Just a nonsense post... Im sure you dont have any real "development" so I can speculate too.

Nah Ut3 is better than CE3. I downloaded CE3 but havent gotten a chance to use it, I stick to UT3 because every dev is using it.

Zero fallacies? Do you know what fallacies are? Here let me show you the definition for this one: You attacked me whilst avoiding my post on the matter... That sir is a fallacy. You get nothing, good day!

Im amazed that he still posts even though he has had tons of fallacies.

An approach like what? I make 3d models... you need a high end computer for that not some ****** mac... Nice Ad Hominem fallacy you made there.

Seeing you apple people post saying its better for editing purposes is a laughable statement. I (Indie dev) use PC's for everything and will never touch a apple computer. PC's are way better than mac's and if you do not believe that you are kidding yourself.

Such an idiotic post.

Superior? no, duke nukem using unreal engine 1 from what I could find.

I see your analogies but they are wrong, Bioware bought the engine and its license to modify it, since everything is coded and you have all the files they could have changed it completely who knows if they did.

The people in the industry will know that once you start making a game on an engine, the engine is obsolete by the time you release it, you cannot be in development for ever, look at duke nukem

Yes, but Bio did gut the engine and modified it so it is basically their engine.

Dont know, but ask any developer you see and he will say the average gamer is around 35, I (inde dev) in school had a guest speaker from a studio, he was the Creative Director and he said around 35 too.

Makes no sense... They work for EA, EA sets milestones so they knew the development would be long, I am confused by your post. The UT3 is probably more expensive than HE so that could be why, plus most UT3 games are fps and not mmo's.

http://www.theaveragegamer.com/averagegamers/ Look at US, nice try kid.

Wrong thread.