Logic.

2014 wants to smack you.

Walls of text do not excuse badness. Complaining about dying while not using all available dcds is /facepalm. Stop trying to argue otherwise. Commando certainly isn't the strongest pvp class, but it's come a long way in the last few patches and will see further buffs in 2.8. Looking at the leaderboards it appears as if mercs/mandos are doing just fine. You, sir, are either a bad pvper, bad troll, or both.

Lolnecro

Oh I see it all the time. I was referring to myself in that instance.

Don't kid yourself. This is a video game forum. Nothing anyone could say....ever....gets taken personally. I'm just pointing out the ridiculousness of your argument(s). We all support different things we'd like to see in this game, some bigger than others. There's nothing wrong with that. For example: I don't support the inclusion of anymore romance arcs, whether they be same gender or not. The existing ones lack any real depth or meaning. They are cheap, shallow, cheesy, poorly done, contribute nothing to the story in any real way and would be better left to rp. I think the production of any romance arcs are a waste of finite resources that should be more responsibly allocated to areas of the game that truly need attention and attract subscribers. However, I don't feel the need to troll every sgra thread that pops up from the same crusaders of that. If that's you're belief on the whole traditional Jedi robe discussion, fine. But arguing over "traditional" and other meaningless semantics as if you're dead *** right is just :| ......and you won't find many who take you seriously.

Yes it was. This thread is actually about gi joe vs thundercats.

It's a public forum..... If you want a private two-way conversation send PMs.

Oddball, I'm sorry. I can't take you seriously anymore. It's very clear what people are asking for. You're arguing for the sake of arguing. I've read all your posts on the subject. I just rarely choose to post in these threads as it's obvious BW does what they want when they want. There's no missed meaning; no hidden message; nothing complex about what you're saying....at all. You have an issue with verbiage, and it's you who is really missing the point, apparently. It's easily one of the dumbest arguments I've seen on the forums to-date. Call them anything you want, but it's clear what people are asking for. For the record I also think these threads are annoying. BW knows what they want, and the same crusaders blowing up the forum aren't gonna change anything. I support their message, but not the means they go about delivering it. If you don't support it cause you think it's a waste of finite resources; well that's fine and dandy. But the arguments you've been making are :| But those walls if text doe......

Just wanted to drop in quick. No one is asking that all Jedi characters be forced to wear traditional Jedi robes. Only that something that has been reposted time and time again be introduced. The fact that at least some Jedi of this era, and before, wore them means they have a place. In previous conversations you griped about a lack of mando/bh armor that had a different flavor (ie: lighter looking armor style or other cosmetic tweaks/alterations). Such armor is being introduced in the next pack. Yet I'm sure it won't meet your standard to some degree and desire something else. I also find your posts amusing considering how outspoken you are against their introduction; yet have a link to helmets that lack voice modulation in your sig. I'm sure you have some logic that you internally use that makes that a priority whereas this is irrelevant. Also lol at asking for proof of said robes during this era. The subject has been hashed over, with evidence provided, so often that even I, as a fairly non-vocal supporter of this, am tired of seeing it.

There's no meaningful conversation to be had with someone who says: It translates into: "I forget/don't bother to use dcds half the time, but clearly X is op cause i died." Additionally, there is an incoming fd nerf combined with a merc buff in 2.8. Even without that, this is a l2p issue for you.

Your wall of text doesn't excuse badness.

No brah. It's like useless and stuff.

Jugs are not the anti class to sniper. It's the other way around.

Aaaand this explains so much about the op. /thread

Cause I already watched all the internets ****...

Lololololololol

I see what you're saying, however balancing classes on likelihood of MVP votes or medals is just bad. A reasonable chance of getting 8 medals is all that's required.

It's a means to an end. If the ultimate goal is to reduce ttk, with a "goal" ttk in mind, then it's not much different. It's one of those more than one way to skin a cat things. Also, it's not a hot. It's a reactive heal with charges that are triggered by incoming dmg. A subtle but important difference.

I understood where you're coming from, but it's just.....off.....way off. The consular ACs are capable of all three roles. Does that mean that in some way they should be able to do it all while others can't? If you want to go by that line if logic. FD is a means for the DPS specs to more successfully tank.

I like most of your posts. But this one makes me scratch my head.

Wtb sechsy playable sullustans.

This.

Please direct me to another thread other than this one and the other "omg nerf guardians nao!!!111!" thread, where I was directly replying to you. I can't think of any as I have nothing personally against you and have no desire to create unnecessary dislike between us. I just think many of your recent posts have been ridiculous and have, as a result, replied.

The thread title got me all hawt.