Jump to content

Trigon

Members
  • Posts

    163
  • Joined

Posts posted by Trigon

  1. Go to your grocery store and complain about how soup costs $2 when it used to be $1.75 and see if anyone really cares.
    For optimal results, complain to your grocer that legacy unlocks cost 50% of the initial CC purchase price. Their reaction should make you forget about cartel coins awhile.

     

    I once asked a McDonald's manager "how are the McNuggets today my good man?" and the pained expressions that danced across his face as he tried to wrap his head around a question he's never asked but directly relates to his job... it was sublime. :p

  2. Downtimes happen but this is becoming a bit too frequent for one particular server. How about addressing the underlying cause, and letting us know your plans? Or offering the hamsters profit sharing or something?
  3. I don't even disagree entirely. Choice of the word "talentless" maybe could be changed. Sometimes people just don't have the gear or the group composition or coordination. Takes time. And sometimes unexpected things happen and you lose a healer and can't get him up. Don't need 4 DPS for the fight but need your 2 healers? DPS respecs, problem solved. Might be caused by lag or a DC or something that has nothing to do with skill.
    My misquote of Kenny Powers was a joke, I honestly think anyone with the talent to respec at the right spot and time in an efficient manner has the skill to get through the content with no respec at all.

     

    I agree with the non-combat respecs inside operations though, making us zone a couple times to achieve this would be silly.

  4. *****WARNING*****

    This is a legal "cease and desist" order.

     

    The term "grinding (™)" is a legally registered trademark that is only applicable to first or second generation MMOs such as Everquest, Asheron's Call, Final Fantasy 11 and so on. The usage of "grinding (™)" to describe the lolwut leveling progression in current generation of MMOs such as SWTOR is strictly prohibited. Furthermore, such continued misuse may result in permanent brain damage and lost internet credibility.

     

    *End legal order*

    Funny yet true, good one sir. Let me wedge the SWG hologrind in there as well.

     

    I also have 7 55s and love the 12x, lvl 47-55 in 2 hours.

  5. I am not sure a 1% penalty is enough to dissuade that behavior, but it would be enough for me to stop listing publicly my nicely decorated stronghold(s).
    I disagree, any tangible benefit to making point chaser's clutterfarms private would purge a large amount of them.

     

    It may be enough to stop you from listing your nicely decorated stronghold but I'm betting the majority of decorators would gladly take the hit. Like the poster below you I would personally accept a 5% penalty to stay public, and I am very much interested in the conquest points.

     

    Like I said in my OP there is a small part of the player base (which you seem to be a part of) that are voraciously accumulating points for conquest but are equally proud of their stronghold work. My solution admittedly doesn't favor them, but there is no fix to please everyone and this is more fair (and less exploitable) than a voting system.

  6. Setting your stronghold to private before the start of a new conquest cycle gives you a 1% bonus to conquest points.

     

    For the most part this will put an end to ugly conquest warehouses on the public listings. Most sincere public listers won't mind working 1% harder than point chasers. The tiny portion of voracious point chasers who also decorate with zeal are the only ones who don't get to have their cake and eat it too.

     

    *You would be locked into this choice for the duration of that conquest cycle.

×
×
  • Create New...