AragarVarnus Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 From Qa'bumm: "Some of his previous efforts" you say. Yeah that 1 single parse I did for lulz. You are portraying me like I want to cheat my way to the top of the leaderboards on a regular basis. I am not happy with that. Oh my bad it was two... had to redo my first one cause only one friend was around at the time and also mucked up my rotation, but that is irrelevant. Hello, the parse with legacy abilities and class buffs was for the lulz, I did not seriously expect it to be eligible. Killed nim pilgrim for the mount mission and and thats where the wild idea came from. It took some great amount of digging to find even a hint of rules (like page 10 something in this thread) for the leaderboards (I did it after the legacy parse, so up to that point I really had no clue to be honest XD). That's when I learened you cant use grenades, no one else can give you raid buffs, no nim pilgrim buff (although I have no clue how you track that tbh), no legacy abilties.... hopefully I did not miss anything important. I think it would be great if you created a Leaderboard Rules tab so that there is no confusion and everythign is crystall clear (ignore me if I missed the obvious though). At no point do you mention that a video is required as proof, so naturally I did not bother at all. On top of that I am not in the habit of recording hours and hours and hours and ..... hours of parsing. That jewel right there took a LOT of work, time, money and adrenals. The reason I only used one adrenal in that parse is because I only realised half way through I was actually out already. So bummer like 2 gcds could have benefited from it at the end. You are being terribly unfair btw judging my intentions from a legacy parse that I did not even QQ about not appearing on leaderboards. Your website is there to upload parses and analyse them, that's exactly what I used it for. Also, Nerevar's top parse is on the ridiculous end as well, yet as I skimmed through the thread here you did not demand a recording from him (if I missed it though, then ignore this point). You do not have a shred of real evidence to challange the parse only your "suspicion" based on one lulzy legacy parse for fun. Replicating this and getting a recording of it too is essentially impossible. It's never going to happen again and after all that work I'm done parsing for a very long time. Especially if legitimate efforts don't get recognised. Related to this, it would be lovely if you could implement a leaderboard where groups of consecituve parses would need to be uploaded, like 5 or soemthing (and knock out best and worst), I dunno. Cause to be honest, these insane crit parses such as mine don't have much helpful information for others checking out parses. "Oh look AP is top dps now well over 5k!!" When this is in general terms completely false. Groups of parses with more average results is also going to be a great way to look at different rotations and get a sense of how well they do and more easily pin point what is better and what is less ideal, and there is execution too.... I looked at a lot of AP/tactics parses and I just facepalmed how badly a lion's share of them were executed: any top parse with more than 8 basic attacks is garbage from an execution point of view, 10 with old setbonus (I looked at Neravar's top parse too in detail and frankly some things I'm not happy with there either). Right now the goal is who can get the best and most ridiculous crits, which is what I aimed for. I realise this may take a bit of work, but if the suggested parsing mentality could be adopted starting with 4.0, that would be a great change IMO and a LOT more helpful/informative. Cheers P.S: Feel free to dig into the log if u like, here are the stats I parsed with. 99.99% accuracy: 3 acc augs, 5 enhancements 72.48% surge: 0 augs, 4 enhancements 1.% alacrity: 0 augs, 1 enhancement 441 crit: 0 augs, 1 implant and 3 mods 1690 power 4497 aim (missing about 11 aim, 1 192 set bonus XD, I since then swapped back to the alac build so calculated aim manually, might be a few points off) Tech bonus damage was around 2080 I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealNerevar Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 From Qa'bumm: You do not have a shred of real evidence to challange the parse only your "suspicion" based on one lulzy legacy parse for fun. Replicating this and getting a recording of it too is essentially impossible. It's never going to happen again and after all that work I'm done parsing for a very long time. Especially if legitimate efforts don't get recognised. Should we draw a moral ? From Qa'bumm: I looked at Neravar's top parse too in detail and frankly some things I'm not happy with there either). Right now the goal is who can get the best and most ridiculous crits, which is what I aimed for. My rotation is perfectly executed, and calculated to be optimal on real fights. That's all i need to say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joran-Koon Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 I'm not sure, but your post read like this is a service that is here to benefit you and that it's the only reason for existing. Might I remind you that Mari does this for fun. She works on it in her spare time to create something, and luckily, is nice enough to share it with all the rest of us. So if Mari says something isn't going to fly, it isn't going to fly. She owns it. You can bring up what ever points you like to help make it better, and maybe that is your intention, but from where I sit, and the way you typed that post, you come across as ungrateful and unaware of the privilege (not right) you have to using this system. Lets try again shall we. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnickerJew Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 I'm not sure, but your post read like this is a service that is here to benefit you and that it's the only reason for existing. Might I remind you that Mari does this for fun. She works on it in her spare time to create something, and luckily, is nice enough to share it with all the rest of us. So if Mari says something isn't going to fly, it isn't going to fly. She owns it. You can bring up what ever points you like to help make it better, and maybe that is your intention, but from where I sit, and the way you typed that post, you come across as ungrateful and unaware of the privilege (not right) you have to using this system. Lets try again shall we. So civil as always. Don't you realize you're supposed to burn the witch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KraytAssassin Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 (edited) From Qa'bumm: Right now the goal is who can get the best and most ridiculous crits, which is what I aimed for. Sucks you spent money on trying to get that lucrative 2 weeks before an expansion top parse but you uploaded your log to her site lol sorry its not there. You could use http://torparse.com/ if you really only wanted to analyse your parse. No one cares if it was for the lulz you broke the pretty standard parsing standards (legacy, class buffs, nim pilgrim) and got 5500 with that then expect people to believe you got 5500 again in 1 single parse. a whole 300 - 400 higher than anyone in (PTs) 2nd place and below. And a whole 140 more dps than the top PT who people actually know in the HM/Nim community and has proven he is a top tier player in actual raid scenarios. Okay mate good luck trying to convince us all of that god rng you had Try again 2 weeks before 5.0 next year and try claim your title again PS don't forget to record it! Best of luck Edited October 12, 2015 by KraytAssassin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeSaber Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 (edited) Hey Marisi, tried to upload couple of logs, but they dont upload well, after upload page is blank, here is the parse : http://parsely.io/parser/view/70084/3 Edited October 12, 2015 by SpikeSaber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AbashedDuk Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Sucks you spent money on trying to get that lucrative 2 weeks before an expansion top parse but you uploaded your log to her site lol sorry its not there. You could use http://torparse.com/ if you really only wanted to analyse your parse. No one cares if it was for the lulz you broke the pretty standard parsing standards (legacy, class buffs, nim pilgrim) and got 5500 with that then expect people to believe you got 5500 again in 1 single parse. a whole 300 - 400 higher than anyone in (PTs) 2nd place and below. And a whole 140 more dps than the top PT who people actually know in the HM/Nim community and has proven he is a top tier player in actual raid scenarios. Okay mate good luck trying to convince us all of that god rng you had Try again 2 weeks before 5.0 next year and try claim your title again PS don't forget to record it! Best of luck Torparse still exists??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiththeForc Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Hey Marisi, tried to upload couple of logs, but they dont upload well, after upload page is blank, here is the parse : http://parsely.io/parser/view/70084/3 I had the same problem when trying to upload my log last night. What worked for me was loading the log up in starparse and then uploading each fight individually directly from there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeSaber Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Marisi fixed it, I uploaded it, it worked was on leaderboard, but I wanted to put guild and I forgot, I deleted the log, uploaded again with guild name and it doesnt appear anymore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeSaber Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 (edited) Thanks Edited October 13, 2015 by SpikeSaber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ardarell_Solo Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 (edited) Hey there, Parsely seems to lose data from parses I uploaded. I reuploaded my Sentinel parse, but then it happened again: It's there on the leaderboards (http://parsely.io/parser/leaderboard - El'ethon 150.545) but when I klick to inspect the parse, it says "Nothing to display": http://parsely.io/parser/view/72137/0 Can you check and tell me wether I messed sth up? Edited October 23, 2015 by Ardarell_Solo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kinslayer Posted October 23, 2015 Author Share Posted October 23, 2015 Hey there, Parsely seems to lose data from parses I uploaded. I reuploaded my Sentinel parse, but then it happened again: It's there on the leaderboards (http://parsely.io/parser/leaderboard - El'ethon 150.545) but when I klick to inspect the parse, it says "Nothing to display": http://parsely.io/parser/view/72137/0 Can you check and tell me wether I messed sth up? Nothing wrong with the log or upload, seems to be a cache thing. Either way, works now. 1.5M is now the standard and 2.5 is available for usage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ardarell_Solo Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Nothing wrong with the log or upload, seems to be a cache thing. Either way, works now. Yep it does, thanks again! 1.5M is now the standard and 2.5 is available for usage. Dot Sentinel approves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyboardNinja Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Nothing wrong with the log or upload, seems to be a cache thing. Either way, works now. 1.5M is now the standard and 2.5 is available for usage. Is there a way to automatically detect and disqualify dummy parses that use the nightmare consumable? I guess you could just look for the effect in the log, and then trust to more manual verification for suspiciously-high parses that may have edited out the relevant line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnickerJew Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Is there a way to automatically detect and disqualify dummy parses that use the nightmare consumable? I guess you could just look for the effect in the log, and then trust to more manual verification for suspiciously-high parses that may have edited out the relevant line. Isn't the crystal only usable in an NiM instance? I didn't know you can pop it else where. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyboardNinja Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Isn't the crystal only usable in an NiM instance? I didn't know you can pop it else where. Is that the case? That would mollify me a lot on the stupidity of it as a consumable. You would probably still need to auto-detect it though, because there's nothing stopping someone from zoning into a NiM instance, popping the buff and then going to their ship to parse. They can't strip the effect on phasing (could they?!) since a single miss-click or DC would remove the buff from a very expensive consumable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnickerJew Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Is that the case? That would mollify me a lot on the stupidity of it as a consumable. You would probably still need to auto-detect it though, because there's nothing stopping someone from zoning into a NiM instance, popping the buff and then going to their ship to parse. They can't strip the effect on phasing (could they?!) since a single miss-click or DC would remove the buff from a very expensive consumable. The item says once you zone out of the instance you lose the buff, so I think it's safe to assume it isn't possible to see this on a dummy parse without some crazy exploit of sorts, or if its broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FerkWork Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Isn't the crystal only usable in an NiM instance? I didn't know you can pop it else where. If it works as intended then yes that is correct according to the schematic. Sorry poop quality from phone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bahadori Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Any thoughts on uploaded parses that do not show on the leaderboards or their own class board? I uploaded a parse and had the wrong server assigned to it so i deleted it and re-uploaded it under the correct server and it refuses to show either on the overall leaderboard or class specific listing. Any thoughts? Here is the parse link http://parsely.io/parser/view/71864 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kinslayer Posted October 23, 2015 Author Share Posted October 23, 2015 Any thoughts on uploaded parses that do not show on the leaderboards or their own class board? I uploaded a parse and had the wrong server assigned to it so i deleted it and re-uploaded it under the correct server and it refuses to show either on the overall leaderboard or class specific listing. Any thoughts? Here is the parse link http://parsely.io/parser/view/71864 The reason for this is intentional but I can either make it so guild/server are editable in the log list or there is no preselected server by default which should reduce the chances of situations like this happening. Depends what would be more useful I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kinslayer Posted October 23, 2015 Author Share Posted October 23, 2015 Is that the case? That would mollify me a lot on the stupidity of it as a consumable. You would probably still need to auto-detect it though, because there's nothing stopping someone from zoning into a NiM instance, popping the buff and then going to their ship to parse. They can't strip the effect on phasing (could they?!) since a single miss-click or DC would remove the buff from a very expensive consumable. As mentioned the item is only able to be used inside of a nightmare instance and is removed upon zoning out. so it shouldn't be an issue if it works as described. If I'm able to get reliable nightmare detection otherwise, I'll put a little asterisk or something next to entries that use it on the ops board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bahadori Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 The reason for this is intentional but I can either make it so guild/server are editable in the log list or there is no preselected server by default which should reduce the chances of situations like this happening. Depends what would be more useful I guess. So is there a way to fix it or do i need to do another parse.... :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kinslayer Posted October 29, 2015 Author Share Posted October 29, 2015 There is now the ability to view and compare entries in French and German as well as English. If you're a registered user, you can set this as a default in your profile page, otherwise it can be set on a per-session basis from either page. Currently only log related data is translated to a different language, but I will work on getting the rest of the site done at some point. So is there a way to fix it or do i need to do another parse.... :/ It's been fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holmeskywalkr Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Hi, I deleted a log by mistake, and then when I re up it, my parses dont show up on ops leaderboards, it this a bug? http://parsely.io/parser/view/97108 Thank you & great job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kinslayer Posted November 29, 2015 Author Share Posted November 29, 2015 Hi, I deleted a log by mistake, and then when I re up it, my parses dont show up on ops leaderboards, it this a bug? http://parsely.io/parser/view/97108 Thank you & great job Sorry about the delay, should be ok now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts