Jump to content

BC - PvP Hall of Fame, Epeen, and Splendor


hulcalan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 252
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

dont you mean 360/360? 2.0 changed the medals from 300k to 360k. :p

 

I'm really open to suggestions to those crazy hard to get categories that you guys would htink is fun. BTW I will update all records tomorrow. I generally will not update through the weekend as that is my family time. So, not much time is dedicated to the game. Just an FYI.

 

But seriously, Open to suggestions to cool categories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah the game hugely overrates how much good it does your team to kill a ball carrier when they're on your ledge about to score. You get something like 7000 objective points for that and we did it two or three times.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liscil

highest protection

634615

http://i.imgur.com/T3v7dKQ.jpg

6-8-13

unranked

 

Liscil

highest protection

615199

http://i.imgur.com/3BcmGlJ.jpg

6-7-13

ranked

Name: Itoa

Screenshot Link: http://www.nmichaels.org/files/Screenshot_2013-06-09_22_26_40_116182.jpg

Record Broken: Damage Taken

Value: 837914

Type of Match: Unranked

Name: Sithani

Screenshot Link: http://www.nmichaels.org/files/Screenshot_2013-06-08_18_19_18_745249.jpg

Type of Match: Unranked

Record Broken: HPS #1

Value: 1875.31 HPS

Record Broken: Total Healing #2

Value: 1714037

 

Date: 2013-06-08

 

Rules:

1) Screenshots must be legitimate - IE you cannot farm for particular stats and each SS will be evaluated for this.

2) Only print screen screenshots with the date in the chat box will be accepted.

2) To keep a standard median we will use all in-game statistics - This includes DPS, I understand you can calculate

it however the game for some reason has its own set of equations and conditions so to make everything standard we will follow the built in counter.

3 Screenshots must be of max level pvp (Sub-Bracket does not qualify)

4) If there is a bug or something that makes PvP dmg unbalanced the records will reset once the bug is fixed, but until that time records will continue.

4) Keep this thread clean. We don't need excessive arguments.

5) Have fun with this! This isn't meant to solidify anyone's ego.

 

 

 

If you do not follow the directions I cannot award you a record. If I broke my own rules there would be no civility and chaos would ensue. Please make sure that you either Write the date or a nice message to myself inside your screenshot's chat log before you screen capture. (be sure to add some sort of date). So, I apologize but I cannot accept these admissions as they do not meet the requirements.

Edited by hulcalan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

some INSanitize dps here

 

MOST DPS IN WZ

1,657,731

Sanitize

Unranked

http://i40.tinypic.com/bgbnl3.png

 

DAMAGE PER SEC

1964.14

Sanitize

Unranked

http://i40.tinypic.com/bgbnl3.png

 

HIGHEST HIT

9,489

Deyvon

Unranked

http://i41.tinypic.com/2s786es.png

 

DMG TAKEN

614,055

Myrmedon

Unranked

http://i42.tinypic.com/9ihg7n.png

 

PROTECTION IN SINGLE LIFE

346,242

Myrmedon

Unranked

http://i42.tinypic.com/9ihg7n.png

 

MOST MEDALS IN MATCH

19

Myrmedon

Unranked

http://i41.tinypic.com/254vbzq.png

 

unfortunately no date no record D:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

updated*

 

I cannot stress it enough ... no date in your screen shots no records.. no exceptions... I apologize, but a line has to be drawn and we have to establish Standard Operating Procedure, so it's fair every time. Thank you for participating in this thread, I look forward to seeing crazy numbers. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should allow a grace period for people to notice the change with the date in chat. I know for a fact those screens Myrm took were a couple days old. Ill give you a few examples of how: zeikaroz is in our guild. He just recently joined. You can ask him how old those are if you want another person to verify. He's also in infamous. You also have sanitize, someone who we've been grouping with only recently. Again you can ask him to verify. And last but certainly not least, you can see Luix in we stack presence. That guild was created just recently as well, after the double proc bug. (I would know because it was the result of a few removals from Retal). As you said at the end of the day its all about seeing fun numbers, but I vouch, and you can get the above to as well, for the screens Myrm uploaded since I remember them doing it only a few days ago. I have no reason to lie, and even if it were during the proc bug period, we have at least 1 record up there now that clearly was. In the end its your thread, but I hate to see legitimate records go down because people haven't taken full notice of the updated criteria yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am all for re-uploading the images based on your criteria, only reason I posted without that was because there are several records on the front page that do not have them as well. The screens I took are from the past 5 days, if your not going to take them it's only fair that you remove the other images from the first post that don't fit your criteria.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should allow a grace period for people to notice the change with the date in chat. I know for a fact those screens Myrm took were a couple days old. Ill give you a few examples of how: zeikaroz is in our guild. He just recently joined. You can ask him how old those are if you want another person to verify. He's also in infamous. You also have sanitize, someone who we've been grouping with only recently. Again you can ask him to verify. And last but certainly not least, you can see Luix in we stack presence. That guild was created just recently as well, after the double proc bug. (I would know because it was the result of a few removals from Retal). As you said at the end of the day its all about seeing fun numbers, but I vouch, and you can get the above to as well, for the screens Myrm uploaded since I remember them doing it only a few days ago. I have no reason to lie, and even if it were during the proc bug period, we have at least 1 record up there now that clearly was. In the end its your thread, but I hate to see legitimate records go down because people haven't taken full notice of the updated criteria yet.

 

ok I will add them ... BUT STARTING TODAY I WILL ACCEPT NONE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok I will add them ... BUT STARTING TODAY I WILL ACCEPT NONE

 

It would probably be best to just remove them all and start over, that would be more fair to future participants IMO. Just make clear that if you don't post it with the criteria it won't be accepted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would probably be best to just remove them all and start over, that would be more fair to future participants IMO. Just make clear that if you don't post it with the criteria it won't be accepted.

 

not that serious... just from today on ... ill only accept the requested criteria ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HIGHEST HIT #1

10,006

Sabina

Unranked

06-01-2013

http://i.imgur.com/rdwC0Tj.jpg

 

HIGHEST HIT #2

9,826

Sabina

Unranked

06-08-2013

http://i.imgur.com/jNKHzeH.jpg

 

Edit: Oops, clicked on last page of the thread and didn't see the date-in-chat requirement. Moving along :(

(Sithani and Editor -- non-guildies -- can vouch for me if it's an integrity issue.)

Edited by Shinwon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

..

 

My suggestion would be to simply Bold and change the color of the new rule. Regardless if people can read or not you always need to cater to those who don't follow directions so when they argue you turn around and point and say "SEE I MADE IT BOLD FOR YOU. NO COOKIES FOR YOU /LAUGH".

Edited by CommunityDroidFR
repost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

 

When you accept certain records that do not fit your criteria it is silly to criticize others for posting records that also don't follow your set of rules. If you don't follow your own set of rules how can you expect others to do so? :confused:

Edited by CommunityDroidFR
repost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...