Very cool, I'd love to see more!

I was really excited to see this event, since I recently transferred to Shadowlands. Sadly I do not have the time nor much desire to grind out a strike on my pub toon, since I already have tons of effort poured into my Imperial characters GSF. I really don't think the minor faction imbalances are a good enough reason to exclude Imperial players.

Thank you very much Shrouded Crusader though? Hmm, I get dropping Fortunate Redoubt now that we have such high DEF numbers, but I would have figured Shield Amp Relic would be the replacement. Though I can't argue against the usefulness of the clicky.

Having a hard time understanding the number tables in relation to KBN's old format, I am math illiterate, and help would be appreciated. Thanks for the hard work so far

You are almost certainly going to want to stick with shield/absorb as your primary defenses, simply based on the way Assassin's buffs work in combat. That said I'm not sure the breakdown of the content as far as melee/ranged fights vs. force/tech fights so it may come out to be that defense has more value for that reason, although I doubt it. Not really sure atm why there appears to be zero absorption mods.

However take a look at that gun he has, looks kinda like the SL/EL-34 Plasma Assault Cannons

Gonna try out TT w/ range increase, seems like it could be pretty nasty with BLCs.

Ranged Capacitor all the way baby. It's certainly not empirical but in my experiments it has come out by far on top for BLCs.

Well aren't you just a peach....

I would imagine it is just another of the myriad of visual display bugs currently in-game. The list is absurdly long, most especially when you consider that some of the items with visual glitches are so high profile(eg: Satele Shan's Dualsaber/Shae Vizla's Chestpiece, and on and on)

Most of Wrath was using StarParse, until one or two of our members couldn't get it working on their systems and we reverted back to parsec(sadly). Has anyone else had issues with StarParse? I believe the claim was that it won't work with 32bit.

Lol dat Reign though

Not allowing someone to bring their presumably demonstrably sub-par dps character into a raid, instead of that someone's main spec/clas, who by the by was being brought for raids, is NOT being "picky", and you are most likely WAY over simplifying the situation, to assume that your raid leader not allowing your class is solely because of bias is often someone not looking beyond the obvious. I agree with a lot of your points here Shrike, and I get how frustrating it can be to have someone not seeing what you feel is apparent, but you cannot shovel all the blame to one side in any situation, and you seem to have absolved yourself entirely of blame and that's almost never true in any reality.

See it's one thing to play how you want when soloing, but when you are screwing with people by bringing that lagwagon into ops and fps that it starts to irk me. Personal choice aside or not, you do realize that you are gaining virtually nothing, and losing a TON, like 95% loss, 5% gain, I'm not trying to exaggerate or be a jerk but it really almost a total loss of viability and synergy of your abilities, to only gain a virtually invisible amount, I can almost guarantee that you would pull more threat from your comps using the right stance for your tree OR do no less dmg to mobs in full immortal spec

Daaaaaang Verain, well said, I'm pretty sure I heard you drop that mic all the way from here!

How are there still people who think Arsenal is the preferred PvE spec overall??? With the exception of a few bosses with low up times(corrupter/operator/draxus/etc) Pyro is far superior sustained dps. Arsenal fanboys and slacker raiders(some of whom i am friends with lol) who can't be bothered to learn pyros "intermediate" difficulty rotation because they can't handle their heat seem to be the only people I run into still using Arsenal as their main PvE universal spec. Pyro is imo very much a DoT spec, having burst damage from an ability, even if said ability's dmg is a large % of your dmg pie. Vengeance is most certainly a DoT spec despite having large dmg bursts from Ravage. If a talent tree gives you extra DoT's and gives you bonuses based on them/etc/etc/etc then it's a DoT spec, im not sure what further defining features it would need to be considered so if it were not already.

Excellent response to my post Verain, I really appreciate you breaking it down for me. I do agree with you for the most part, and really the whole point of my post was to see what others thought about the idea so I got the feedback I needed

Noooo! My refutation, turned to dust in the blink of an eye!!!

Thanks for going on a completely side-track diatribe of your own and then dismissing my idea without any further discussion as a 'poor idea all around', really classy way to respond to someone, disagreeing is all well and good when you actually talk about why you do, and can manage not to come across as having the tactfulness of a **** habilis

*Golfclap*

All I know is when I'm not using BLC's I use LLCs, I maxed each type on my Sting and I'll take the LLCs over the quads nowadays hands down.

....how bout they let us slot a duplicate of any ship we have slotted. For example: Slot 1: S-13 Sting with X/Y/Z components and in Slot 2: S-13 Sting with A/B/C components, Slots 3-5: Whatever else. This seems like a totally reasonable work around to not being able to modify our component load-outs once we see the map type opponents ship choices. I know I'd much rather bring a Sting with my BLCs for Domination maps, and another Sting at the ready with my LLCs for Deathmatch maps. What do you guys think?

Juggernauts are parsing excellently in dps spec and doing just fine tanking.

It's a Scout with a Rail Gun stuck onto it, therefore: I LOVE THEES. Seriously though tons of fun, can't wait to actually start upgrading/unlocking it's components!

Gunships baiting attackers back to their Capital ship is bad enough in DOM, I would not be a fan of bringing back cap turrets in TDM