I'm in-between liking and hating gunships. I have good games and bad games like anyone else, but when you're facing a team full of gunship users its kind of ridiculous. Of course, you can argue I should just use the same tactics or be a better scout pilot, but no amount of skill in the world is going to prevent a gunship from popping you when there's a multitude of them gunning for you. The problem with gunships right now is that there's too many. I'd go as far as saying the match should limit the number of gunships allowed, but then that makes it potentially exclusive to noob or bad players on a first come first serve basis. So instead of standing by that notion, I'll say the mechanics of gunships need to change to make them require some measure of skill rather than being a campy-go-lucky player option.

I've given up on it too. When I first started it was fun, but now its just boring and bland. Plus now that everyone has access to gunships, that's all I ever see people using and that gets boring fast. Games don't fill up either. I'm on The Bastion. The problem isn't queuing as a group or solo, its people losing interest.

I'd like to see personally a clothes Kyle Katarn wear's in the cartel market. Sure, we're talking thousands of years in the future lore wise, but who is to say the Sullustian's that he purchased the clothing from weren't crafting their gear in such a manner for thousands of years.I do enjoy the CM armor that's for sale, but I'd also like to see later EU characters get their gear put in game, especially that of Ulec Qel-Droma and Exar Kun.

Quoted for truth. I cancelled and have 49 days left on my account.

Erickson better learn what the word priority means before he uses it. A lack of players at peak hours means a lack of individuals willing to play the game, which means most likely that individuals will see this lack of willingness as a lack of subscribers and follow suit and unsubscribe themselves. If mergers are not a priority, that means Bioware isn't taking this issue as seriously as the player base is, which means that unfortunately, this game isn't as important to them as they'd like us to believe.

I wish that were true.

I agree, 400,000 is a lot. You're not alone.

Just jumping into the pool without your floats on eh? People have been citing articles or quoting posters who have cited these articles on every page.

This oughta be my signature.

Considering those are the only people that are relevant to the thread, and people are quoting them... yeah I'd say those are the people you mean.

So people posting links to articles that factually present the loss of 25% of the game's population in a period of less than four months is an assumption?

You're right, its not a surprise. 400,000 is a shock. Especially considering the game's life span.

Yeah, not only an official statement, but an official statement that makes the company look bad. So continue to be snarky and defend your point which is... what exactly?

Firreal, right? Sky is also blue, fanboys gonna deny that too? SOMETIMES ITS ORANGE AND BLACK TOO PROLAPSE IS A LIAR.

400,000 lost, people. 400,000 lost. Kotaku and EA's explanation below. Now think about that for a minute before you continue to flame people for citing articles over the dramatic drop in subscribers. Article.