I highly doubt they will throw someone out of the game, only in the que. How would you like to be disconnected so that someone else can play?

I agree, the FTP players are the ones who are going to be waiting. and i was just looking at the servers and there is only two Very Heavy. Unless they were full earlier, but i would rather have too many people trying to play the game than too little. For example when SWG died, there was hardly anyone around. I would much rather have a lot of people on the servers than not enough. I am sure that Bioware already has a plan in place if these servers are full all the time, what about all the ones that they had? I am sure they still have a few of those around and will most likely open them up for FTP players and others to play on. If not they will create more, you know with all the money they'll get from FTP players and subs that they can afford to open up new servers, i highly doubt 12 is going to be the max #.

hahaha, now that is funny

I agree and disagree now on this topic. A lot of people are right, you don't want to give the F2P too much of the warzone experience or else they will not sub. Though i do still think that three warzones per week is still too low. I play at least 10 a day or every other day. The new player is not even coming close to enjoying the warzones if all they can do is 3. Like someone said, what happens if you have a few people leave, what if the player doesn't get out of the beginning area in time and gets kicked out. There are a lot of things that can happen, sometimes i get disconnected from the warzone. So i still think 3 is going to really upset a lot of new players. Sure, they get a taste of the game which is great, you don't want them to have too much, but you also don't want them to have too little. I know, i'm going to hear that's why they should sub so they can do more. A better number for them is at least 7 per week, that is make it 1 per day. Even just doing 1 per day is just a tease, as you know they are going to want to do more and waiting 24 hours to do the next one is going to be hard. I do see the positive and negative sides to this, but still if you want people to pay for it, at least give them a little more taste. As a subscriber, how would you feel if you could only do one warzone a day? I know that will never happen, but can you imagine the frustration? Sure, there's a reason why it's only three, makes them want to sub. I understand that, but i still feel 3 is too low. If not 7 then maybe at least 4 or 5.

First of all, i am a subscriber and always will be. I was only stating that i don't think it's fair to only have 3 Wz per week. Of course the game is free, so the more i think about it 3 is good as you want them to have a taste. I would rather pay the $15 a month than to play F2P and end up spending more, as you know people will.

You know, you are right. I never thought about how all the noobs would come in and ruin it. You'll have them standing around. I know that it's just a taste, so if they are to up it i would say 5. That's enough to give them a taste, but then again 3 is not bad. You will have people whining anyway because they want to do more then 3, but that is the point of subscibing.

Yes, that is true and i forgot about the daily. They will not be able to do the weekly as that's 9 per week. That is almost like a slap in the face to new players, not giving them a chance to really see what warzones are like. There are more than 3 warzones, and with another added soon it could be 2 weeks before some players see them if they are unlucky to get the same ones over and over. Bioware really needs to rethink their limit!

I am a subscriber, but i don't think that's fair. They really should raise the limit to like 15 per week, not 3. I understand that you have to purchase unlimited with cartel coins, but still that's not a way to get F2P players interested in playing warzones. That is going to make it almost impossible to gain commedations for gear. I hope they reconsider that, not saying they have to make it a high number, but you would think you would want them to experience it frequently to decide if they want to unlock it. 3 Per week is lame if you ask me even for a F2P player.

Did you order the collectors edition?, it shows 1000 for that. Not sure what the standard or deluxe give.

For me it was the speeder, Lobelot and then i found one after i bought him. The Bowcasters are nice and the armor which is soon to be legacy bound is not bad. Just wish the price to extract a barrel wasn't so high. If anything i'll transfer the armor to a new toon.

The maintenance has begun, the tokens are no more. So what are you going to charge per token starting now when the game goes up again? I just wanted to see what the going prices are going to be, i know it has been between 2-3K per token. What are you going to sell it for?

There are many who have bought the Lobelot only to find it in a crate and now we all have an extra. However, now we are stuck with it and can't give it away to our fellow guild members or anyone else. Please make it so at least it can be traded or mailed. I understand your reasons for making it bound is so that it won't show up on the GTN for 300,000. It would be ncie for Pets or quest items to be able to be tradeable.

Guess that was a marketing thing to get us to panic and buy it up.

True, now maybe i can go and get an extra and leave it sealed and see if it gains any value lol

K-Mart to sell CE for $30. I paid $150 and some paid more, that is just sad!! It makes me furious, so i hope they have a limited supply, so much for it being sold out as we thought. http://www.swtorstrategies.com/2012/08/swtor-collectors-edition-now-30-bucks-at-kmart.html