One of you creative people mix me up a "In the Queue again" song set to willie nelsons "On the road again"

the game can still run in the background "tabbed out" and the pc wont need nearly as many resources to run it. This saves alot on electricity. just say'n.

Need more and/or better servers. We need 100% free server transfers. You cashed in with the release and pre-orders. Thats nothing compared to the money on the table to keep those subs. No one is going to pay a sub to sit in a queue for more then half the amount of time they have to play. Do not be reactive, be pre-active. Fix the problem NOW and give people the options to remedy this on his or her own with transfers.

pre-ordered late sept. Didnt realize I needed to do anymore then that. Read the forums and seen people talking about "registering the pre-order" and was like ***... So my date is dec 5 :mad:

this ^^^

wow these pages go fast..

I'm going to try and be optimistic and think that people at bioware are acually reading these forums. Its nice to see that there are new servers being opened. Is there any chance some of these new servers could be opened up in the same way that the access is being granted? Every day that a fresh set of invites go out, open up a new set of servers. This gives people the chance to start on a virgin server. I cant speak for every one, but, I know one of the things that I enjoy the most about a launch is the fact every one is starting at 0. This is especially important on a PvP server. This would give people the option to choose whether they want to start on a new server or a "previously populated" server. So for example. Tommorow send out a batch of invites and unlock 4-5 servers. Friday, send out a batch of invites, open up 4-5 more servers... ect.

Staggered access is a terrible idea for many reasons, some of which pointed out by the op. It really blows my mind how so many of you are defending it. I realize that some people like to kiss ***, but the sheer volume of sheep in this community is overwhelming.