Aurbere Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 But in accordance to technical canon rules its still acknowledged by all that they arent for sure true and that technically they is no "true" version. If there is a point in the rules that are saying we are suspending some of hte canon rules for the sake of characters like this cool fine, I will deal with that, but I dont see that stated any where here... if it would be added as an adendum that not all characters are strictly 100% canon and some are the "assumed" canon based on best guess I can let it slide. Well, I generally assumed that everyone considered the most accurate representation to be Light for Pubs and Dark for Imps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowMudkip Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Quick, edit that out before Beni sees you called him yellow... We should totally start referring to them by their colour... How do you distinguish me and tune? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Quick, edit that out before Beni sees you called him yellow... We should totally start referring to them by their colour... Blech, respect your Father. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 How do you distinguish me and tune? You become one person. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cs_zoltan Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Quick, edit that out before Beni sees you called him yellow... We should totally start referring to them by their colour... It's too late, you already quoted it. What happenes now? Deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Orange Chicken? You casual. Beijing Beef only plz. ......jk I love orange chicken Gewd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selenial Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Blech, respect your Father. Wait I thought I was the mother. How *********** redneck is this family? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tunewalker Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 (edited) Well, I generally assumed that everyone considered the most accurate representation to be Light for Pubs and Dark for Imps. You want me to link canon rules and Bioware again. it is generally assumed for the purpose of ease, but technically no, there is no "most accurate" version, you want to ask bioware which options are the canon options... you want to know what they will say.... "we will not be setting a “canon” version of any class or world storyline. Your choices matter – that’s at the heart of our storytelling philosophy at BioWare." there is no "more correct" version. My Light side goodie two shoes Emperor's Wrath that wields 2 sabers is just as valid as yours and you cant tell me other wise. Cus bioware said so, all iterations are just as valid. Edited June 27, 2015 by tunewalker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Wait I thought I was the mother. How *********** redneck is this family? Hmm. Sorry, forgot. We're all good now, dear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 You want me to link canon rules and Bioware again. it is generally assumed for the purpose of ease, but technically no, there is no "most accurate" version, you want to ask bioware which options are the canon options... you want to know what they will say.... "we will not be setting a “canon” version of any class or world storyline. Your choices matter – that’s at the heart of our storytelling philosophy at BioWare." there is no "more correct" version. I'm talking about what forums assume to be the case. Unless you want to think the HoT can ragdoll kriffing Vitiate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tunewalker Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 (edited) I'm talking about what forums assume to be the case. Unless you want to think the HoT can ragdoll kriffing Vitiate? Again I dont see that as an adendum in the rules, if we are going to add that not all characters are neccisarily canon and for the case of debate we are ASSUMING certain things about characters based on non-canon game play elements as we are assuming choices for the sake of the debate, please add that to the rules and I will debate accordingly and prepare my debates accordingly. Until then small snag in the canonicity of some of the characters.... Edited June 27, 2015 by tunewalker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted June 27, 2015 Author Share Posted June 27, 2015 As I have already said, and as is generally accepted across the boards, irrespective of what is the "true story", each path represents a valid possibility, DS feats and LS feats are in that respect equally valid as evidence, as are different iterations of flashpoints, bosses etc. with different characters, we have no reason to assume that for certain paths BioWare would decide abandon the rules of their universe for funsies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowMudkip Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 You become one person. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. Oh no not that!! http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110118161111/es.starwars/images/b/bb/Fodeandbeed.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tunewalker Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 (edited) As I have already said, and as is generally accepted across the boards, irrespective of what is the "true story", each path represents a valid possibility, DS feats and LS feats are in that respect equally valid as evidence, as are different iterations of flashpoints, bosses etc. with different characters, we have no reason to assume that for certain paths BioWare would decide abandon the rules of their universe for funsies. OH SWEET... I can use Infinities Leia... awesome.... let me go look that up. SILENCEO Vader http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3344/3426912465_3948a14c69_o.jpg Edited June 27, 2015 by tunewalker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Oh no not that!! http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110118161111/es.starwars/images/b/bb/Fodeandbeed.jpg I lol'ed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted June 27, 2015 Author Share Posted June 27, 2015 OH SWEET... I can use Infinities Leia... awesome.... let me go look that up. SILENCEO Vader http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3344/3426912465_3948a14c69_o.jpgLol Infinities is non canon... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tunewalker Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 (edited) Lol Infinities is non canon... Oh but its not like they abandoned the rules of star wars for that alternate equally possible time line. its no different then saying all paths are usable for feats and flash points and planet quests. Its the same principle, thus totally legal under your CURRENT ruling, if that is your ruling you have made infinities legal. Thanks. Edited June 27, 2015 by tunewalker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cs_zoltan Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Oh but its not like they abandoned the rules of star wars for that alternate equally possible time line. its no different then saying all paths are usable for feats and flash points and planet quests. Its the same principle, thus totally legal under your CURRENT ruling. http://reactiongifs.me/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/reading-ikea-intructions-big-lebowski-confused.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted June 27, 2015 Author Share Posted June 27, 2015 (edited) The whole concept of Infinites is to abandon the rules for fun what ifs *facepalm* Infinites is non-canon Tune, find me a statement that supports anything you claim to be non-canon and I'll listen. Edited June 27, 2015 by Beniboybling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 This conversation makes me feel like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tunewalker Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 The whole concept of Infinites is to abandon the rules for fun what ifs *facepalm* Infinites is non-canon Tune, find me a statement that supports anything you claim to be non-canon and I'll listen. Hey remember that moment I said it would take a few months before people would completely forgot what I posted... i was wrong... it took like 3 hours.... at best.... http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Canon http://www.comicvine.com/profile/silver2467/blog/star-wars-canon-classes/64300/ "we will not be setting a “canon” version of any class or world storyline. Your choices matter – that’s at the heart of our storytelling philosophy at BioWare." where does it say it... EVERY WHERE LITTERALLY EVERY WHERE.... http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Emperor%27s_Wrath_(Galactic_War) Atticon This article has gameplay-based alternatives. The specific details in the body of this article are based on the assumed alignment choices of Imperial and Sith player-characters in Star Wars: The Old Republic. This presentation is based on community consensus. Alternative paths should be listed in the Behind the scenes section. http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:CT:TOR_and_video_game_canon Note on the wookie one on SEVERAL occasions it specifically states "wookie ASSUMES" Games are a special case, as generally only the stories are C-canon, while things like stats and gameplay may not be;[8] they also offer non-canonical options to the player, such as choosing female gender for a canonically male character N-Canon: Non Canon. This is fairly straightforward. N-Canon pertains to anything in the Star Wars universe of any media form that has been specifically stated as non-canon. There are a select few things that have been established as being universally N-Canon, regardless of what they originated from. The prime example of this is game mechanics (character upgrades, semantics of fights, etc.). Although the story lines in Star Wars video games are canon (barring alternate endings), game mechanics are always N-Canon. N-Canon is typically referred to in Star Wars media as Infinities. Literally everywhere.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted June 27, 2015 Author Share Posted June 27, 2015 (edited) Hey remember that moment I said it would take a few months before people would completely forgot what I posted... i was wrong... it took like 3 hours.... at best.... http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Canon http://www.comicvine.com/profile/silver2467/blog/star-wars-canon-classes/64300/ "we will not be setting a “canon” version of any class or world storyline. Your choices matter – that’s at the heart of our storytelling philosophy at BioWare." where does it say it... EVERY WHERE LITTERALLY EVERY WHERE.... http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Emperor%27s_Wrath_(Galactic_War) http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:CT:TOR_and_video_game_canon Note on the wookie one on SEVERAL occasions it specifically states "wookie ASSUMES" Literally everywhere....The absence of no one canon doesn't not make it all non-canon Tunewalker, that is a leap in logic, and a Viners assumptions in regards to game mechanics contradict Leland Chee's own statements on the matter. So I ask again, what official source has stated anything you claim to be non-canon as such? Edited June 27, 2015 by Beniboybling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 That last quote is Silver's interpretation of the canon rules. And that wookiee article you posted does not substantiate the claim. Also, Silver's thread is 4 years old. Outdated, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cs_zoltan Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 This conversation makes me feel like this Not bad. It makes me feel like... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurbere Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Not bad. It makes me feel like... Ouch. I'm sure they can fix that, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts