Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I want you to get rid of the lockout timer on regular pvp matches and flashpoints. You recently made it worse by making it a legacy lockout. Stupid! I pay for this game too. I am sick and tired of getting stuck in pvp matches with "farmers", players who deathmatch and completely ignore objectives causing a loss or throwing the match even, for numbers. I should have the right to leave so that my time is not wasted. I should not be punished with a lockout because i dont want to suffer through another loss due to farming. Obviously the losses do not count towards the daily or weekly. In reference to flashpoints, it takes forever to get a pop and then sometimes you get with players that clearly cannot clear the content. Again, I quit the fp and get punished with a lockout or massive repair bills and wasted time if I stay. You don't have the right to waste my time. Actually if you choose to ignore my request and act all ignorant like you did in the poor vague useless responses to my numerous complaints then I would like a refund for the last few mos. and I can cancel my sub early.

 

I do completely understand a lockout for ranked but cannot tolerate one for regs and fps.

Posted (edited)

except some people abused the system, which ended up wasting other peoples time, who also pay to play the game.... /shrug

 

 

Personally if they fixed it so that losses did count towards the weekly, it would be better.

Edited by DarkTergon
Posted

So people like myself who play objective should be forced to suffer through a farming regs match that is thrown or take a lockout? I clearly missed the abuse of the system all these years. /shrug

Ranked does need a lockout but regs and mm fps do not!

Posted (edited)
So people like myself who play objective should be forced to suffer through a farming regs match that is thrown or take a lockout? I clearly missed the abuse of the system all these years. /shrug

Ranked does need a lockout but regs and mm fps do not!

 

you might have been walking around with blinders on, i don't know. It's there because people complained incessantly about people leaving during matches, causing losses, etc. People who decided, it wasn't the right team, or suddenly the other team scored, etc, and didn't want to stay to see if they could change that. That's why it was brought in. If you didn't see any of that, well, that could be the blinders.

 

People who paid subs, just like you, stayed in these matches, even though, it looked like a loss, and probably became a loss, because others (ahem) bailed. At least with the new system, it gives some people pause, and maybe they don't leave, maybe they try a little harder. Maybe it would have worked better if they didn't **** it all up, by making it win only, less people might argued, and given it a go, if they left that old system in place, but who knows.

As for MM FPS, bloody right they should have a lock, if you are going to bail on the fp, you should be locked out, especially in MM's as there are less people queuing, and you bailing could leave three others stuck.

Edited by DarkTergon
Posted
Lets agree to disagree. I don't have blinders on. Logic should tell you that players do not purposefully quit a winning or competetive match. I used to leave matches when my team was farming and ignoring objective. The frustration is so real its no longer fun. Example right now I just played 3 huttballs in a row. Nobody on my team would grab the ball, only myself and then I die because they are running all over the map death matching all the while I am stunned and ganked and not one person to pass to. If I wanted to play solo or all alone i have no need for an MMO. When i speak of MM fps a prime example is when you get a tank who has half dps/tank greens on sometimes not even spec'd for tank and a healer who doesn't even know where their cleanse is. I will never agree with you on the lockouts. I have the right to be upset and to unsub which is coming up soon. I thought I would complain for once since in all these years I sat back and watched changes that were not imo for the better. I miss Vanden and Quesh Huttball but apparently too many cried they didn't. So this is my turn and I won't be seeing eye to eye with you.
Posted

You both have valid points. I think they pulled a typical BW throwing out the baby with the bathwater move.

 

They could have simply incentived winning more by increasing the number of matches required for the weekly while simultaneously increasing the win benefit.

 

I.e. you need 40 matches to win but a win counts for 4. Losses still count for 1. Numbers can be tweaked (30/3 50/5, whatever)

×
×
  • Create New...