Pullzar Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 (edited) I would like the option to vote someone OUT of a warzone. tooooo many times we get the AFK'rs, the jackhats who just try to ruin everything. the people who just want to down their entire team, when in all reality, theyre doing the worst out of everyone. I dont think itd be unacceptable for teh opsleader to call a vote to have someone kicked. then, they get booted, no reward at all, and we get some new blood in. yez no ? *edit* Since no ones redin the rest of the thread, ill just stick this up here. Can limit the amt of kicks per game to 1 or 2, that keeps down the "abuse" that everyone will aparantly cause. This way u only really get rid of that one afk'r, or that one griefer who keeps yanking his own team into the fire. Edited February 1, 2012 by Pullzar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wombraider Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 This is too open to abuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tsupra Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Not even wow has this and the reason is that can be easilly abused!so.. no:P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illwill- Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Not even wow has this and the reason is that can be easilly abused!so.. no:P Ah, right. Can't implement something that WoW doesn't have...except talking NPCs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pullzar Posted February 1, 2012 Author Share Posted February 1, 2012 (edited) theres not a single thing in this GAME that cant be "open to abuse" lol. the WZ mechanic itself is already jacked up by the afk'rs "abusing" the fact that they can just go in, afk, and stay there lol. everyone wants sumthin done about it, this is an option. has anyone brought up a better one? vote to kick em out, heck, even limit the # of kicks per game u can have to like, 1 or 2. i dont see how getting rid of one person whos killing his own teammates, is "abuse" *edit* i never played wow except for the first month it was out, so not only do i not know its mechanics, i dont care about them. it was a crappy game. Edited February 1, 2012 by Pullzar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blasphemerr Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 No. While I want the best team, I have no interest in voting for the warzone to shutdown because some clowns decide to votekick people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elyree Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 No, too prone to abuse/greifing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ssfbistimg Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 theres not a single thing in this GAME that cant be "open to abuse" lol. the WZ mechanic itself is already jacked up by the afk'rs "abusing" the fact that they can just go in, afk, and stay there lol. everyone wants sumthin done about it, this is an option. has anyone brought up a better one? vote to kick em out, heck, even limit the # of kicks per game u can have to like, 1 or 2. i dont see how getting rid of one person whos killing his own teammates, is "abuse" *edit* i never played wow except for the first month it was out, so not only do i not know its mechanics, i dont care about them. it was a crappy game. that isn't. but if you load a warzone and everyone is in there 40's except you a level 10. You don't think they are going to kick you out just because you are a level 10. of course they will. they want to win and they think because you are a lowbie you most be a bad. so yes that is abuse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazorous Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 (edited) theres not a single thing in this GAME that cant be "open to abuse" lol. the WZ mechanic itself is already jacked up by the afk'rs "abusing" the fact that they can just go in, afk, and stay there lol. everyone wants sumthin done about it, this is an option. has anyone brought up a better one? vote to kick em out, heck, even limit the # of kicks per game u can have to like, 1 or 2. i dont see how getting rid of one person whos killing his own teammates, is "abuse" You'll rethink this when you happen to call out a couple of ppl because they weren't doing their objectives correctly, just to find out they were grouped together so they easily vote kick you out of a winning WZ. You're only thinking one side to this. Vote Kick systems favor those in groups and can easily kick people they don't like. EDIT: The post above brings another good point that pretty much all your lowbie alts will be kicked out of WZs from then on. Edited February 1, 2012 by Lazorous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campaigner Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 So if a premade has a grudge against you since you fought them earlier they can just kick you for revenge? Smart idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pullzar Posted February 1, 2012 Author Share Posted February 1, 2012 that isn't. but if you load a warzone and everyone is in there 40's except you a level 10. You don't think they are going to kick you out just because you are a level 10. of course they will. they want to win and they think because you are a lowbie you most be a bad. so yes that is abuse wow, some of u think of some of the most negative things to do with a WZ option lol. i kno i personally wouldnt kick a lowbie lvl 10, juz because he was there. maybe its because i dont have any problems with them bein in the WZ. i dont need to create a "dream team" just to play in a WZ, and as such im not processing the multitude of "abuse factors" that some of u apparently, are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToliverGrey Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 WoW does indeed have a version of this, if only for AFKers. Enough people report you AFK and you get booted from the BG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jontar Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 I think we need one but it can and will be abused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tsupra Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 (edited) Ah, right. Can't implement something that WoW doesn't have...except talking NPCs. the reason is written just after the part you 've read Edited February 1, 2012 by tsupra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rehme Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 (edited) I would like the option to vote someone OUT of a warzone. tooooo many times we get the AFK'rs, the jackhats who just try to ruin everything. the people who just want to down their entire team, when in all reality, theyre doing the worst out of everyone. I dont think itd be unacceptable for teh opsleader to call a vote to have someone kicked. then, they get booted, no reward at all, and we get some new blood in. yez no ? *edit* Since no ones redin the rest of the thread, ill just stick this up here. Can limit the amt of kicks per game to 1 or 2, that keeps down the "abuse" that everyone will aparantly cause. This way u only really get rid of that one afk'r, or that one griefer who keeps yanking his own team into the fire. Agreed. There should also be the ability to type out an email message from each of the voters detailing why person x sucks/sucked and got kicked. I think this would be an extremely effective method of deterring sucktastic WZ players. /sign Edited February 1, 2012 by Rehme Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazorous Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 wow, some of u think of some of the most negative things to do with a WZ option lol. i kno i personally wouldnt kick a lowbie lvl 10, juz because he was there. maybe its because i dont have any problems with them bein in the WZ. i dont need to create a "dream team" just to play in a WZ, and as such im not processing the multitude of "abuse factors" that some of u apparently, are. They are "processing it" because such factors exists and are realistic. You may not have been involved in WZ's at low levels (10-15) and have ppl in the game tell you NOT to queue because they think you are detrimental to the group. Happens quite often in my servers, and it has been mentioned on the forums. It's a little less of an issue now, with lvl 50 brackets. But there are still people that check out your levels and have their own judgements of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campaigner Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 wow, some of u think of some of the most negative things to do with a WZ option lol. i kno i personally wouldnt kick a lowbie lvl 10, juz because he was there. maybe its because i dont have any problems with them bein in the WZ. i dont need to create a "dream team" just to play in a WZ, and as such im not processing the multitude of "abuse factors" that some of u apparently, are. How naive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dharagada Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 WoW does indeed have a version of this, if only for AFKers. Enough people report you AFK and you get booted from the BG. Yep and if you where actually active (ie people tried to report you as afk when you where not) the system wouldn't kick you. It wasn't perfect but it did work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anslet Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 I hadn't come across this until yesterday. I had a person blatantly stealth and go afk in 2-3 WZ. Ironically the same person was advertising LFG for HM's and OP's. Gee, I womder why they have to pug? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LanceUpercutt Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 (edited) i am for this vote kick option as my group would like to kick out people that suck Edited February 1, 2012 by LanceUpercutt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pullzar Posted February 1, 2012 Author Share Posted February 1, 2012 They are "processing it" because such factors exists and are realistic. You may not have been involved in WZ's at low levels (10-15) and have ppl in the game tell you NOT to queue because they think you are detrimental to the group. Happens quite often in my servers, and it has been mentioned on the forums. It's a little less of an issue now, with lvl 50 brackets. But there are still people that check out your levels and have their own judgements of you. yes, i understand that they exist and are realistic. ive never said they werent, i was just shocked at how quickly people come up with a way in their heads to "abuse" a system. And yes, ive done PvP since i hit 10. in fact, other than the storyline mission, pvp is ALL ive done in this game. so ive come to understand quite a few random frustrations with the current system. I did not start at lvl 50 like some may think. If there isa better way to get rid of the same team griefers, or the AFK'rs, im am AALLL ears, but no one has brought one up yet. Even by limiting my idea to "only ONE person per game can be kicked by majority vote" folks seem to have some magic issue with it. i dont see how ONE person bein kicked, can be abused but hey, i dont look for ways to abuse the system either. its just an IDEA, do u have better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
belialle Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 No, this would be abused by every ******** and premade that didn't want a fresh level 10 player in their WZ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campaigner Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 i am for this vote kick option as my group would like to kick out people that suck And angry players who are bad at reasoning would also kick out the "goods" who killed them earlier. You guys need to think these things through... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greyfeld Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 i am for this vote kick option as my group would like to kick out people that suck This is exactly why we're saying "no" to the OP's idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pullzar Posted February 1, 2012 Author Share Posted February 1, 2012 someone please explain to me ho whaving the ability to VOTE to kick ONE person, ONE, not all, just ONE SINGLE person, can be abused. I understand teh "lvl 10's and i get that, but other than that?? how can it be THAT abused?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts