Jump to content

VizMagc

Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

Reputation

10 Good
  1. Try playing the game when you're not stoned
  2. In thirty years people with fond memories of star wars, as in not the people who saw episodes 1-3 first, will either be too old to 'get' the hypothetical new films or they will have succumbed to heart/kidney failure due to obesity/adult on-set diabetes.
  3. I'm pretty sure roughly the same number of accounts are still active. There obviously aren't going to be as many people playing it at the same time now given that it's no longer the holiday season and people are working, going to school and possibly spending their free time outside of their home.
  4. He was a director... implementation was his job (and he sucked at it).
  5. So you're blaming people for the actions of other people whom they have absolutely no control over? You see why this is stupid right
  6. Huh, wait... wouldn't free gear mean that the playing field is even? Then pvp would be decided by player skill and team coordination. I mean, "terrible" players in pvp gear are still "terrible" right?
  7. I have the same problem as rage spec and Corellia isn't any easier. Since I've never used Quinn and I refuse to get him new equipment, I find the nearest pillar and run around it while taunting so that Vette can kill the elites. If an elite tries to use an AoE just use your interrupt. It doesn't take very long and I never die! If that isn't an option try interrupting and bringing medpacks/stims. Or even just going immortal and using Quinn but I get by without doing either so it isn't necessary.
  8. So you're saying that classes are perfectly balanced at the moment?
  9. Yes, rather than being objectively selfish I just felt you were being selfish. Which I could only have known if I knew everything about you and if I were an omniscient being made of pure LOGIC. You really nailed me there
  10. Facts to back it up? I feel that he is being selfish. F - E - E - L. Another new word for you to enter into your data bank.
  11. NO. Finally you've said it. The thing people are getting upset about. Someone needing a companion item without asking if it's ok to do so. That's why people are mad. So. Simple. Also when you claim to speak without emotion, purely basing every conclusion on logic and then proceed to categorize the different types of people who post in this thread, well... that's condescending http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/condescend here is a link for you brobot
  12. This is funny actually because I used 'if'. It was just short explanation of how popular opinion can and will influence and limit player behavior. Like rights in the sense of a society, they are subject to the whims of the public. I claim no knowledge of what the majority believes but I would earnestly like to believe they are not this dumb! No one has explained why I am wrong though. I am just told I am wrong and directed to the 'correct' conclusion. It's something that commonly happens when someone believes in something that they don't understand and are asked to explain it. Apparently at some point someone using an infallible logical argument that invalidated any and every conflicting opinion on this issue. I'm totally sure it is in no way subjective! Ok and for the last time why so sore about being called selfish when you are being selfish?
  13. Bioware has to cede to popular demand to maintain subscribers. If people needing for companions becomes an exceptionally large problem then they will of course limit your 'rights'. Really it could have taken you only a few seconds to figure that out but keep on with your pseudointellectual babbling. It doesn't matter how you format your text if you haven't got any content.
  14. lol I should have known that the reason this thread is so long is because of 'logical' people attempting to frame their selfish behavior as completely rational and untainted by the impurity of emotion because they cherry-pick some 'logic facts'. It's not about whether you can do it or not, it's about whether you should and I think you'll find that a lot of people don't think you should! Which is why a companion roll is necessary, you can't be trusted to use the 'need' option like everyone else uses it. Your defense, lol, is of course that you believe everyone else has the right to be just as selfish. Keep on condescending though! It's easy to make a simple argument when you ignore all of the variables that don't immediately concern you. But hey lets look at this logically, you're rolling 'need' on something that only benefits yourself. It will not come into play in a group, you don't have your companion out. When a player character receives loot, it will actually factor into the success of future groups and that benefits everyone. Not just you. Maybe that's why people get upset and call you selfish? Because you're selfish.
  15. You've only got the rights that other people allow you to have. There is nothing natural about the concept of 'rights', they're defined by society through popular opinion! If other people have a problem with one of your self-defined 'rights' then don't expect to have it for very long. I'm afraid that this is probably one of them.
×
×
  • Create New...