Agreed. Star Wars Star Wars is the films. The rest if a mess; parts of EU are good, others are horrible. But overall, EU is a messy, sad abomination.

A boring and obvious answer, I know, but can't be anyone else but Luke Skywalker. Of Siths, it's Darth Sidious.

To be honest, I think the whole franchise is degenerating. There is something rotten about the whole EU which I fear will actually be the end of SW one day. It's degenerating into this commercial, superficial, extreme, every-thing-has-to-be-put-into-boxes-thing (and SWTOR hasn't made things better re the last boxes part). SW is moving further and further away from what made it SW in the first place. In a way, I wish they had just stopped with the original trilogy and a few NES games. On the other hand, I'm like the next fanboy who wants more more more until the abomination has become so big it tilts over and explodes.

I think either I would be a farmer living on a peaceful Republic planet. Or I would be a Jedi Guardian fighting Sith all day long in Warzones. All or nothing, baby

No, absolutely. I've always said that George's word must be law in SW. I'm just curious about where he actually says that. Though I wonder how C-3PO could now about this in Attack of the Clones

I don't recall that. Where does he say that?

lol, you're right.

Where does it say that? I bet what you're going to give me now is actually your interpretation of events, not canon.

G-CANON does not state that Sidious was toying with Yoda. Repeating your interpretation does not magically turn it into a fact.

I've already addressed the laughing part. Go back and read.

Point out a fact that I have ignored. And no, the movie and novel does not show Sidious toying with Yoda. They show him winning. Not toying.

As you've said before. Which therefore makes it facts. No. Hate to brake it to you. Your word is not law. The fact that you have "said something before" does no make it so. Sidious wanting to make Yoda suffer instead of killing him immediately if he could, is your interpretation. As I've said before.

But it's not a fact, man. Can't you see it? You're presenting your own interpretation as a fact XD

This is simply getting ridiculous. You claim now to know so much about Sith psychology that your interpretation of a Sith's act can be claimed to be facts? Dude, you're the most far out person I've ever met.

Now you also present this subjective interpretation as being a fact! Nowhere does it say that Sidious didn't want to kill Yoda. Nowhere! It is your interpretation. Please be honest about that. My interpretation? Not matter how much Sidious would enjoy to torture Yoda, he would never risk Yoda getting away if he had the chance to kill him. Therefore Sidious would strike immediately if he had the chance to kill Yoda.

So you agree that is your subjective interpretation. Great. Thanks. So; you believe Sidious could have killed Yoda. I believe Sidious would have killed Yoda if he could, i.e. he couldn't. This it were it stands and ends then; we have each our interpretation of Sidious. At least know we are all being honest about it being interpretations. And again; the part of your comment I have quoted; this is an example of your bad and dishonest habit; you write this as if it was fact, which it isn't. Don't put it out as if you know "how Sidious and likeminded thinks" more than the rest of us. It's comical.

How about addressing the point I've made several times now; Sidious would kill Yoda instead of toying with him. So yes, Palpatine did drive Yoda back. But that is not the same as him toying with him. Part of Yoda's reason for withdrawing was probably also that he, in his wisdow, knew that this was not the day to try to destroy the Sith; if Yoda won, great. But if Yoda lost, all hope would be lost. By withdrawing, at least he would be able to regroup and eventually help Luke. So, to get back to the issue of the thread, my opinion is that Yoda is practically unbeatable in a fight till death. Therefore, in a fight against, Caedus, Yoda would win. You are entitled to disagree, but you don't have anything to refute my opinion with, except your own subjective opinion. Which is fine. But be honest about it being your opinion. Don't put it out as being facts.

I agree that Sidious had been looking forward to have a chance fighting Yoda. Read my past comment. Whas is your point with this comment?

Are you telling me that you have the authority to decide the definition of English words? From what source are you granted this authority? No. Once again, your bad habit of presenting your opinions as facts, gets in your way. First, I thought you presented your opinions as facts on purpose. But following this comment, I am wondering if you are simply not aware of it when you do it... I also notice how you keep avoiding the fact, that Sidious would rather kill Yoda than toy with him.

Where did you get this from? Is that stated anywhere as a fact? Or are you willing to admit that is your interpretation?

Ha ha, true. Obi-Wan's word is definite

I don't know what you mean. How am I turning your argument against you? That is where you are far out; Sidious was defeated that day yes, but not destroyed. You trying to re-define what being destroyed means, is far out. And apparently you too have this annyoing and rude habit of claiming to have canon on your side, when you don't. Canon does exactly say that Sidious was not destroyed.

First off, the laughing like a mental patient thing, is George liking the classical evil madman thing. And it's Palpatine happy that he finally gets a chance to fight that little green pest that's annyoed him for the last ten years. If Palpatine had been able to toy with Yoda, he would kill him instead of toying with him. Once again again, I'm not saying Palpatine didn't drive Yoda back. I'm saying when some says "Palpatine was toying with Yoda" it is not true.

You are making things up, and you need to be honest about when something is a fact, and when something is your interpretation of facts. Once again, if Sidious could have killed Yoda, he would. You cannot dispute that. And Sidious did not kill Yoda. You cannot dispute that. I know you love being a querulant, but come on, there must be a limit.

Taken to pieces, eh? Once again you take what you wish was true, and present it as if it was true. I didn't insult you or belittle your point. I pointed out that you made up something just to support your view. Can't see it's possible to belittle that as it already is as low as it can be.