is a huge bottleneck to decorating.
Problem solved!
Seriously, adding a 'ignore stronghold' option would mean you'd only ever enter a 'conquest SH' once. Actually a simple and elegant solution imo.
P.S. Why do people intentionally open up their SH's to the public when it's clear it's being used solely to bump up the conquest bonus? The default setting is private...they intentionally make them public...let them be 'ignored' I say.
I placed 1675 items in my 4 strongholds (500 Tat, 475 NS, 350 each for DK and Coruscant). Each SH gives a maximum bonus of 25% (x4 = 100%).
Now for each conquest objective I get double the original amount (pre invasion bonus of course).
Thanks mate.
While you're at it I'll take a guild invite, a gold flagship key and an unsupervised hour spent in your guild bank
The Red Eclipse - Jamus Divinus (for the invite, key and GB permissions)
The player ship models we can place in Strongholds are about half size (Fury, Phantom, Defender etc). After donating one to the guild to place in the flagship does it become fullsize once placed in the flagship hangar? Or is it like my Tatooine ones (50% smaller than the original).
Thanks in advance.
Slightly offtopic but in over 100 GSF matches I've done since conquests were introduced i've yet to see one game where player harakiri was rife. Not one. Could it be that we just have a 'superior' playerbase on The Red Eclipse?
Ok, maybe not.
We have 20 players and we came 9th on Ilum last week.
It's possible but requires a truckload more 'work' per member than those guilds where 35k each will do