Wait you mean you don't like tier 1 social armor for approximately 11USD?

It came out Nov 2 or 3rd of 99 and was 9.99 to play at the time, increased if I recall to 12.99 maybe 2 yrs in, and the only reason it didn't do well was since it was tied to Microsoft. Zone anyone? AC2 failed since it wasn't Asherons, they tried to make WoW before WoW. I remember the beta of it and it used the silly talent trees that Blizzard eventually used. The only thing that was good about it was the engine which was ahead of its' time, and better than this pos one used here. And no I'm not a whiner or immature grownup, I was there on Asherons launch day +4.5yrs and still think of going back from time to time. Problem is nobody will make another game with Asherons systems since the casuals and raiders now all want the same bland builds eventually and standardized gear stats to show off their glowing object of the week.

To add to this, tried to submit a in-game ticket typed up a basic message about it as I'm in no hurry just would like to see them sometime and hit create ticket. Nothing showed up so have no idea if it went through or not as I hadn't had issues the past 11 months so never bothered to use the ticket system. Decided at that point to be certain so sent one through the online form through here as a backup.

Have yet at this posting to be credited the monthly recurring sub one. last paid according to my email 11-16 prior month 10-17 moving date for 30 days, no. But for the security key yes per my ledger 11-15.

No they were used for one resource: large amount of cannon fodder while acting as another front while the rest armed up for a invasion via a foothold. They helped in beating the Germans by throwing low cost/low quality equipment at a vastly over machined German army. Was much much harder to replace a piece on a panzer/tiger than a T-tank. Quantity beat out precision.

Few minor suggestions that somehow should have been in from the start of this conversion. 1) Sell individual pieces instead of sets. Frankly look at Clone Wars Adventures for their itemization and go from there. Want to purchase just a helm? boom sell it alone, same thing with gloves, boots, chest, and leg pieces. Any retailer knows it's volume that pushes your revenue not one overpriced item, in this case a whole set. 2) Subscription option revisions, right now you're currently saying without saying it the monthly subscription cost can be around $10. How did they say it? Simple subscribers get 500-600 CC's a month, and ballparking their current cost that's $5 for that amount. So make a monthly subscription option for $10 without the CC bonus to the account. And I'm just suggesting that since I've seen articles/interviews where for some reason cost alone was the issue driving people away.....yeah ok....

don't bother worrying about it right now, just save the posts of people spending $100's of dollars on it atm then laugh as you read them once the game is shutdown and they have nothing to show for the money spent. Love the rationalization some go by saying well people collect shoes or such but this is what I do. yeah but shoes are something you'll still have once the power is pulled on this game.

Atleast someone is playing the game so they can show their inflated sub numbers in their next earnings report.

Logic applied or as people call it benchmarks For the purpose we'll use the same system for each metric. Game 1 company A: runs smooth Game 2 company B: runs smooth Game 3 company C: runs smooth Game 4 company D: runs smooth Game 5 company E: powerpoint presentation ie a slideshow Now anyone can clearly see Game 5 has a issue so naturally you should blame the test system as it can't be Game 5's fault right? In the end we can all throw out system builds until we're blue in the face about to pass out but that is what it comes down to. And older engine render systems no matter how mod'ed should run better on newer hardware not worse.

The only number you need to look at is the server list to see all the ones now locked compared to what is available. Can see the PR spam probably in Feb-March 2013 time frame "To further enhance your gameplay experience we'll be merging servers once more."

I'm sorry but I'm calling BS if a trial account is still that @50 they should know whether or not they'd want to pay for a sub at that point. Here's what f2p will bring in the first few months, more a**hats who'll be gone after a few months. Fleets/servers will be ghost towns ready to be consolidated down into a couple servers east & west coast once again with people still running around looking foolish with the founder title up.

If they wanted to make it the best MMO out there they shouldn't have just copied WoW with SW elements on a bloatware of a engine, please don't argue it's the truth, and throw in interactive cutscenes. Maybe if they spent their budget developing a proper engine instead of just collecting VO audio files the game wouldn't be going f2p as people would want to pay for it.

I'm one of these who usually has been throwing out the game will be F2P by winter so this comes as no shock, but have to say you hit it on the head. Turbine switched DDO and LoTRO over to F2P games and both are healthy and still around, same with SOE with DCUO which is still running. It just comes down-to what the conversion will be for what is available to fulltime subs and what is pay as you go for the F2P accounts. Frankly it's just too bad Turbine didn't get this SW license first since they know howto do MMO's right and with a better engine but thats another subject not for here.

Nope only title they can add in now is Sucker Dec2011-X2012

Just vote with your wallet and find a new game or maybe wait for another dev to actually make a good Star Wars sandbox MMO that isn't go from point a-b rinse and repeat for your glowy-object of the night. O h don't forget one where you don't go in a loop flying around for space missions until the timer is up.