Jump to content

KillaDeuce

Members
  • Posts

    254
  • Joined

Everything posted by KillaDeuce

  1. I don't think this is a good idea at all. But am not even worried about it. Personally, (maybe someone else has) I have never played a game that does anything like this with its player market. We already know that EAware is able to track item prices and such on the market. They have done nothing to restrict anything like this from happening so far. I doubt EAware will put any resources into doing anything like this in the foreseeable future. So yeah commenting anymore on it is a waste of time. Surprised I said this much. LOL
  2. In ranked pvp or with a premade possibly. But as I said above. Winning/loosing it still takes to long to play out. 3 capping falls under winning.
  3. Very very unlikely, but yes this is very true. And thank you for saying it. Made me come up with an even greater more simple fix! Increase the rate at which the objective nodes give points. Adding that to the OP.
  4. see OP edit please: Winning or loosing it takes way to long to run it's course. There needs to be a deterring factor for the winner/looser that kicks in quicker. Possibly a timer, not sure how long. The team with most points when time runs out wins. Use game matrics to get the average length of the warzone and make the timer 5 minutes less from that. Maybe there's a better solution... But I don't play this warzone just because of the fact it takes so damn long. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- edit: I came up with a great idea due to someone not agreeing with me. I love feedback, even negative! Increase the rate in which the objective nodes give points. So simple to implement too! .
  5. It has got to the point for me that I would pay $25+ per character for transfers of my server choice. And that is on top of my Sub.
  6. There is another gun same situation for the Bounty Hunter. But I won't mention it because I never see anyone else use it on my server and I like being different. I would be unset if it was thrown on the CM.
  7. I want to be able to have my health and resolve bar above my characters head Without having to have my name and guild name there.
  8. I try to think very rationally and logically. It helps keep the trolls away.
  9. I am assuming you are a Role Player and that's why you bring this up. I am not attacking you by saying this more asking. Maybe I am wrong. I think I understand what you are getting at. This could mess stuff up from a Role playing perspective. Now don't flip out on me when I say this but... RPers are a minority. Not that they should be pushed aside. But It would "most likely" be fine with the majority of players. I don't think many people pay that much attention to the class name when actually playing the game. I mean if they were not called Gunslingers and just lets say Ranged smugglers and CQC Smugglers. It would work fine. It's just the Name of the Advanced class that messes it up in this regard. So I have to ask (on a serious note), since I have never Role played before in a game before. Does the Name of the class come into play? Do you use the name of the Advanced class when you Role play? I assume you would use your characters individual name and make up a back story right? Role playing / SW Cannon I think is the one spot that I think this could be a problem. I would love to get more feedback on it. Ideas how this would mess it up and how it could be tuned to avoid it.
  10. So the game has been out for just over a year. Can anyone tell be the last time they added anything to the CE vender?
  11. No one knows what Bioware's intentions are with this 1.7 event. My opinion: It seems it is a promotion for the new illium PvP area. If that is the case why would they put it anywhere other then on illum. That would make no sense. But then this is the internet, there is no logic.
  12. I can't believe this almost went to the third page. Such a great idea. It really needs to be stickied
  13. This is just my opinion What I get out of this 1.7 announcement. Is that the event is to celebrate/promote the illum open world PvP area coming back. I believe it is suppose to be focused around PvP. This is just my speculation though.
  14. Not sure what you mean by "Least Similar?" You would just have a Gunslinger using a sniper rifle and knives (with the sniper/IO Animations) instead of the normal dual blaster pistol and shotgun animations. I prefer the sniper rifle and knives myself. edit: Actually thinking about it, the shotgun / knives animations would not even have to be switched. Cause the animations attached to them have nothing to do with the dual blasters or sniper rifle being equipped. This would make it more complex to code though. This whole idea is of course optional to all players. No one "has" to switch anything.
  15. This thread "A thousand paper cuts" is all about adding quality of life changes. It is very well thought out and explained. And has a Dev response! Please check it out. http://www.swtor.com/community/showthread.php?t=520095
  16. please add I want to be able to cancel my speeder fast travel half way to the destination. See LOTRO's horse fast travel as an example. There is a UI box that opens when traveling that you can click to dismount.
  17. Sorrry i just edited my post. But yeah. This sucks. I hope i am wrong.
  18. That is NOT new armor! On the trooper and jedi/sith picures. It is just the Imperial Operative PvP Armor in white ont he trooper. And then in black with glowies on the jedi/sith. I will be very disappointed if they try to pass this as new. And just put the one set of armor I like on my Operative and give it to other classes. I will be pissed off. I really hope this is not the case.
  19. /signed You should make a post in the other thread getting people to post here instead. To keep in on the front page.
  20. edit: nvm, I was wrong. However, having 4 players out of 8 doing nothing but stalking one player on the other team is retarded. It will put your team at an even greater disadvantage then the other team having one twink. It would will be 4vs7.
  21. I completely agree with this. Unfortunately it seems EAware has already put assets into place to make it happen. (an assumption, after reading the last state of the game) Which is quite sad. So many other things should have higher priority over this.
  22. I would love to see that too. But just swapping out between mirrored Adv. Classes makes it much more simple. And thus a greater chance of it actually happening.
×
×
  • Create New...