Silenceo Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 What part of Traya, lord of Betrayal, do you people not understand. The part where you betrayed a droid, but didn't really betray the droid, as it was only a charade, and then the droid helped you, and now you are helping the droid... So many plot twists! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted November 30, 2014 Author Share Posted November 30, 2014 (edited) Agreed on the No losers bracket, but immediate relaunch.But I have really cool ideas for battlegrounds. Edited November 30, 2014 by Beniboybling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canino Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 (edited) But I have really cool ideas for battlegrounds. Then do it! I just want to use one of my factions again. Either the CIC or my next one. Or should I use that one...? And Sil, send it my way. I'll gladly read over and edit it for you. I might even add my argument. Edited November 30, 2014 by Canino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canino Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 You said you'd take revenge on me last time, look how that turned out. And Sel, what happened to no hard feelings? You wouldn't take revenge on me, would you? Such sadness, much frowns. But look how close it was. And add to it I never posted my biggest argument (biggest derp of my life), I don't think you should take that win as anything. If done again, I might have bested you. And you deserve this. Every once of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 But look how close it was. And add to it I never posted my biggest argument (biggest derp of my life), I don't think you should take that win as anything. If done again, I might have bested you. And you deserve this. Every once of it Somehow I doubt any arguments would have saved you. Considering my factions are generally ganged up on, it's not going to be much different from most other matches I'm in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 But I have really cool ideas for battlegrounds. But we have a new classic mode to test Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted November 30, 2014 Author Share Posted November 30, 2014 But we have a new classic mode to test All in good time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Seriously when is this starting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silenceo Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Seriously when is this starting That reminds me, did you find those quotes? I ask merely so I can look them over before it begins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted November 30, 2014 Author Share Posted November 30, 2014 This evening GMT, once I've got some work done and can participate in earnest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 This evening GMT, once I've got some work done and can participate in earnest. Fine with me. I've got stuff to do too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silenceo Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 This evening GMT, once I've got some work done and can participate in earnest. Bah, curse you... Early evening is when I have to leave for hours... Yet I had all of yesterday free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Sil, I honestly couldn't find much other than: The Praetor II-class battlecruiser is second only to the rare Exector-Class in size, mass, and destructive potential. Nearly 4 times as long as a standard Star Destroyer, these massive ships are typically assigned as command vessels, rarely leaving their berths except in times of dire need or in the case of a full fleet engagement somewhere within their sphere of influence Sparse quotes on this thing, and those that do exist aren't about it's battle ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silenceo Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Sil, I honestly couldn't find much other than: Sparse quotes on this thing, and those that do exist aren't about it's battle ability. Hm... Alright. It still should be able to deal colossal damage though, with that much heavy weaponry. That reminds me, how does a quad compare to a dual and a dual to a single? I'm sure it isn't as simple as counting the barrels... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 (edited) Hm... Alright. It still should be able to deal colossal damage though, with that much heavy weaponry. That reminds me, how does a quad compare to a dual and a dual to a single? I'm sure it isn't as simple as counting the barrels... Indeed. As for Quad/Dual/Single, the differences aren't great, but in my opinion are as follows. The Quad, Dual and Single all have the same pushing power as turbolasers, but hit as separate bolts. Shielding, we know, is overwhelmed easier from multiple hits instead of one large hit, so a quad Turbolaser is superior to a Dual (If they both have the same reactor output) in that it breaks through shielding easier. What's more important, strength wise, is how powerful the reactor is. The more powerful the reactor strength is per weapon emplacement, the more powerful and faster recharging a weapon is. Edit: Oh, and if we count stats as canon, it's got equal defenses and shielding scattered throughout the whole vessel, and is more defensible for it's size (armor/shield/turrets) than an Imperial-II is, again, for it's size. It also has a much larger Hull Trauma intake capability. Better than an MC80 even. Edited November 30, 2014 by Selenial Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silenceo Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 (edited) Indeed. As for Quad/Dual/Single, the differences aren't great, but in my opinion are as follows. The Quad, Dual and Single all have the same pushing power as turbolasers, but hit as separate bolts. Shielding, we know, is overwhelmed easier from multiple hits instead of one large hit, so a quad Turbolaser is superior to a Dual (If they both have the same reactor output) in that it breaks through shielding easier. What's more important, strength wise, is how powerful the reactor is. The more powerful the reactor strength is per weapon emplacement, the more powerful and faster recharging a weapon is. Any quotes on the Praetor II's reactor? *goes to check wiki* Edit: Oh, and if we count stats as canon, it's got equal defenses and shielding scattered throughout the whole vessel, and is more defensible for it's size (armor/shield/turrets) than an Imperial-II is, again, for it's size. It also has a much larger Hull Trauma intake capability. Better than an MC80 even. Most intriguing... Edited November 30, 2014 by Silenceo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Any quotes on the Praetor II's reactor? *goes to check wiki* Most intriguing... No, but I found this on Vindicators: With a thickly armored hull, heavy shields, and a broad and versatile array of offensive and defensive weaponry, Vindicators are assigned as both escort and light battleships, as well as solitary cruisers sent to hunt Rebel ships and maintain order in distant regions of the empire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silenceo Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 No, but I found this on Vindicators: That certainly does help, since I didn't know their defensive capabilities much beyond their point defenses and vague quotes. By chance got the source book for that? *Don't want to add it if it would be the only quote without one* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Nerf Praetor. Praetor too stronk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 (edited) That certainly does help, since I didn't know their defensive capabilities much beyond their point defenses and vague quotes. By chance got the source book for that? *Don't want to add it if it would be the only quote without one* Both praetor and the Vindicator are from the new "Age of Rebellion" sourcebook. Edited November 30, 2014 by Selenial Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Alright, I'm all finished up with RL stuff for today, so I'm ready to go whenever everyone else is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted November 30, 2014 Author Share Posted November 30, 2014 So what flagship name were you going with again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 So what flagship name were you going with again? Sovereign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Arbitrating a Kaggath, 3.0 round the corner, ranked rating to achieve... All happening while I get the munchies to play Kotor 2. I can't ignore that game 1.8.3 just launched, new dantooine scenes and everything... must... play through! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silenceo Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Still a few last minute polishing up for the opening salvo before it begins. I won't be able to reply much however... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts