Severianz Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 HUTTBALL HUTTBALL HUTTBALL HUTTBALL HUTTBALL This is not PvP. This is not worth $15 a month. This is not quality work. If this is the best the devs can do, I'm not impressed. EVERY other major MMO, past and present, has had more than 1 playable PvP Warzone/battlezone/battleground. This is a complete and utter failure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CorruptJudge Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 (edited) https://account.swtor.com/user/subscription/cancel Edited January 19, 2012 by CorruptJudge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taurusaud Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 But... but this is the "crowning achievement on the history of innovative mmos"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Araahaiel Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 I personally find hutball fun and there is more than one PVP zone etc. Huttball is more engaging than typical capture the flag games. Sorry you hate it so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red_Cruiser Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Two words. ROLL REPUBLIC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severianz Posted January 19, 2012 Author Share Posted January 19, 2012 I don't hate Huttball - I have played 10 warzones.. all Huttball. No variety. None. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brodsk Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 https://account.swtor.com/user/subscription/cancel Make sure you delete your credit card info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremybtg Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 I like hutt ball as well. /disagree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rathy Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Bioware could have done what every other MMO did in the past, and not include a same faction warzone(Since that usually spawns the endless huttball). Huttball is meant to make sure you can queue regardless of the imblance. Without it, it would be like every other game, where in this case Imperials have a 30 minute queue time, and Republic queues instantly. And then there would be complaints on that too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazorous Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 HUTTBALL HUTTBALL HUTTBALL HUTTBALL HUTTBALL This is not PvP. This is not worth $15 a month. This is not quality work. If this is the best the devs can do, I'm not impressed. EVERY other major MMO, past and present, has had more than 1 playable PvP Warzone/battlezone/battleground. This is a complete and utter failure. There are more warzones than Huttball. Do you even know why you're getting Huttball? Do you realize you're on a faction that is way over populated? Until you realize this, you probably won't realize that the issue is within you, and not the Devs for this particular incident. And they did announce they will eventually open up the ability to queue for specific warzones. But again, until you understand why you're getting Huttball all the time, then you will probably QQ about massive queues, waiting on a different warzone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremybtg Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 I don't hate Huttball - I have played 10 warzones.. all Huttball. No variety. None. That's dependant on how many people are queing up from the opposing faction. I love huttball because it's faction vs faction and drastically lowers the que time. They already announced another faction vs faction warzone coming soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severianz Posted January 19, 2012 Author Share Posted January 19, 2012 Who cares if the population is unbalanced. Have Imps vs. Imps on the other Warzones. Why limit it to Huttball. Yes, I know why I'm getting Huttball Only. No, I don't hate Huttball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremybtg Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Who cares if the population is unbalanced. Have Imps vs. Imps on the other Warzones. Why limit it to Huttball. Yes, I know why I'm getting Huttball Only. No, I don't hate Huttball. They limited the other warzones because the other warzones don't make sense to have imperials fighting imperials and vice versa. And yes, they care about making sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severianz Posted January 19, 2012 Author Share Posted January 19, 2012 They limited the other warzones because the other warzones don't make sense to have imperials fighting imperials and vice versa. And yes, they care about making sense. No. They. Don't. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellisande Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Of the 3 warzones I find Huttball to be the most balanced, followed very closely by Alderaan with Voidstar way at the other end of the spectrum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremybtg Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 No. They. Don't. Lol. Right....anyways, I gave you the answers, I'm sorry you don't like them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IGsChevy Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 This is a "story-driven" MMO, which means certain design choices (like the basis for the PvP warzones) must have a credible story basis. Imperials fighting each other over a datacore doesn't make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desertwolph Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 I love hutball, please give it to me every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monjiay Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 There are more warzones than Huttball. Do you even know why you're getting Huttball? Do you realize you're on a faction that is way over populated? Until you realize this, you probably won't realize that the issue is within you, and not the Devs for this particular incident. And they did announce they will eventually open up the ability to queue for specific warzones. But again, until you understand why you're getting Huttball all the time, then you will probably QQ about massive queues, waiting on a different warzone. They could have just as easily made ALL of the warzones be playable with one faction just like Huttball. It's not rocket science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severianz Posted January 19, 2012 Author Share Posted January 19, 2012 Sure it does. As Malgus tried to create his own Imperial Empire and establish himself as the new emperor... You can have Imps vs. Imps trying to get the same technology. Then on Alderaan it's CIVIL war meaning the houses could hire Imps & Sith to oppose eachother. It's all right there. Your arguments are stretched defending poor development choices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coriolan_Martius Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Is it possible to queue for one kind of warzone and not the others? I despise Huttball but like the others. If not I think they should add this feature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severianz Posted January 19, 2012 Author Share Posted January 19, 2012 Is it possible to queue for one kind of warzone and not the others? I despise Huttball but like the others. If not I think they should add this feature. Nope. Completely random. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremybtg Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Sure it does. As Malgus tried to create his own Imperial Empire and establish himself as the new emperor... You can have Imps vs. Imps trying to get the same technology. Then on Alderaan it's CIVIL war meaning the houses could hire Imps & Sith to oppose eachother. It's all right there. Your arguments are stretched defending poor development choices. What arguments? We are telling you facts. Do you think it would be hard for them to impliment that? It wouldn't. They won't because as much as you might like to make drastic story choices to extend faction vs faction pvp to the other two warzones they'll do something much more practical and create new warzones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talorya Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 This is a "story-driven" MMO, which means certain design choices (like the basis for the PvP warzones) must have a credible story basis. Imperials fighting each other over a datacore doesn't make sense. You really don't understand Sith politics... We fight each other all the time, employing all our resources to manipulate, undermine, or eliminate anyone that is in our way or could potentially become a threat. A datacore gained by another Sith/Imperial is a datacore lost. What one gained then could become a weapon to be used against you in the future in some way. It makes sense to send our own people to fight against other imperials, this is the Empire, there is no "friendly territory". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vlacke Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Two words. ROLL REPUBLIC This. When the factions get more balance there will be more war zones among other things. Giving the Empire an option to play versus each other was a mistake in the first place that didn't help with balance issues at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts