Think I might do this afterwork.

This shows a little bit of a flaw in Bioware's design theory and methods, at least for this event. The debuff shouldn't infect anyone who is too low level to go to Tatooine. Forcibly disrupting some ones play time is a bad move on Bioware's part, especially if they do it to new players.

Unforseen would be 'It turns out the servers crash if five people use the new version of force charge, at the same time in more than two instances of PVP zones' 'We'd of never of found that out until it hit live due to the small chance of it happening given the population of the PTS'. Unforseen is as said, unforseen, you don't see it coming. I would hope that most people could forsee the problem of not being able to test level 50 content, because you don't have any level 50 testers to test it with. Edit: Okay 5:45am here time for bed, rolling a sentinel tomorrow.

I'm sure they'll come up with away to do it better sooner or later. I'm guessing a hit level 50 and have entry level gear for your advance class, NPC on the fleets. 1-10 doesn't take anywhere near as long as 1-50 before you can test stuff.

The issues in this thread aren't of a technical nature, they are due to a lack of an orangized beta process for testing end game content. Entirely within EA's control, you honestly are looking for a different section of the EULA.

Read the next part specificlly where it continues "system failures, system outages or difficulties, especially of a technical nature, that are due to legal restrictions or other circumstances beyond its control, including but not limited to third party criminal activity." All that section does is say they aren't responsible for delays etc, caused by things that aren't their fault. It doesn't cover them for things that within its control. There may be another section in the EULA that covers them for activly breaking the software due to their own actions, but that section isn't it.

I suggest you read it again, it only covers againstt things outside of EA's control. Such as hackers bringing the servers down, an Earthquake destroying the server farm. The government of such and such a country enforcing a blanket IP ban on the game. It does not cover up for things they could of prevented.

Did you actually read any of what you copy pasted? If you do so you'll see that section doesn't even cover them for the current thread. Especially the bolded bit, they could of launched 1.2 with the RWZ in it, but they did not have an appropiate beta system in place for testing content, that makes the circumstances entirely in their control. The rest of that section just deals with your government banning and blocking the game.

The one you provided wasn't really on topic friend, that one dealt with the idea that the original seller had not actually purchased the software in question, but rather purchased a set of rental licenses. Nothing at all with an EULA protecting against software not functioning or lacking features as advertised.

EULA don't overwrite law, never have and never will. Clearly other people in this thread see the promo material as an advertisement, if some one with legal power also views them that way, then EA-Bioware would be in a lot of trouble. Hell Capcom are in more or less the same trouble right now with their latest fighter, and how it doesn't have a feature that in all the promos.

You do know that after the whole hacking incident, Sony tried to include in their EULA for Playstation network a clause in which you agreed to not sue them? If the trailer and media coverage Ea-Bioware provided counts as advertising, and if it counts as advertising or not would be up to bunch of legal wiggy types, then EA-Boware would be in trouble under various 'bait and switch' laws. For example I live in the UK, and EA-Bioware are on dodgy ground under long distance selling rules, as it is.

You know I don't even know if people bothered to try and take Blizzard to court over that. Would be interesting to know if it did. I actually can't remember a games company getting this hammered in the courts/media since Sony and their outright failures last year. Can't recall anything prior to that either.

All of this depends if a court would take the inclusion of RWZ in the 1.2 trailer, and on this website as advertisement or not. Remember no matter what they put in an EULA, they don't get to break the law.

No still eight, while classes are mirrored, advanced classes aren't. A maruder isn't a guardian. A shadow isn't an inquisitor. A vanguard isn't a mercenary. A scoundrel isn't a Sniper. However a Gunslinger is a Sniper.

Actually looking at what happened to SWG, I'd say you're wrong.