Jarons Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I vote for #4 maybe #6 though, "Are all the names we could use" sounds like a mouthful. I was hoping for 4.For 6 just use the abbreviation AATNWCU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karadron Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Empire at War: Forums Attack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raandomname Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Empire at War: Forums Attack As long as it isnt as terrible as Forces of Corruption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PadsterPwns Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 In regards to names: Galactic Conflict Galactic Conquest (just for the memories. ) A Brutal Galaxy Faction Feuds Salvation and Destruction Lapses of Peace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silenceo Posted February 18, 2016 Author Share Posted February 18, 2016 Interesting names thus far. Also, going over V4 again, many changes that I think need to be made, but might as well toss a few out for discussion: - Victory Class Should it have both classes, or one, due to some inaccuracies? Should its price be lowered, due to it obviously not being close (weaponry wise) to those who are just a bit above it, such as the ISD, Keldabe, and such? With it going lower, it would drag a few others down as well... - Fighters in general Mostly, I am finding the number of fighters to be about where I want it to be, not outrageous but mostly still expensive than ground units will be. However, there are specific ones that need to be looked into more. Such as the high-quality ones that are not 100+. Should they be raised? Others lowered? Do tell. - Battle Ship costs Are they balanced to you, thus far? Should there be more increments? Do they all make sense? Should the SSD's be classed separately? In general, I want to know what you all think on these 3 topics in general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raandomname Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Interesting names thus far. Also, going over V4 again, many changes that I think need to be made, but might as well toss a few out for discussion: - Victory Class Should it have both classes, or one, due to some inaccuracies? Should its price be lowered, due to it obviously not being close (weaponry wise) to those who are just a bit above it, such as the ISD, Keldabe, and such? With it going lower, it would drag a few others down as well... - Fighters in general Mostly, I am finding the number of fighters to be about where I want it to be, not outrageous but mostly still expensive than ground units will be. However, there are specific ones that need to be looked into more. Such as the high-quality ones that are not 100+. Should they be raised? Others lowered? Do tell. - Battle Ship costs Are they balanced to you, thus far? Should there be more increments? Do they all make sense? Should the SSD's be classed separately? In general, I want to know what you all think on these 3 topics in general. You could start of with why you disagree with almost all of my fighter suggestions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PadsterPwns Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 - Victory Class Should it have both classes, or one, due to some inaccuracies? Should its price be lowered, due to it obviously not being close (weaponry wise) to those who are just a bit above it, such as the ISD, Keldabe, and such? With it going lower, it would drag a few others down as well... Personally I think that we should only have the Victory-II-Class. I do agree that it's price would need to be lowered, though how much would depend on factors like cargo etc. - Fighters in general Mostly, I am finding the number of fighters to be about where I want it to be, not outrageous but mostly still expensive than ground units will be. However, there are specific ones that need to be looked into more. Such as the high-quality ones that are not 100+. Should they be raised? Others lowered? Do tell. Not too sure atm, I'll think about it and get back to you once I've educated myself further. - Battle Ship costs Are they balanced to you, thus far? Should there be more increments? Do they all make sense? Should the SSD's be classed separately? I think most of the Battleship costs are fine but why is the Subjugator more expensive than the Lurcehulk Battleship? I know the Subjugator is better armed but the other Battleship has loads more cargo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenduKundalini Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 What's all this rant about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cs_zoltan Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 (edited) Padster's P-ness. Edited February 18, 2016 by cs_zoltan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PadsterPwns Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 (edited) Padster's P-ness. That's going to be my nick name for a while isn't it? Edit: I misread that. Edited February 18, 2016 by PadsterPwns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cs_zoltan Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Edit: I misread that. I doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PadsterPwns Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I doubt it. I'm surprised you have that much faith in my reading ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PadsterPwns Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 What's all this rant about? We're balancing the ship list out, sorting out the prices and in general seeing what we agree on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarons Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Interesting names thus far. Also, going over V4 again, many changes that I think need to be made, but might as well toss a few out for discussion: - Battle Ship costs Are they balanced to you, thus far? Should there be more increments? Do they all make sense? Should the SSD's be classed separately? In general, I want to know what you all think on these 3 topics in general. Well am going to comment on this personal I say we should be limited to one SSD and that ship would be considered our fleet/Faction Flagship.Instead of like some fleets multiple.We could also add the 2.0 idea of flagship and when that ship is around your fleet gets a boost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenduKundalini Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 We're balancing the ship list out, sorting out the prices and in general seeing what we agree on. Oh nothing to do with Swtor Conquest ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silenceo Posted February 18, 2016 Author Share Posted February 18, 2016 You could start of with why you disagree with almost all of my fighter suggestions. Mostly how the higher costs of fighters that you propose would go against a lot of what the balance I am aiming for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarSquirrel Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 (edited) Mostly how the higher costs of fighters that you propose would go against a lot of what the balance I am aiming for. The fighter balance is pretty good imo from what I've seen. No one has developed a fleet I could consider OP with the fighter numbers we have so I think all's good. When will we be getting to ground forces and faction-making? Edit: also, I watched all of Overlord yesterday + the specials. It needs a dub and a season two asap Edited February 18, 2016 by StarSquirrel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raandomname Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Mostly how the higher costs of fighters that you propose would go against a lot of what the balance I am aiming for. Its mainly the balance between fighters that I am concerned with. The fighter Suggestions I made were balanced around the older, more expensive fighter balance and are thus higher in absolute terms, but in relative terms there are still fighters that are too cheap compared to others. Of the top of my head the TIE Defender, Aleph, E-wing and K-wing currently are too cheap compared to other fighters. Also what about the new fighters I wanted to add and the different versions of fighters I suggested? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarSquirrel Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Its mainly the balance between fighters that I am concerned with. The fighter Suggestions I made were balanced around the older, more expensive fighter balance and are thus higher in absolute terms, but in relative terms there are still fighters that are too cheap compared to others. Of the top of my head the TIE Defender, Aleph, E-wing and K-wing currently are too cheap compared to other fighters. Also what about the new fighters I wanted to add and the different versions of fighters I suggested? E-wing is super-cheap for how good it is. Honestly it is actually better than the Epsilon-class (only slightly) yet only half the price. Ofc I wouldn't mention it if it weren't for the fact that I *know* someone will bring up its cost later and either try to belittle the E-wing or get butthurt over slipping such a good ship through at such a low price. However the K-wing has a *lot* of weaknesses and is in general a rather niche bomber. Its price is fine imo The Aleph... idk honestly, would probably have to look into it more but I think you're right, it was one hell of a machine and should probably be very expensive. The TIE Defender is fine as is. You honestly can't get more than a thousand before you start seeing diminishing returns (ie, the enemy will outnumber you by an insane amount) which means it fits perfectly in the category of elite fighter at its current cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PadsterPwns Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Do any of you guys play Plague Inc Evolved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarons Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Do any of you guys play Plague Inc Evolved? I played Plague Inc but not evolve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PadsterPwns Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I played Plague Inc but not evolve. Evolved is just the bit after the main title so I think you've played it. Is it worth getting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarons Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Sil and fellow conquest mates please come to the Inevitable docs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PadsterPwns Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Is anyone still on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarons Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Is anyone still on? Am kinda on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts