ArkhaanPremiare Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 (edited) Not a crappy MMO, a full fledged RPG like the original KOTOR. It could've been the sequel to the current TOR. Instead, like TOR, it will never reach its full potential story and gameplay-wise because it's part of an MMO from greedy developers. Sigh. When's Knights of the New Republic coming out? Oh yeah it's not, they're too busy think of ways to rip gamers off with this MMO crap. Edited March 13, 2016 by ArkhaanPremiare Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newyankalt Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 KOTOR 3 though.... But I guess throwing KOTFE on an out dated engine with an established subscription based game is the most profitable scenario... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djiini Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 TOR should have been its own game. Oh, yeah, spelling tip. The possessive form of that word is 'its', not 'it's'. It's = It is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArkhaanPremiare Posted March 13, 2016 Author Share Posted March 13, 2016 The possessive form of that word is 'its', not 'it's'. It's = It is. Yes yes, I'm well aware of this. It's annoying, but there was nothing I could do about it after posting it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiguelGx Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 KOTOR 3 though.... But I guess throwing KOTFE on an out dated engine with an established subscription based game is the most profitable scenario... Right this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDutchman Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Oh, but wait, EA has the exclusive SW licence, which means anything that comes out will be entirely the same as we got now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCT Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Oh, yeah, spelling tip. The possessive form of that word is 'its', not 'it's'. It's = It is. He gets a point for correctly using "should have" instead of "should of", though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts