BelorfinSiana Posted October 26, 2019 Share Posted October 26, 2019 Where does this fleet come from? Remember, the "machine god" blew up most of it. <- That's the spoiler I was referring to. Zakuul seceded, and I imagine most ex-pub/imp forces rejoined their home factions. Is it pretty much Viszla's Mandos now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SerraShar Posted October 26, 2019 Share Posted October 26, 2019 You got me curious, so I looked at the Wookiepedia here: https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Eternal_Fleet It say if my english is right lol that it destroyed the eternal fleet. But not the fleet we see in Onslaught. Those aren't part of the eternal Fleet that Valk was using. They looked like just ships like the ones the repb and Empire been using in ages. They could've brough more too. Outside of the Empire and the Repb, there are probably sellers of ships ? We did steal lot of money (we never got any of that boohoo) from Arcann in a chapter. Maybe the money was used to get those ships ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveTheCynic Posted October 26, 2019 Share Posted October 26, 2019 I imagine most ex-pub/imp forces rejoined their home factions That's pure (and, I think, unjustified) speculation. Pubsiders keep Admiral Aygo, and the Alliance forces seem pretty willing to be loyal to him (and through him, to you), while Impsiders get an ex-Imp to replace him, one that Aygo recommended, so I'm guessing the same thing applies there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BelorfinSiana Posted October 27, 2019 Author Share Posted October 27, 2019 Asking questions is how we learn, you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gelious Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 (edited) That's pure (and, I think, unjustified) speculation. Pubsiders keep Admiral Aygo, and the Alliance forces seem pretty willing to be loyal to him (and through him, to you), while Impsiders get an ex-Imp to replace him, one that Aygo recommended, so I'm guessing the same thing applies there. What's so unjustified about it? The original purpose of Alliance was to fight Zakuul. That purpose was fulfilled. Why would people stay? Especially after you lost Gravestone and Eternal Fleet. Especially people from Republic if you supported Empire and vica versa. If anything, the situation with Aygo clearly shows that people in your Alliance will not blindly follow you whatever you do. Edited October 28, 2019 by Gelious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveTheCynic Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 What's so unjustified about it? The original purpose of Alliance was to fight Zakuul. That purpose was fulfilled. Why would people stay? Especially after you lost Gravestone and Eternal Fleet. Especially people from Republic if you supported Empire and vica versa. If anything, the situation with Aygo clearly shows that people in your Alliance will not blindly follow you whatever you do. That's a fair question, although I would ask that you recognise that it's a question about my opinion (the key words being, "I think"), not about a concrete fact. What follows is my opinion, no more and no less. They followed the Commander initially because of a wish to fight Zakuul, as you noted. It seems to me, though, that even if some left (even among companions, some don't stay, e.g. Talos Drellik recruited by a Pubsider), there's a core of people who have transferred their loyalty to the Alliance, or maybe to the commander (that's unclear), and those people have stayed with the Alliance. The writers have written the scenario in a way that means that the Alliance has retained a fleet of ex-Pub and ex-Imp ships and a set of accompanying forces, for sure, so in the end, the question of whose opinion is better-aligned with the scenario is slightly moot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts