Jump to content

Brinator

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

Posts posted by Brinator

  1. After playing both sides, I dug the Sith outta them!

    Been a bit of a wait since last bit of story... but it was worth it.

    As someone who plays this game ONLY for the story... I was thrilled at the quality.

    GOOD SHOW!

  2. That's funny.

     

    How hard should it have been to get Akaavi back in to the game at the same time that Torian came back, for example?

     

    I'm fairly certain you meant "Spiky wife"

    But yes, why the Phantom Menace would she not go back to being a Mando if the Smuggler's gone missing?! Actually, kinda shocked SHE wouldn't be searching for US. She IS a bounty hunter, after all.

  3. Please tell me you're being sarcastic. Pretty please. :)

     

    I like most of the new companions well enough, but it's not just about them... it's about the old companions too. Theron is one of my favourite companions - I like him a lot more than many class companions - yet most of my characters haven't touched his romance because they love their existing husbands. To me, the relationships formed during the class stories feel really hard to replace.

     

    I assume she is kidding.

     

    When you play a Bioware game... you want to feel like you've fused with the character.

    Everyone has their own Commander Shepard. Everyone has their own Hero of Ferelden and sadly, most people have their own Pathfinder that won't have a complete story (but that's not an discussion for SWTOR forums. Let's please stay on topic when responding to this comment.)

    You can't make a character forget about the connections it made.

  4. Love the descriptions!

     

    To follow on from the other side....my SI needs her piratey husband, my Agent needs her buggy husband, my Smuggler needs her jealous husband (or wait, she didn't marry him, so he ignored her....so she ran to Theron...so I guess she needs her

    traitorous BF

    ), my JK needs her sleazy husband, and my JC...well, don't care...her husband was boring and so was she. Played her for the achievement and Legendary status and never played her again (same with Trooper).

     

    By the force... I somehow forgot about my agent (I knew my counting seemed off.) I mean, he wasn't apart from his anarchy wife for really any amount of time. So that's 2 of my 8 that's been reunited.

  5. Okay, my Trooper got his wife back (finally, and he's my 2nd least favorite of my 8. Dorne started out as a rebound for Jaxo RIP)

    But my other 7 are looking EVERYWHERE for them.

    EVERYWHERE.

    My Wrath still needs his Evil Wife, my Smuggler needs his Spiky Wife, My JK needs his Padiwife, my BH needs his Cyborg Wife, and I don't really care what my JC needs.... blind bastard.

    ...

    My Inq doesn't really care where his LI is at the moment. He'd be "interested" to know why she hasn't been helping him.

    ~Thanks, Brin

     

    PS. I get how this sounds 100% sexist. But 80% of my characters are light side... when I say they NEED their wives... It's because they spend their Friday nights staring at a picture of them, crying. My Wrath is just REALLY ***** (but he has this whole "honor" thing. He's not gonna cheat unless he knows she's dead) My Inq views everyone as trash.

    If this is STILL sexist... I'm sorry, can we not talk about it? Thanks.

  6. Isn't the exact reason that he's in the Alliance because he was ordered to murder people in the Core Worlds and refused?

     

    And when Arcann starts attacking planets to lure you out, he's pretty angry and is the first to suggest helping them.

     

    Look, WE as (people in the real world,) wouldn't classify this as a need to kill without (at the very least) a trial.

     

    HOWEVER, this is a game where your character can be evil as balls. Sith pretty much means "Do as I say, or I kill the **** outta you."

     

    Koth didn't do as a DS character said, she's/he's gonna kill him.

     

    Thanks again, Bioware.

  7. Why is it a Dark Side Action to kill Koth? A dark side action may lead to Koth's decisions, but the option to kill him isn't necessary to be dark sided in nature. He's a thieving mutinous pirate who when he disagrees with his military commanders commits theft and mutiny of military property on the grounds of his own personal morality code of conduct. Under only the most idiotic and failed morality code is it ever reasonable to commit mutiny and theft and become a defector. I don't think anyone really views those actions heroically.

     

    We are in disagreement with the notion its a dark side action to kill him as a natural course of his overdue death. I support his execution and hanging and support it being a light side punishment for what the military does to thieves and mutineers. At the very least its the law of the land and no jedi really would stop a death sentence fairly imposed by a judicial process.

     

    You may have darker options to his death, but automatically making it reward you dark side points? You have to perform an action that runs counter to the dark side.

     

    Or are you someone who believes the death penalty is a bad no matter what? Thus anyone who performs it, aids in the prosecution/arrest of a dp case is automatically committing a dark side action.

     

    I rather like having them think Koth's death out for us. Let us enjoy a series of options to offing this character.

     

    The NEED to have the option to kill Koth is (in my opinion) dark side. In many scenarios, light side could possibly have the option to kill Koth... But by then he could have a whole slew of "I've redeemed myself!" actions that (in a narrative perspective) show Koth in an unarguably light view. Dark side characters need the option to kill him here anyway.

     

    I actually don't feel I disagree with you at all.

  8. Topic reminder that this is not a "Koth's character makes no sense" thread (even though it really doesn't... wait, let's NOT open that can of worms.)

     

    This is a "Let us do a thing that makes sense if we want to play our characters the way Bioware tells us how these characters-types behave" thread.

     

    Dark side players need to atleast have to option to kill Koth. This has nothing to do with Koth's motivations or morality .

  9. Look, I'm a giant sucker for themed-playlists. I'm a terrible, terrible person, I know. It's something a middleschool student may say "Yeah, that's for kids."

     

    Buuuuut, since I'm stuck with a child's mind... might as well have some fun with it.

     

    Personally, I see Valkorion's relationship with a LS Knight to match A Perfect Circle's "Passive."

     

    NOW, ON WITH THE HATE! Perhaps we'll get a few people that'll actually contribute.

  10. So, I have a bit of a theory. What if we (the character) are the reincarnation or avatar of an old god of Zakuul?

    I mean, I see more than a couple similarities between Izak and Vitiate(even though Vitiate is also known as "Slayer of Izak"... ignoring that bit for now.)

    Prophecy is brought up a few times in FE and it would bring in a couple possibilities for expanding the storyline...

     

    Idk, does this make any sense? No?

     

    Okay, I'm just gonna sit in this corner and see if this turns into a discussion.

  11. Is SCORPIO even capable of betraying the Agent? Remember the programming that was put in her on Belsavis which kept her from doing just that?

     

    Good calling that out! Don't worry, I didn't forget. They'd explain it (if she does go HAL on our butts) "It's been five years. I've figured out how to by-pass that BS."

  12. I'm surprised no one has mentioned the Scions. Heskal did promise each one would return in his or her time to the Outlander, and given that Heskal's definition of "ally" includes inviting your mortal enemy to your hideout, they also seem a logical choice.

     

    Lana is a pragmatist, but I don't see her choosing to betray the Outlander at this point.

     

    Senya might try to stop me from killing Vailyn and/or Arcann, but I don't think she'd betray me in the purest sense.

     

     

    Valkorion did disappear during Chapter 12 saying there were urgent matters that required his attention, and he hasn't been back since. Valkorion is clearly not bound to the Outlander the same way the sith force ghots from the SI story are, although Arcann perceives a need to "rid" the Outlander of his father (as he says in the Scion's hideout in chapter 8):

     

    So, I wouldn't put it past Valkorion to betray the Outlander.

     

     

    Still, SCORPIO does seem the most likely.

     

    My guess is they're gonna pop-up in Chapter 16 with the whole force enclave (where all the Force companions are doing there thing with Ghost-Marr and **** Shan)

  13. If we are speaking about voluntary betrayal. If not, then count T7 in. And almost anyone sentient among the "main characters".

     

     

    It would make sense, but it would be quite predictable.

     

    I just don't see Lana or even Theron pulling a Lando (betraying your friends because you think it's for the greater good. Likely followed by successful redemption.)

    I can see T7 being sliced to **** with the Outlander.

  14. Dear SCORPIO,

     

    Look, I get it. You're lookin' out for #1. Most of my characters understand that way of thinking well enough.

    I also know you're gonna stab us in the back with a rusty pike.

     

    But c'mon, can't you be cool? Like, just once, be cool. Just. once. One time. Be cool.

     

    Sincerely,

    the Oakes Legacy (minus Kover, my Cipher 9... 'cause he has, like, 24 different back up plans for when SCORPIO goes haywire)

×
×
  • Create New...