Jump to content

Encima

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    100

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Encima

    Why fire the game's builders?

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    If you played the game since launch, you wouldn't be asking this question. Unless you just recently started doing level 50 stuff. I've never seen so much rapid fail, I'm amazed they've stuck with the gear system currently in place for this long and I'm satisfied with it, but the utter chaos and lack of direction demonstrated in the first months of the game was mind blowing.

    Identifying your problems and fixing them.

    in Suggestion Box

    Posted

    Great catch...wow...they sure made us look like fools for believing them. "I" feel like a fool, I defended them. When people stated what crap the game was, I pointed out the polish.

     

    I enjoy playing the game honestly, so much so that I haven't kept track of all these gold nuggets apparently. I only have a few hours to play every day so there's still lots to do for me, but man, they know how to put a foot in a mouth.

    Identifying your problems and fixing them.

    in Suggestion Box

    Posted

    They didn't exactly say that, but here is what they did say: "Update 1.2 coming in the next week and then after that it's going to continue to roll out month after month. It's exciting."

    (link)

    haha no ****, you forgot the funniest part though:

    "The scope of our game updates in 2012 is going to be unimaginable. You're going to see so many changes and additions to the Star Wars Universe. It's going to be impressive."

    I have to agree with Ohlen, I never imagined their scope and I wonder if he said Star Wars Universe intentionally rather than TOR so nobody could hold him to that.

    Did you guy's know that maitenance broke something major last night?

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    i really want to know the guy in charge of internal testing ....

     

    some fun, characters on this text are fictional :rolleyes:

     

    bw dev: Hey "jack", have you already test the fix to make probes more "reliable"??

    bw internal tester: not yet, i was testing the reduced requirements on perks

    bwd: o_o for 5 hours? What you need to test there for 5 hours?

    bwit: well ... You know ... I like to be sure ...

    bwd: Oh please, that from the guy that tested the matrix cubes?

    bwit: Thats unfair :( ok, im testing it now

    (few hours later)

    bwd: Jack? Can we put a pass on qa check?

    bwit: Sorry?

    bwd: The probe fix? Is it checked?

    bwit: Errr ... Yes yes, its sure ok

    bwd: Ok, lets patch this

    (few mins after servers go live)

    bwd: Jack!!! What the hell did you test??

    bwit: Uh?? Arent perks at reduced requirements? Gues i saw them reduced i even took an screenshot

    bwd: No dam idiot, the probe fix on denova

    bwit: Oh sorry i had no time for that

    bwd: No time?? 10 hours testing a patch like this? Come let me see what you were doing

    (some log checking)

    bwd: .... 9,5 hours playing wow??

    bwit: :( dont be rude with me, i have the hardest job in ths company, you only have to code the game, i have to play it!!!

     

    qflols

    Identifying your problems and fixing them.

    in Suggestion Box

    Posted · Edited by Encima

    It does feel like only one developer is on the payroll, that would also explain the lack of QA. It's like SWG dev team pace, nothing really happens and fixes break things when they finally are pushed.

     

    I thought the comment about update every 6 weeks was pretty funny, I hope it's a joke and that they never actually said they'd do stuff every 6 weeks.

    Patch notes typo

    in General Discussion

    Posted

     

    It says: "Using the probe launcher in Denova Minefield now reveals probes more consistently."

     

    Is that some sort of Google Translation of what was meant to be "Using the probe launcher in Denova Minefield no longer reveals probes"? and is there a hint to how we're supposed to pass this encounter then?

     

×
×
  • Create New...