Jump to content

The Best View in SWTOR contest has returned! ×

Kaggath Tournament - Droid Supremacy vs Undying Brotherhood


Beniboybling

Recommended Posts

Perhaps you are not familiar with the SWTOR Encyclopedia, but it provides extensive information on the capabilities of Sith Warriors. If this is a case of simple lack of information, then it is again flawed logic.

 

Right...it is. The SW don't have information that makes them all powerful, they are just good enough to make some fighting happen.

Edited by Wolfninjajedi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 753
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No R2 wouldn't be able to defeat them. They are on a lower tier compared to actual characters....unless you think some random nameless SW would be able to beat Mace Windu, Dooku, Obi-Wan, Anakin or Luke.
And this is the point at which we open our eyes and disregard this rubbish about 'tiers' and 'categories' and instead consider a little thing called EVIDENCE. Which funnily enough is quite important.

 

Sith warriors are highly trained combat specialists, yet in the end they are Sith who do not possess the skill to ascend to the rank of Lord or Darth. They simply are not powerful enough to contend with the likes of Malgus and other Sith Lords. However with the evidence we have at hand it is clear that the likes of Windu, Dooku, Kenobi, Anakin and Luke have the skills to challenge if not in some cases defeat Sith of Malgus' calibre. And therefore it stands to reason that Sith Warriors, of lesser skill, would simply not be able to match their skills.

 

As you can see all designations are grounded in reason and fact. There are reasons why some characters are named and others are not, because often only the powerful are worth talking about. However if we then decide that because of this, we can simply judge all characters by whether they are named or not, we fall into a pit of fallacy and illogicality. Disregarding evidence on the basis of our own flawed methodology.

 

Which has caused you to misguidedly believe that a Sith Warrior is no match for the likes of Durge. Yet EVIDENCE suggests that a handful would cause him some trouble. These are the facts, deal with them. Don't disregard them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this is the point at which we open our eyes and disregard this rubbish about 'tiers' and 'categories' and instead consider a little thing called EVIDENCE. Which funnily enough is quite important.

 

Sith warriors are highly trained combat specialists, yet in the end they are Sith who do not possess the skill to ascend to the rank of Lord or Darth. They simply are not powerful enough to contend with the likes of Malgus and other Sith Lords. However with the evidence we have at hand it is clear that the likes of Windu, Dooku, Kenobi, Anakin and Luke have the skills to challenge if not in some cases defeat Sith of Malgus' calibre. And therefore it stands to reason that Sith Warriors, of lesser skill, would simply not be able to match their skills.

 

As you can see all designations are grounded in reason and fact. There are reasons why some characters are named and others are not, because often only the powerful are worth talking about. However if we then decide that because of this, we can simply judge all characters by whether they are named or not, we fall into a pit of fallacy and illogicality. Disregarding evidence on the basis of our own flawed methodology.

 

Which has caused you to misguidedly believe that a Sith Warrior is no match for the likes of Durge. Yet EVIDENCE suggests that a handful would cause him some trouble. These are the facts, deal with them. Don't disregard them.

 

FINALLY Beni....evidence is the key here, you get it. What I have been trying to get across the whole time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lawlz.

 

Calm it down buddy, Plo Koon made the mistake of chopping his arms off, the Warriors would probably know exactly how to kill him and have the tools from Malgus...

 

They kinda have to chop Durge up to kill him, don't they?

 

I'm really off my game. I almost posted 'they kinda have to shop Durge up'

 

Lolz :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else notice how the representatives for the two factions being debated in this thread haven't posted in like the last ten pages?

 

Beni, could you stop arguing a largely irrelevant point and do the scoring instead, pleeeeeease? :p

 

I don't even know why we're arguing about Durge, IMO he won't defect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FINALLY Beni....evidence is the key here, you get it. What I have been trying to get across the whole time.
Lol Wolf, then perhaps you should start using it. Because so far the only argument you've being using concerning Durge vs Sith Warriors is "they are cannon fodder" (they are not) "we don't have information on them" (we do.)

 

This is not constructive debate, at all. Stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else notice how the representatives for the two factions being debated in this thread haven't posted in like the last ten pages?

 

Beni, could you stop arguing a largely irrelevant point and do the scoring instead, pleeeeeease? :p

Its already done my lady, as is the scenario. As soon as this babbling dies down I plan on posting.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol Wolf, then perhaps you should start using it. Because so far the only argument you've being using concerning Durge vs Sith Warriors is "they are cannon fodder" (they are not) "we don't have information on them" (we do.)

 

This is not constructive debate, at all. Stop.

 

Compared to Durge? Yes they are cannon fodder, because Durge has already beaten those who have feats(namely Anakin/Obi-Wan and so forth). It's not like I haven't posted evidence in this thread either for Durge anyway..so it's there.

 

When I mean cannon fodder, I am meaning they are outclassed by Durge because SW haven't shown anything that they could take on someone like him.

 

Sorry for the confusion of that, I am using CV jargin.

Edited by Wolfninjajedi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compared to Durge? Yes they are cannon fodder, because Durge has already beaten those who have feats(namely Anakin/Obi-Wan and so forth). It's not like I haven't posted evidence in this thread either for Durge anyway..so it's there.

 

When I mean cannon fodder, I am meaning they are outclassed by Durge because SW haven't shown anything that they could take on someone like him.

/sigh. Clearly their is no separating you from your use of the word cannon fodder, so I won't bother. I'd just point out that it will not be counted as a valid argument now or in the future.

 

Anyway, let's get on with the results shall we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

/sigh. Clearly their is no separating you from your use of the word cannon fodder, so I won't bother. I'd just point out that it will not be counted as a valid argument now or in the future.

 

Anyway, let's get on with the results shall we?

 

YES

 

Mother of God yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...