'Fanboy', 'hater', 'troll'. Most often I've found these labels to be barriers to conversation rather than bridges across it. Something to do with reducing a person to a label in order to reconcile a point of view that conflicts with the one you're more accustomed to, I think. But lets be fair, as soon as you start thinking of something as "your game", you're probably in trouble. Played WoW for 7 years, It was never "my" game, but it was fun while it lasted. And every person I played with was just another person trying to have a good time, for the most part- each equally capable of being both eloquent and ham-handed in their ability to express things.

We'll need a time machine to answer this one.

I will find your tone as abrasive, combative, and needlessly confrontational as I did the first time, yes. You reap what you sow.

And the tone of your opening post in no way sets the tone of the thread... of course.

Good sir! I find your publication most interesting and should like to subscribe to your dead hamster!

Incidentally you can also perceive "improvement" a lot of different ways.

Eh. Everyone playing a free market system is looking for an outcome that most benefits them. It's just most realize that's achieved within the system, and not outside of it.

Undead. Undead. Undead.

Not my rich. Your rich.

Oh, histrionics. How droll.

I am. Yes. Little dizzy. How are you?

Ow! Right in the Free Market! Oi!

Nah. 'Too Loud'. The issue they were having with Tauntauns throwing their voices seems to be in effect for Varactyls.

I would think your GF would rescind the lockout not long after you decided to get away from the computer. Unless you really cheesed her off, that is. That said, I have no idea.

I'd just like to thank the OP for his economy of words. You made me stop reading this post in record time.

However, shortly thereafter you were merely 'novel'.

Exaggerate about 98% less and we may have a deal.

My logic bone may be broken. Considering how many body-blows logic has taken in these forums of late, I think it's understandable. Hell, the galactically-inadequate understanding of even the most fundamental concepts of the nature of RNG is enough to send one on an all-expense paid padded room vacation. Hint: It does not- under any circumstances- mean that you are guaranteed a winning roll after a set number of purchases- even if the set number happens to be a large number. So yes, it's very possible my logic bone is broken. Your logic bone however apparently has the rickets. Whether real money or credits were spent, it was still spent at the choice of the person spending it. Just as the Law of Averages doesn't take a vacation because it sees Humbunctious coming, so too does the nature of choice not cease to apply simply because the currency involved in that choice has changed.

Then you haven't seen much. Yes, I know what you said- 14 years and all of that. I still stand by it.

Isn't that when you believe in something really hard- like, REALLY hard?

Why would Brian Weseman be running in your book, high or low?

i think they are this much random and rare.

Starscream from Transformers Prime, Roger Smith from the Big O cartoon...

Well, it's still red. And it still results from pressing buttons too rapidly. I do this, actually. I just have this sort of ability you see to mentally filter out the text. Not sure where I got these superhuman powers. Maybe I went to some sort of special school owned by a bald paraplegic. Or perhaps I was bitten by a radioactive keyboard buffer. Maybe I was bombarded with alpha radiation from sitting in front of my monitor too long. In any case, yes, I am pretty amazing.

I keep reading this as "ban high heels". For some reason that seems more plausible to me. Random.