Jump to content

Ganadorf

Members
  • Posts

    500
  • Joined

Everything posted by Ganadorf

  1. With this ridiculous logic, World PvP isn't balanced either, because whoever has more of Class X is going to win no matter what
  2. Sorry, I've never heard of this game "You're missing <saving space> isn't earned" With a name that long, I'm assuming it's foreign?
  3. The one good thing Blizzard is doing with Mists of Pandaria, is getting rid of Talent Trees, as we know them, altogether It's just an antiquated, boring system, in general
  4. Name one game that has Rated PvP where level 20s are bracketed with level 50s
  5. Lol I have a 50 Sorcerer, I think I know how it works; thanks for the offer, though Accept that you're wrong, and move on. You have nothing to gain by continuing this debate
  6. Incorrect, Autofacing also works in PvP, while casting; not only channeling Anyway, I agree that they need to get rid of the knockbacks, or at least put them on longer cooldowns, and give them to less Classes. This game has way too much CC in general. And autofacing shouldn't be in, period
  7. Except that's not how it works... at all Just because a Class isn't viable 1v1, doesn't mean that a composition with them in it is less viable than a composition with their 1v1 Counter Class
  8. Yeah, most people PvP to win; not to "challenge" themselves If I wanted to challenge myself, I'd become a body builder, not play a Star Wars MMO
  9. 5v5 requires every Class to be viable in one or more composition of 5; not for every Class to be balanced against each other 1v1
  10. If the Star Wars name alone could carry an MMO, Star Wars Galaxies would still exist
  11. Calling SWTOR a "WoW clone" is an insult to World of Warcraft, and Blizzard SWTOR is more like a cheap imitation of WoW, with Star Wars
  12. World of Warcraft had Raids at launch, http://www.wowpedia.org/Molten_Core Anyway, this isn't 2004. If I wanted a product that was competitive in a 2004 market, I would buy some old games on Steam for 5-10 dollars, and no sub fee
  13. That's not a financially viable course of action
  14. You have to post on a Forum that has basic features enabled
  15. 2v2 was a messy balance situation; 3v3, and 5v5 are fine Your logic is... going in many directions at once. You acknowledge that MMOs aren't balanced around 1v1, but then claim that because of that, 5v5 isn't balanced?
  16. If a subscriber cries out for help in the wilderness... BioWare doesn't care; and that's this game's biggest problem
  17. No, a single Developer said that, a long time ago; when talent trees were more complex, and Class balance was harder to maintain overall
  18. Arenas don't have a monopoly on PvP gear in WoW, either, currently. You can't even reach your weekly Conquest Point Cap, without doing Rated Battlegrounds Anyway, the popularity of Arenas in WoW speaks for itself. You can't dissuade the Community from acknowledging that Arenas are successful, and you can't somehow force people that like Arenas to stop enjoying the content. BioWare will do what makes them the most money
  19. Your logic is based on the flawed belief that everyone who leaves WoW comes to SWTOR Most people playing WoW think SWTOR is a joke; when they quit, they aren't coming here
  20. WoW has instanced Content, but it also has a massive open world Whether people choose to use it isn't the entire issue. I don't pet my cat, but I'll still be upset when she dies
  21. The Story is all in the Class Quests... which amount to about 5% of the level 20-49 process
  22. This guy gets it Sure, the vast majority of players aren't really that good, even if they're reasonably high-rated in Arena; but Glad Range is no joke
  23. There's no good reason to pay 15/month for SWTOR, once you've leveled 1-50 once
  24. That was the 90's though, this is the 2010's, part of the post Halo game market
×
×
  • Create New...