arunav Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 Should we expect a Scum and Villainy-themed or other WZ to come with a later patch? The expansion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZenomX Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 And people cry when they bring out an event with pvp in it. Most new content in this game is PVE related. The gree event was a surprise for me personally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucotas Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 2.1 i hope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devlonir Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 (edited) As I said in the other thread: I'm not even sure yet if Makeb itself is already on the PTS or not, or just the level cap increase, new hardmode FPs, a new Nightmare mode and a new Operation. I do not think we have seen everything yet. And to be ahead of anyone claiming: yeah but they never announced a warzone with Makeb! Neither did they announce new Hardmodes, a new Nightmare mode and a new Operation. So yeah, already the PTS has more than was announced in December. Edited February 21, 2013 by Devlonir Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jagrevi Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I think the current number of warzones already provides alot of variety in gameplay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doriru Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I think the current number of warzones already provides alot of variety in gameplay. You must be kidding... LET'S PLAY HUTTBALL!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucotas Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I think the current number of warzones already provides alot of variety in gameplay. you have 17 flashpoints, 5 raids, 7 world bosses (maybe more on makeb) all the plants, class story, faction story and you say 5 warzone is too much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucotas Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 And people cry when they bring out an event with pvp in it. Most new content in this game is PVE related. The gree event was a surprise for me personally. the event was 90% pve. 3 world bosses and 10 pve dailies, only 2 pvp dailies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vandicus Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I don't expect a warzone with the launch of RoTHC, and think 2.1 will be Titans of Industry with the next warzone most likely being 2.2. In my opinion, we should have no less than 9 warzones before claiming to have a sufficient number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharpenedstick Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I think the current number of warzones already provides alot of variety in gameplay. Except Huttball, most of the Warzones offer pretty similar play experiences. They're all cap and hold, with a little twist. If you look at WoW's first three battlegrounds, each one had a distinctly different play style. Warzone Gulch: Capture the flag Arathi Bason: Capture and Hold Alterac Valley: Massive melee with an NPC objective. Eventually they added a reinforcement track so that it ended with enough kills (I don't miss the 13 hour games...) What we need is another WZ like Huttball. Not in that it should be a Huttball type WZ, but that it should offer a play experience that is different from the others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SentinelDranoel Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Ranked matches improvements, getting premades out of every match and into premade vs premade games, cross server and anything I forgot is more important thant a new Warzone. honestly the pvp is fun, the way it is done could use an improvement. The game has changed but the pvp has not yet. Hopefully we will se something new besides another warzone this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
annabethchase Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 What we need is another WZ like Huttball. Not in that it should be a Huttball type WZ, but that it should offer a play experience that is different from the others. There's two obvious things we're missing, a death match style with no objectives other than kills with quick return to action after death. This is obviously what a ton of people want since they ignore objectives anyway. King of the hill - self explanatory but we don't have it. Yes these both require less strategy, but they'd be easy for pugs and help narrow the coordination gap against premades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_preib Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 There's two obvious things we're missing, a death match style with no objectives other than kills with quick return to action after death. This is obviously what a ton of people want since they ignore objectives anyway. King of the hill - self explanatory but we don't have it. Yes these both require less strategy, but they'd be easy for pugs and help narrow the coordination gap against premades. I don't know I think it may magnify some issues. Right now a brutally effective group can still functionally yield decent results. A good example of this would be mid control in the newest wz where I see a lot more 2-4 medal counts on the losing side then one normally sees in any others save a huttball 2-3 minute passing chain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts