OldSpiceSwag Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Opfotm definitely wouldn't transfer his alt to pot5. Sippintrumoo too strong for pot5 anyway, I collected 18 killing blows with Leg Slash already. I shall leg slash kb all of you. /trumoowrath #trumootoostronk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marrio Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Opfotm definitely wouldn't transfer his alt to pot5. Sippintrumoo too strong for pot5 anyway, I collected 18 killing blows with Leg Slash already. I shall leg slash kb all of you. /trumoowrath transferring to pot5 to get all those queues at 1 a.m. pst right Op? hahah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gomex Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 (edited) Proving what point? Anyone who supports the triple scoundrel is as retarded as anyone who supports triple holy pallies in 5s. Thanks for proving my point that you're the same as the retarded holy pallies who bragged about gladiator titles by beating the best teams after boring them out. Edited August 2, 2013 by Gomex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treblt Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 transferring to pot5 to get all those queues at 1 a.m. pst right Op? hahah You wanna queue with me right now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marrio Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Thanks for proving my point that you're the same as the retarded holy pallies who bragged about gladiator titles by beating the best teams after boring them out. Yeah okay, that makes total sense now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gomex Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 (edited) Yeah okay, that makes total sense now. As much sense as you claiming DP queue dodges synergy or bubble/smash came from synergy winning too much. Thanks for avoiding my last few questions to save the embarrassment for the rest of your guild. Edited August 2, 2013 by Gomex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marrio Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 As much sense as you claiming DP queue dodges synergy or bubble/smash came from synergy winning too much. Thanks for avoiding my last few questions to save the embarrassment for the rest of your guild. None of your posts are coherent and nothing you said made sense or was related to what I said. They would not queue against Synergy at level 50 when we asked them if we could play smash, that is a fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tythonians Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 None of your posts are coherent and nothing you said made sense or was related to what I said. They would not queue against Synergy at level 50 when we asked them if we could play smash, that is a fact. You've been drinking too much of Sifu's kool-aid (or Trumoo?). First you claimed the no bubble stun/smash agreement was to hold down Synergy (false), and now you claim that DP refused to play Synergy when they were running smash (false). Maybe Synergy members just don't question Sifu's impeccable logic. After all, he only runs three Scoundrels because there was no available Shadow right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treblt Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 You've been drinking too much of Sifu's kool-aid (or Trumoo?). First you claimed the no bubble stun/smash agreement was to hold down Synergy (false), and now you claim that DP refused to play Synergy when they were running smash (false). Maybe Synergy members just don't question Sifu's impeccable logic. After all, he only runs three Scoundrels because there was no available Shadow right? A- on Sass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSpiceSwag Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 You've been drinking too much of Sifu's kool-aid (or Trumoo?). First you claimed the no bubble stun/smash agreement was to hold down Synergy (false), and now you claim that DP refused to play Synergy when they were running smash (false). Maybe Synergy members just don't question Sifu's impeccable logic. After all, he only runs three Scoundrels because there was no available Shadow right? after seeing the 3 scoundrel debate constantly on the forums for weeks and sifu's "we needed to bc there was never a shadow" i am amazed that nobody else has raised this point seriously.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morde_ Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 (edited) after seeing the 3 scoundrel debate constantly on the forums for weeks and sifu's "we needed to bc there was never a shadow" i am amazed that nobody else has raised this point seriously.... Sifu plays his shadow all the time with that team so the argument is kinda invalid. Edited August 3, 2013 by Morde_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irojoz Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Sifu plays his shadow all the time with that team. Dunno what that guy was talking about. Bro, you cant have your shot caller guarding the node. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morde_ Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 (edited) Lebron doesn't call targets from the bench. Edited August 3, 2013 by Morde_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gomex Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Lebron doesn't call targets from the bench. Ryere disagrees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laithrup Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 DP losing to synergy @ lvl 50 rateds? Are you *********** retarded? Maybe once in a god damn blue moon, and we wouldn't even run all smash. We liked to coordinate with people we enjoyed playing against to do no bubble/smash because it made the game more fun. When synergy queue'd with whatever they had and whatever we had it was srsly no contest. Yeah kinda recently we had some bad games against synergy, 1 night we lost like a ******** in a row. But if you're gonna hold that 1 night saying how you've totally destroyed us, look back on the months of DP just farming the **** out of synergy, I give them props for not giving up though, while many guilds have. And me giving synergy a complement is pretty damn rare. Recently do I even need to bring up how mid fights / kill ratios have been? I hope not.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSpiceSwag Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Sifu plays his shadow all the time with that team so the argument is kinda invalid. thats what i was saying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marrio Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 You've been drinking too much of Sifu's kool-aid (or Trumoo?). First you claimed the no bubble stun/smash agreement was to hold down Synergy (false), and now you claim that DP refused to play Synergy when they were running smash (false). Maybe Synergy members just don't question Sifu's impeccable logic. After all, he only runs three Scoundrels because there was no available Shadow right? I was there it happened. Denial much?? They literally would not queue one night if we played smashers, and they were the only team queing that night. Do you want screenshots? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classicks Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 (edited) You've been drinking too much of Sifu's kool-aid (or Trumoo?). First you claimed the no bubble stun/smash agreement was to hold down Synergy (false), and now you claim that DP refused to play Synergy when they were running smash (false). Maybe Synergy members just don't question Sifu's impeccable logic. After all, he only runs three Scoundrels because there was no available Shadow right? I was there it happened. Denial much?? They literally would not queue one night if we played smashers, and they were the only team queing that night. Do you want screenshots? Just pointing out that this thread drama is fueled by people's inability to actually directly answer the replies they quote. Let me help. What is Synergy's obsession with one night of queuing and screenshots? Apparently this is indicative of months and months of gameplay? Edited August 3, 2013 by Classicks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marrio Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 (edited) Just pointing out that this thread drama is fueled by people's inability to quote appropriately and answer directly. What is Synergy's obsession with one night of queuing and screenshots? Apparently this is indicative of months and months of gameplay? You guys seem obsessed with synergy. This is simply a comparison of your guild trying to pressure Sifu into not running 3 of an overpowered class again just as you pressured him into not playing smashers at level 50. Edited August 3, 2013 by Marrio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classicks Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 You guys seem obsessed with synergy. This is simply a comparison of your guild trying to pressure Sifu into not running 3 of an overpowered class again just as you pressured him into not playing smashers at level 50. Again, just wondering where the "we have no shadows" argument fits in... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryannnnnnn Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 You guys seem obsessed with synergy. This is simply a comparison of your guild trying to pressure Sifu into not running 3 of an overpowered class again just as you pressured him into not playing smashers at level 50. I suppose next you're going to say people are pressuring Sifu into not using a huttball macro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laithrup Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 You guys seem obsessed with synergy. This is simply a comparison of your guild trying to pressure Sifu into not running 3 of an overpowered class again just as you pressured him into not playing smashers at level 50. no1 cares anymore dude, run 3 scoundrels, its just *********** boring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tythonians Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 I was there it happened. Denial much?? They literally would not queue one night if we played smashers, and they were the only team queing that night. Do you want screenshots? I want to see the screenshots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gomex Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 (edited) You guys seem obsessed with synergy. This is simply a comparison of your guild trying to pressure Sifu into not running 3 of an overpowered class again just as you pressured him into not playing smashers at level 50. I would also like to see screenshots Can you at least answer one question instead of pulling a sifu and backpeddle(with trans/forcespeed/chuggin trumoo) away from every single one? Please name the sents that were so terrifying good in the 50s days of everyone avoiding your 3 smash. Would like to get one last laugh Antipodes doesn't count either...obviously but just throwing it out there considering the nonsense you've been spouting. Edited August 3, 2013 by Gomex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gomex Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 no1 cares anymore dude, run 3 scoundrels, its just *********** boring. It's ok, we actually know a comp that can **** on them with a 9:1 kill ratio now. (Novare to refresh your short term memories) Tarapode's Trumoo Cleave Undefeated 8-0 with MVP/DP so far..this includes playing the best teams on their best maps...only team I haven't tested it out against is my own guild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts