The answer you treat as misleadingly shortened is my mistake and i admit it. But the full answer and the short one, to me are the same, just the full has a little more PR to it. However, i did take into consideration the full answer when writing the original post. And reading the "full" answer, same like the short , i firmly believe that BW will be making more missions like the current ones , because people play them and it shows up in metrics. For me this means, more content i don't like. And somehow it seems that i gave them the wrong idea, true metrics communication. BTW. I don't work for Blizzard. Wish i did do, in my opinion its a cool company.

That is a great idea in my opinion , maybe they could announce polls true the launcher while the servers are down for maintenance.

No one would be more happy then me if you are right. My guess is they will push more content of the same basic space combat design.

"space additions" How i interpret the word "additions" is more content on the same platform and design. If they wanted to announce a design change or modification, why not say so. Additions are well ... additions.

Here is the source: http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/05/21/star-wars-the-old-republics-13-patch-revealed

The masks dont look "dreadfull".

Yes agreed, but however maybe? you should skip that 40 missions while leveling a new character, so that a clear message gets sent via "the metrics" communication system.

Reading the Q&A, and according to the logic seen there, it seems to me that Bioware applies this reasoning regarding the subject of space combat: Since "the metrics" are showing that a lot of people are playing space combat as it currently stands, that means that space combat is not to be redesigned or modified/improved. Rather, it will be expanded to more missions with the same current design. So i look at this from my perspective: Do i play space combat? - Yes Why? - Because it gives me a XP boost and credits. Do i rely enjoy it and like the way its done? - Definitely not. So, if you are like me and you are playing space combat just for the rewards, ,stop playing it, since it seems that BW will interpret this true metrics and conclude that i must like it if im playing it. Not sure if it will be understood what point im trying to make. Don't get offensive is you DO like space combat the way it is, i respect that, im just stating my own personal opinion and in no way am competent to provide some absolute strategic advice on game developmet.

In comparison to targeting in other games of this genre: - SWTOR Tab targeting feels awkward and confusing. - Even mouse targeting could be better and less clunky. Just my opinion.

Source: Eurogamer

PvP: Sure , you loose 15 minutes on WZ , but also the 20 minutes at loading screens

Try a sniper or GS ... You will stop worying about them being OP very quickly.

It doesnt matter if this guy is right or not on the tehnical side. (on how the issue will be fixed) But, the part that i agree with completely is : Load times / performance fix would drasticly improve my gaming experience I cant stress this inuf, the loading times and performance issues are ruining the game far more then anything else (IMO).

Saw a darkness build combining "raze" from madness ... And im confused now ... Raze requires light charge, but darkness is build around dark charge. So with this darkness/raze build , wich charge you use or how does it work at all ? (Or is that spec from a time before 1.1 when stance dancing was possible ...)

Thnx for the constructive answers. I said infamous only because there are so many posts about this tank spec and its combination with dps gear... Never said anything about "i-win" buttons or anything along that line, dont know why would you imply that... ?

Can anyone instruct me how this infamous (yes, that one) build actually works? (or point me to some existing guide) Thanks in advance. ------------------------------------------- -Do you use dps gear only? - Do you go with a shield or a focus? - The spec is 31/0/10?

Thnx for the suggestions, much appreciated.

I killed every background running service and application i could. Tryed game booster 3 also to do it for me. Used memCleaner to clear system cache also. Besides the 700-850 Mb memory that windows is useing the rest is completely cleared for the game.

First of, this is my PC: CPU: 2.0Ghz 3600+ AMD Manchester GPU: 6670 Radeon - 1GB 4GB Ram Windows 7 64x Directx 11 Latest GPU drivers The problem i am experienceing is: - extremely low FPS (constant stuttering) in warzones and sometimes the fleet ; even when running on ultra low settings - Strangely on planets in PVE content i can run the game in almost max high settings smoothly. What i already tryed: - Every client_settings.ini tweak i could find - Setting a graphics profile and locking AA settings from the AMD vision center - Running the game in XP (SP3) compatibility mode So far nothing helped, i still cant even dream about PvPing normaly. Please help, im desperate ...

The giggle had such good provocative style and gave the game a fun detail. I would like to see more fun and stylish details in this game, not less. The game already has inuf gray and bland in it, no need to replace characteristic fun stuff with uniform and bland content.

Hi all, im playing on the euro serv. The Ravager... So far i played republic side, and it seemed like there were very little people in the zones with me. Then one day i decided to try Empire, and was i supprised. People running everywhere, double the population per planet ... and in end a drasticly more sociable/fun gaming experience for me. My question being: - Is the disbalance i experienced a coincidence, or does it reflect a general population imbalance in this game? - If the first question is true ... How can this be resolved in the future, and does it need to be resolved at all? -(yes, from my perspective)