Korse
-
Posts
95 -
Joined
Content Type
Forums
Blogs
Events
Articles
Downloads
Gallery
Posts posted by Korse
-
-
The gearing sounds similar to how Kell Dragon was BiS at the time and could only be obtained through token drops from the most recent NM instances. At least I assume DF/DP NM will drop a new tier of gear that is only tokens. That they make future HMs easier and drop better gear than previous tier NM sounds more like a design decision to placate casual players. BioWare caters to casual players, and they always will.
As for titles, that's only relevant now, and I think it's wasted e-peen nonsense. You get a timestamped achievement when you complete a NM operation for the first time. You hear anyone talking about their raid accomplishments from EV or Denova? No. Just let people get titles. If individuals really want to feel important, they can link their accomplishments in general. Or print out a screenshot and frame it on their wall.
-
This seems weird to me. Title is nice to have, but I find it a little weird that the gear drops (81?) will be from hard mode difficulty + additional mechanics per boss? Plus, you can run two HMs per week to get 78/81 gear drops (yes, plus "additional mechanics").
It doesn't say anything about how long the NM buff lasts (1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, forever?). I prefer the current timed system. If they really want to make this stuff exclusive, just remove the trigger for the title in future updates.
"As a future date we will remove this buff..." -- Is this so much more complicated than removing the triggered update, death proc, implementations, etc that grants the title?
Hopefully no one new ever wants to play this game and have titles. This kind of says, "You want titles? **** you for not playing this game when we thought you should have played it."
-
I find it unlikely they wrote entirely new game mechanics when the engine already supports stuff like this. It's just an assumption, but I would think they added enhancements to the existing combat system to support new mechanics. I assume accuracy = accuracy and evasion = defense, then we follow the same rules as normal pvp. We all even have a shield stat with bleed through being the absorb percentage. Again, all assumptions, but it makes more sense to use the existing engine instead of writing an entirely new combat workflow.
EDIT: I also do not think that missiles care about evasion, which could mean something as simple as damage type or being a special attack.
-
...for what purpose? To keep playing the same game, over and over.
Subscription MMO. Yes, their goal is to get people to play stuff over and over again. Leveling, grinding gear, pvp, etc. It's all about spending time playing the game.
-
I love the scout. It's remarkably agile, and can literally fly circles around some of the slower craft.
Fixed. This is space. Come on, man.
-
I think the best solution is that when a player dies:
The player who got the killing blow gets the kill
All players who did damage receive an assist
If the killing blow on the dead player does not come from an attacking player (whether they suicided on purpose or just happened to run into an asteroid while trying to avoid a missile), the same effect as using /stuck in pvp should happen. That player should receive additional time on their respawn timer.
I've seen a lot of players at full health make stupid decisions running into walls. But I've also seen a lot of players at low health run into walls when you get a missile lock. The only real way to solve this is that all players are negatively impacted because some people might be abusing the benefits you get from assists/kills against the opposing players, or create logic that still rewards players for playing the game as normal. You could enhance the logic by checking if the player running into asteroids/walls has full health, is currently in missile lock, etc.
-
So...um...did devs quit or is BW getting super serious about improving this game?
Just because they have open positions doesn't mean they just created or opened these positions. I applied for two positions at BioWare (including one of these) all the way back in March. For the Tools position, I was told that a senior and tenured developer did vacate the position, but they also had plans of expanding that team by a couple members. I thought it would be cool to get into the games industry since games have been my biggest hobby since I was about four years old.
The games industry seems to have become more aligned to what I consider the more mainstream development community, but they still count years in the games industry and shipped titles as a serious consideration factor. I thought it would be really fun to get involved (and I've played the game I'd be working with since beta), but it wouldn't be almost like hitting reset on my career. Not to mention a significant salary reduction (20-30%).
-
The biggest issue from Raids is the very low survivability of the Marauder pretty much every spec.
Nearly all bosses and more and more mobs are dropping AOE damage often at their feet (or centred on the mob) or raid wide damage or general untauntable very high damage attacks or my personal bugbear dot after dot. I'm not expecting to toe to toe against bosses or tank in a fight. But the design of a lot of the fights makes melee DPS much more difficult.
This has become more noticeable of late, perhaps a stealth nerf I don't know but despite 2.0 ment to offer more survivability for the Carnage tree since 2.2 I am finding fights I used to blitz through with a DPS companion I now need to take Quinn or else I am getting low on health. I know I haven't changed except to get more 72's and set bonuses, the Mobs haven't changed and yet myself and other marauder players have noticed a lot less survivability. Now I accept glass tank, I make good use of defensive cool downs but there comes a point that just through unavoidable aoe damage is putting the healers through their paces and leaving marauder players wondering what happen in those 2 seconds to have them on half health or lower.
Melee survivability is not a Marauder issue. That is a class balance and content design issue. Warriors are actually one of the stronger melee classes in terms of survivability because they have so many defensive cooldowns.
-
The reason some people are saying ops are bad while others say they're viable for regular warzones is because there are a lot of bad players out there. As an operative (concealment or lethality), you're a stealth melee with burst. That burst is either coming out of stealth (concealment) continuing through stuns or after setting up your dots (lethality) and spamming cull on people.
For concealment, if your target can survive the first few GCDs (and by target, I mean a solo dps target, don't try killing healers or tanks), you have a chance to vanish and repeat yourself, but don't get mad when you lack the sustained dps to kill them after that.
For lethality, your best chance is tossing out dots or doing group aoe and trying to pick off low people or find people that don't move. If you find people that engage with you, cull hits hard and you can kill them before they realize you've hit the sweet spot of your rotation and just run away.
Where operatives are completely lacking in pvp is that almost anyone can turn the odds from your favor into theirs. You're a melee class in medium armor with horrible cooldowns. Shield Probe is maybe 3-5k it absorbs, Evasion is weapon damage only, so it's only useful against some classes (free cleanse is nice). If you get focused, you're probably screwed. You're very easily controlled because you're not really dangerous outside of 4m and everyone has a knockback, stun, root, snare, and movement ability. If anyone snares you and then runs away, you can't afford to use your gap closer to catch them. Just kite an op. *Just* rolling isn't that bad if you give yourself that window to let your energy come back up. However, if you're trying to dps someone while rolling, you can find yourself in a hole quick. If you see an operative attacking, just don't stand next to them. They'll either run off for 1v1 fights against bad dps or get killed in the giant melee aoe mess.
Some guy posted a video of how concealment works great against 1 target at a time. Every single target stayed engaged and failed to knock him back, snare/root, and then just stay out of his reach. And that's why they're in the video. He doesn't have any videos of a sniper knocking him back, then using heavy or leg shot when that root wears off, rolling away if you do get close before you die, and now you're farther away than when the first started and almost dead.
A lot of operatives seem pretty content just running off on their own trying to pick people off in 1v1, and that's fine. But for every second you're sitting around in stealth waiting for an advantageous situation, your team is 8v7.
Operatives are fantastic pvp healers, though. When I pvp on my op, I usually heal for things like defending or the entirety of Huttball, then switch to lethality for attacking in VoidStar. It's nice to be able to pick what the match needs and do that, but matches with good inquisitors, warriors, snipers, and mercs are going to leave you chasing a lot of targets as dps. I find that op healing has nice enough burst you can take out low targets. Shiv + EP + BS on a low target works great. Capturing nodes as a healer works just as well 1v1 as a dps. It takes longer, but every Shiv and Surgical Probe is a swing of 6-9k hp in your favor.
These things aren't the be-all, end-all. Catching people unaware happens a lot in regular warzones, but the majority of decent ranged players and warriors will just keep you outside of 4m. Good luck killing anyone that way.
-
If 2.4 is the introduction of 4v4 arenas, will 2.5 be a balance patch? Or are we just going to say that if you want to be competitive in 4v4, you need to be bringing correct composition and we can finally filter out some of those crappy pvp classes? Bringing the team size down to 4 will only magnify any class imbalances. IF there are any, of course.
You brought a PT and Operative dps into an arena? Our two snipers 20m away from each other with a tank and healer floating in the middle think that's cute.
-
ROFL @ golden lama. I can vouch for my guildmaster, he plays lethality in pve and on alot of fights (im a carn marauder) hes right behind me in dmg, even higher when he gets lucky (XD). Anyways I'd say spend a little more time with the spec before making any more judgements. Just keep at it! Any class can be viable dps in a raid if you are skiilled enough. Pvp I cant really speak for, all I know is my operative is an amazing healer in pvp. Maybe try that out if you get tired of dpsing.
I never said Operative DPS wasn't viable. I'm perfectly happy with my damage output. The only thought about Operative DPS that stood out to me worth gauging community feedback is the default duration for Tactical Advantage. If you do run TC with an Operative DPS, ask him about how he keeps his stacks up during the laser. Some Operative DPS run out as soon as the laser spawns. That's fine, it's safe. Many people have commented on my unusual methods of staying within 4m of the boss while he's channeling laser so that I can get off a 0 damage Shiv to keep my Tactical Advantage buff long enough to Shiv almost immediately after the laser (unless you got lucky with the timing and have Fatality proc).
There are a lot of similar situations on other boss fights. I just wanted to toss out the idea of making TA a flat 15 or 16 seconds. 30 seconds, 1 minute, etc, that's a long time for a buff like Tactical Advantage. The difference of 10s to 15/16s isn't going to create a giant power shift, it's mostly to try and help fill in the gaps where I believe the class and content design teams fail to understand how the variety of classes will be interacting with the content either due to lack of knowledge or understanding.
-
It appears that I'm the only player with an operative on the forums that thinks Tactical Advantage should be longer. Since no suggested shortening the buff, I have to assume that all of the viewers are perfectly content with the current duration. It appears that I'm the only person who has ever lost stacks of Tactical Advantage when someone leapt or ran away in pvp, maybe knocked back, root, run away, or lost their TA (or had to use extra Shivs just to keep TA) on fights like Titan 6 transitions, Olok disappearing, avoiding Sunder's Fixate, bad timing with Ciphas leaping, Operator IX in general, Kephess jumping into the air, TFB tentacles spawning, Golden Llama's Laser, in between droids/adds on Minesweeper, Kephess jumping into the air in another fight, Annihilation Droid knockbacks, Gharj transitions, Soa transitions, Vodal transitions, Ortol movement/roots, Mavrix Varad transitions...
I understand a lot of classes are the way they are, but I was hoping someone else might agree with my opinion on increasing the buff duration by a few seconds...
-
The safest way to Vanish is Evasion + Vanish. If your companion is out, put them in Passive mode. That drops them out of combat.
-
As an progression raider and someone who enjoys playing all of the classes, I definitely understand the desire for a parser, but I can't believe this many people are surprised that torparse is going down. It's written in ActionScript or something, has no data integrity whatsoever, and the reporting is lacking. I'm surprised the SW:TOR community never picked up on ACT. It's also surprising how many people I run into that have no idea you can view MoX parses on the website to get at least some depth of raid data.
-
I do that for my solo build, but I can't imagine doing that for end game raiding. That's 2 useless points just to open that 3 point ability, which means you have to take those from the top of Lethality or out of 6 really important points at the bottom of Concealment.
-
Before 2.0 I had done very little dps on my operative but gave it another go after the expansion release. The title of this thread is the first and largest criticism I have of the class but wanted to ensure I put in the hours and got enough experience to contribute to the conversation.
Whether in PVE or PVP, I find the short buff duration of Tactical Advantage to be the largest hindrance I have in dealing damage. Since Operative is a melee class, my effectiveness is almost entirely limited to being within 4m, but with the extensive amount of knockbacks and movement abilities of most classes in PVP (plus PVE boss mechanics added on top) it can sometimes be difficult to function with a rotation. TA is the limiting factor with either Concealment or Lethality if you plan on dpsing for more than just a few GCDs, and I really don't think the buff time has been considered well. There's no shortage of Inquisitors or Warriors in PVP, and unless one is actively engaging you and/or letting you stay near them, it's easy to lose your stacks. All of the fights in TFB, several in S&V, and even TC have moments where you can lose your stacks if you're not paying attention, lose your stacks no matter what, or will lose your stacks if you don't take extra measures to retain your stacks (usually involves a Shiv for 0 damage, on the wrong target, or rolling to Shiv). I've been in a few PVP matches where the constant onslaught of roots, snares, and knockbacks made operative dps essentially unplayable because you rarely got to build 2 stacks and have the time to use them.
I don't think making Tactical Advantage's default duration 15s (or just the 16s that the healing tree gives) causes an unfair advantage to anyone and only helps encourage the use of dps Operatives much more so than they are now. I don't think the number of stacks needs to increase, only the duration of the buff.
-
Korse is just an attention grabbing troll who obviously is in denial about the insanity that is the DGs. My raid team personally won't move on like other guilds did to just grab gear. No satisfaction in that for us. Tbh, we could care less about the gear.
Korse, do me a favor, when you stream or YT a TFB NiM DG kill, then you may speak up. Until then, learn to understand that nobody is asking for a nerf....as also STATED to your troll of a post on the actual thread about the DGs being over-tuned. I'm pretty sure yourself and your raid team aren't the same caliber of players as the top-rated raid teams worldwide and if they are saying it's an issue, guess what? your feeble attempt at saying it isn't, is ignorant and unjustified.
Increasing the enrage timer is nerfing the fight by definition. Decreasing boss health, increasing player damage output, or increasing the time before enrage are all changes that make the boss easier. I don't know why you assume that I'm a troll because I want difficult fights, to be challenged and pushed in a game that has had very little difficulty. I haven't been the only voice that has asked for more difficult content. They gave us difficult content. Do I believe that the overall difficulty level of TFB NM was increased from PTS to live? Yes. Do I believe that each boss was thoroughly tested in an attempt to cater to a certain percentage of raid teams? No. However, I don't care. Meeting the challenge is more important to me than beating a nerfed boss. Or if I beat it first, or tenth, or last. It's a challenge that will either force players to give up or to work to improve themselves. If a raid group after only a couple hours believes that there is nothing they can do to improve, then that's just arrogance and an excuse to never get better. No single player in the game is so amazing and perfect that they cannot improve themselves by working on more difficult content. Rising to meet a challenge makes you better.
I'm not the best player in this game. I make mistakes, I know I do. Everyone in my raid group makes mistakes, but I've never once heard any of them say that they could not do something to improve their performance from the previous fight. No player makes the absolute best decision about movement and which action to perform every GCD for five minutes. If you think that you do, you're delusional. However, I also do not think I'm a bad player. I don't care if you like me or not, but the childish attitude and remarks about how I cannot possibly participate in this content are unjustified. Any player with any skill level can have a valid opinion on how they like their raid content. Just because we don't agree, and you believe yourself to be a superior player does not mean that your opinion is right and I'm trolling. I happen to be a player that enjoys extremely difficult content and am frustrated to clear content in the first day. It makes me not want to waste my time in between content patches just going through the motions every week.
Several people have made comparisons of the difficulty and knee jerk reactions of the Dread Guard fight to
(I'm in there somewhere, hard to remember after you have 16 end game raid characters). It took longer than two hours to beat, but I'm proud to have been in a group that stuck with it and was rewarded with breaking the notion that it was "insanity" or impossible.You never know what you can or cannot do until you find something that you can't, right? And then what kind of person you are is defined by whether or not you accept that or try to exceed it.
-
When threads get this long people typically forget the essence of the original posts, or even the conversations that happened from pages 1-10, 10-20, etc. This thread (and the progression thread) turned into mudslinging because of people from other guilds attacking our character/our determination/our internet morals - whatever you want to call it.
No where did we claim that we cleared NiM TFB world first (this can be confusing, since TFB is the name of the instance as well as the final boss - maybe we should just call it Asation). But we sure as heck will claim world first (according to your chart here) WH, Op9, Kephess & TFB. We made a tactical choice by skipping DG - effectively forfeiting the ability to claim world first Asation clear if anyone gets DG since the other fights aren't as difficult.
We felt that the fight was overtuned and moved on - in the progression thread we even stated what we did and if you listen to our Mumble you can hear us discussing wanting to see if the rest of the instance was overtuned. What was a discussion turned into some haters/bitter people slinging mud, and then arguments and flame wars ensued. I won't be able to convince anyone to read the entire thread I'm sure, but there was a real discussion in there...somewhere.
To discredit our accomplishments because of some misguided e-morals or adhering to the unspoken rule of "linear progression" (which doesn't exist in any other MMO with NM/HM capabilities) comes off as petty.
I didn't lose the original purpose of the thread. One guild arrogantly claimed that because they couldn't beat a boss after a couple hours, it was mathematically impossible (a term that is not subjective). Apparently unable to cope with not being as perfect as they claimed, they chose to move on so they got points in a thread, exalting in celebration after defeating a bugged boss. I think those two points sum it up nicely. Having beaten 16M NM EC tanks pre-nerf (US First since you guys like to toss that kind of stuff out) and working on this fight for a few hours, I can draw parallels. At no point in that progression did I ever question whether or not it was mathematically impossible and give up. We kept at it, beat it.
-
I'm sure nobody is going to give 2 c***ps about what I say here, but what the heck.
The problem with this thread is the infighting and the attitude.
The first couple of pages sound like, "Well if WE can't do it, then it's impossible"
I went into NM TfB last night. Our group made it to the Dread Guard and failed hard. I can say with certainty that my group isn't capable of beating it at this time. But I'm not going to jump in this thread and proclaim that this means that nobody can.
Tam came in with some math. If anyone has read his posts in this forum, it's pretty obvious that he likes math and likes to figure things out in this game. Rather than providing more data (which is like food for mathematicians) the general response was, "you haven't been in the instance so your opinion is worthless"
Someone even snidely commented (Karl I think) that Tam's group would probably never even see enrage (implying that his group must be so bad that they wouldn't be able to handle the mechanics to even get to that point).
How much better would it have been to provide more actual DATA. Combat logs, or something? And less sniping and generally being nasty. Somehow that seems more productive than, "if WE can't do it, then all you poor fools are going to die in a fire, ha ha ha"
Well said.
-
I still can't believe Bioware has failed to respond to this thread/issue or to the 8m progression thread that has been lighting up since yesterday. Either Bioware isnt bothering to look at these threads, they don't care enough to respond, or they still haven't come up with a PR approved message/explanation for Dread Guards. Come on Bioware we are waiting for you
I really don't think there's a need for them to respond. Nightmare mode. That's one of those things where I imagine you can toss it over the fence and check back in a month. There might be a couple of legitimate bugs here and there, but in general this isn't stopping the average player from participating in the game. This really only seems to affecting the entitled who expected to get the NM title just for showing up.
-
The Gray Order doesn't participate in the world progression threads. We monitor them to see where we stack up. We prefer being under the radar during the "races".
That doesn't seem to stop you from thinking that you're the best players in the world. Other guilds fly under the radar, too, but that doesn't mean they lack skill. The arrogance I've seen you display in the last day indicates that given the quoted perspective, you cannot ask for the benefit of merit if you're not willing to give it.
-
You actually are arrogant for believing that at some point you will be able to defeat this encounter using current gear when all of the players who are better than you have clearly established there is a bug.
Regards,
KK
After a couple hours on DG, I enjoyed seeing the progression my raid group made through the fight. While I may sometimes be arrogant within my raid group or guild, I have an extremely difficult time boasting in general because you never know who you're talking to on the internet. Obviously, you're the best player in the whole universe so we should all do what you say.
I change my entire argument. Krazy_Karl is the best player ever. BioWare should just ask him how to do everything.
-
That's interesting since the other bosses are beatable with less than optimal gear as they are. Are we to assume that BW has a grand plan to run parallel NiM raids to compliment the gear progression, or that they are prone to raid design flaws as their track record clearly shows?
No, but I think they've created a situation in which defeating all of the Nightmare content is actually a challenge. Can the entire NM instance be defeated right now? I don't know if the TFB Tantrum bug is present in NM, but the answer for everyone right now is: I don't know. Can parts of it be defeated? Yes. That means that progress can be made. As S&V is released, there stands the possibility of more progress. As the potential for progress increases, so does the chance to beat previously "impossible" content. I like this current situation. I like a challenge. I wanted this to be hard. My raid group spent a few hours last night on the Dread Guards just to work with this difficulty of the fight. At some point, we will move on to get gear. Once we get more gear, we'll come back to this fight until we can defeat it.
We found Writhing Horror to be a joke, and (based on the available information) Operator and Kephess don't look hard. I prefer there being content in the game that I can't beat. It helps me from feeling as arrogant as a lot of people seem to always feel.
-
Where is this idea that skipping ahead to get loot is even a motivation? WHOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOO! A 75 might armoring in my bracer and a pair of boots for my sniper! BIG DMG!
There's a 75 main hand. That's probably pretty useful. Can you get it yet? No. But I'm 100% comfortable with knowing that the other half of the 75 gear will increase my chances to defeat this boss and is coming soon. The competition to defeat both NMs going on in parallel is much more interesting to me than guilds whining to nerf this boss so they can beat it in two hours. Will that upset the people that think the NM title should just be given to them? Yes.
New time-limited nightmare Dread Fortress title announced
in Flashpoints, Operations, and Heroic Missions
Posted