Wolfninjajedi Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 I'm pretty sure they're referring to this: Vow established from 15-30 sec then breaks it at the minute mark Ahh ok, I kinda slacked on some TCW at times so I may not get what some may post lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cs_zoltan Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 I'm pretty sure they're referring to this: Vow established from 15-30 sec then breaks it at the minute mark All he said is "I've always been greater than you". Which sounds more like ignoring her request rather than accepting it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted December 11, 2013 Author Share Posted December 11, 2013 All he said is "I've always been greater than you". Which sounds more like ignoring her request rather than accepting itThat was what I was about to say. As if the game was beneath him and the contest pointless. Arrogant yes, but he never agreed to any code of conduct or honor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 (edited) That was what I was about to say. As if the game was beneath him and the contest pointless. Arrogant yes, but he never agreed to any code of conduct or honor. Oh come on, how else can he accept the duel? It's Grevious, he wouldnt accept it openly like "Fine then" or "Sounds good" or "How about first of all we discuss the judicial consequences of going against this verbal contract?" He'd say something like "I've always been better than you" or "you don't stand a chance." Let's also note he drew his sabers after she said it, which is an informal way of saying yes. Oh, and you really do suck at replying to PM's Edited December 11, 2013 by Selenial Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfninjajedi Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Oh come on, how else can he accept the duel? It's Grevious, he wouldnt accept it openly like "Fine then" or "Sounds good" or "How about first of all we discuss the judicial consequences of going against this verbal contract?" He'd say something like "I've always been better than you" or "you don't stand a chance." Let's also note he drew his sabers after she said it, which is an informal way of saying yes. Oh, and you really do suck at replying to PM's Well when was Grevious known for fighting fair? Exactly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Well when was Grevious known for fighting fair? Exactly! Is that not the entire point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfninjajedi Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Is that not the entire point? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted December 11, 2013 Author Share Posted December 11, 2013 Who cares anyway, we are just debating semantics at this point. What Aurbere and me were arguing against is that cheating is somehow a bad thing, when Grievous gives jack all about the rules of combat. And doing what ever it takes to win is just intelligent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sell-dog Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 (edited) And doing what ever it takes to survive is just intelligent and instinct. Agree and Edited Edited December 11, 2013 by sell-dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Who cares anyway, we are just debating semantics at this point. What Aurbere and me were arguing against is that cheating is somehow a bad thing, when Grievous gives jack all about the rules of combat. And doing what ever it takes to win is just intelligent. No one ever said it wasnt smart, in fact, I said it was the smart and right thing to do. But when you flat out say he doesn't cheat.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forgon Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 I have to agree that saying he cheats when he's not shown to ever agree to any conditions is silly. By that logic, it's cheating to take advantage of a loophole as well. Grievous chose to engage in combat with Ventress by igniting his sabers and attacking; nothing more other than a gloat of his superiority. Assuming anything else for an oral contract is faulty on the offerer's part imo. Regardless, his actions did keep him alive in the war. If he wasn't such a braggart and Sidious wasn't pulling him back whenever the Seps were winning too much, I have doubts many of the Jedi he repeatedly faced would have survived. That's probably one of the things I have grown to like about his character: there's a lot of what he "could" have been and done but his flaws really crippled him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reclipsed Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 So if you said Grevious cheated in that fight, does that mean using the force in a lightsaber fight equals cheating? The force is a separate entity and is something Grevious does not possess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 So if you said Grevious cheated in that fight, does that mean using the force in a lightsaber fight equals cheating? The force is a separate entity and is something Grevious does not possess. Well, if you specifically say at the start no force powers, then yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgpocarter Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 I don't know if this adds to this topic, but remember his wheel bike in episode 3? I'd love to ride that if it was made a mount. I like this topic, fans get to discuss the ultimate droid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cs_zoltan Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 I just hate how they ruined him in TCW, how can he get from to this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrnfkbsdgfbdsgb Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 (edited) General Grievous is certainly no joke. Though more machine then sentient, he has proven himself countless times. From killing multiple Jedi simultaneously, to besting and survivng Jedi Council members to tactical thinking. Grievous was a highly skilled tactician, what he accomplished with an army of mindless *****heads (lol) is an impressive feat. Having 4 arms plus being able to fight with lightsabers in ones feet, in a hand stand, and being able to take just about any damage, would make one a very formidable opponent. Few could par Grievous in any combat sense. Sure he was vulnerable in certain areas..but then again most didnt live long enough to exploit them. Grievous is not the best, but he would prove a wonderful challenge to any world class swordmasters. Edited March 27, 2014 by wrnfkbsdgfbdsgb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts