ecana Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Not going to spoil anything but I'm sure the other warriors know. Totally living the story. But how dare you not let me kill that companion bio. I'm guessing in beta like....99% killed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Zone Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Not going to spoil anything but I'm sure the other warriors know. Totally living the story. But how dare you not let me kill that companion bio. I'm guessing in beta like....99% killed it. I'm with you on the fact that Quinn should die horribly for being such a backstabbing suckup. Use the DROID as a Healer! lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crezelle Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 death is too humane.feed on your hate every time you see him on your ship.feed on his agony as you give him the hose again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWagner Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 I don't want to kill him. But Vette does. http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/542/screenshot2012032016525.jpg/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altyrell Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 Seriously this REALLY OLD TOPIC again. They've gave a perfectly LEGITIMATE reason as to why they removed it. People would kill their Companions only to realize THEY WERE SCREWED because now they no longer have Companions to help Craft, Harvest, Help them in battle, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacrmeno Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 Quinn should've just been an important NPC who betrays you, cause it doesn't make sense THAT YOU CAN ROMANCE HIM AFTERWARDS!, also as a Lord of the Sith you would obivously kill him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthRamette Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 Quinn should've just been an important NPC who betrays you, cause it doesn't make sense THAT YOU CAN ROMANCE HIM AFTERWARDS!, also as a Lord of the Sith you would obivously kill him. I didn't, as a LS Sith I beat him up but I wouldn't kill him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacrmeno Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 Well, at least you had that option, still a bit weird you can romance him after though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugarnails Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 I guess I'd be in the 1% that didn't/wouldn't. Being married to my warrior is all the punishment he needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibmachine Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 Seriously this REALLY OLD TOPIC again. They've gave a perfectly LEGITIMATE reason as to why they removed it. People would kill their Companions only to realize THEY WERE SCREWED because now they no longer have Companions to help Craft, Harvest, Help them in battle, etc. Those that want him dead provided legitimate reasons as well. Not to mention that frankly, if someone picked the option to KILL THE COMPANION and was then wondering why can't he use that companion, I consider nothing short of a moron. That said, what really irks people about this issue is inability to punish the guy in any way other than some cutscene choking. No long-term repercussions. Absolutely none. The most popular thread about this issue has been filled lately with "let me fit him with Vette's collar" rather than "I want him dead and buried". There is game mechanics and there is story, especially in RPG. In this case, it doesn't matter if you pick LS or DS cause it's gonna be LS anyway. And that's flawed. In the end, the entire situation should be deleted altogether instead of railroading people into one possible choice despite having 3 dialogue options that give an illusion of an actual choice. While permanently killing the companion isn't a good idea and I actually agree with the devs here, allowing players to punish the companion and see this punishment reflected ingame - is. However, we are presented with only option 1. And that's what people are angry about, myself included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenjaminminU Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 Should be able to kill him, its not like it'd be impossible to replace him with another companion later on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecana Posted March 23, 2012 Author Share Posted March 23, 2012 Seriously this REALLY OLD TOPIC again. They've gave a perfectly LEGITIMATE reason as to why they removed it. People would kill their Companions only to realize THEY WERE SCREWED because now they no longer have Companions to help Craft, Harvest, Help them in battle, etc. pump the breaks man, we're all just having a bit of fun here we know why they did what they did. Ps. they should have let us put a shock collar on him... omg thats a awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwesome ideal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts