PandaSuperBear Posted January 14, 2012 Share Posted January 14, 2012 I don't know if anyone has discussed this already but it's really imbalance. It seems like the faster you reach the datacore, the less time the opposing team will have to raech the datacore the next round. Doesn't anyone feel its kinda unfair? It's like if you get steamrolled the first round, might as well not play the second round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinnaminson Posted January 14, 2012 Share Posted January 14, 2012 I believe you get the same amount of time the first team took to get to the core. This makes sense as if you take any longer time than that, you would lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PandaSuperBear Posted January 14, 2012 Author Share Posted January 14, 2012 I believe you get the same amount of time the first team took to get to the core. This makes sense as if you take any longer time than that, you would lose. That... actually makes a lot of sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amp_ Posted January 14, 2012 Share Posted January 14, 2012 That's the whole point of Voidstar. lol It's a race. If you don't beat the first round, you've lost anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pazno Posted January 14, 2012 Share Posted January 14, 2012 This actually makes sense. The first round sets the bar. The second round must beat their time, or lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CyRenMBHMCM Posted January 14, 2012 Share Posted January 14, 2012 I don't know if anyone has discussed this already but it's really imbalance. It seems like the faster you reach the datacore, the less time the opposing team will have to raech the datacore the next round. Doesn't anyone feel its kinda unfair? It's like if you get steamrolled the first round, might as well not play the second round. Thats the entire point of the wz ... Whichever team does it faster wins, so second teams time is limited to how quickly the first team completes. Otherwise the game would go on pointlessly after you'd already lost. This really should be basic common sense, I worry about you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PandaSuperBear Posted January 14, 2012 Author Share Posted January 14, 2012 Thats the entire point of the wz ... Whichever team does it faster wins, so second teams time is limited to how quickly the first team completes. Otherwise the game would go on pointlessly after you'd already lost. This really should be basic common sense, I worry about you. Eat bears D< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts