Temeluchus Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Lol mass effect 3. Pay 60 bux, beat the game in a day and then come back to swtor unsatisfied with a horrible ending. This is roughly translated as: paid 60 dollars for Mass Effect 3, blew through and ignored most of the content, which made the game harder on me and partily or heavily contributed to an ending I didn't care for. Also, I'm incapable of enjoying any movie,book or game that does not end in everyone holding hands and dancing in a field of daisies. To answer the OP, since 1.2 is scheduled for early April and it's now mid March, something catastrophic would have to happen to cause TOR to die. I'm talking thermonuclear warfare,rogue asteroid ELE type catastrophic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sultan Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Damn, you're good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jahor Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 and lack of balancing this for most. Since release there was ONE small 'balace' where a allready gimped class was nerfed even more while the real OP classes are untoucht. All we got since release are some minor bugfixes which had been fixed BEFORE it was released. But gamers are so damn forgiving ... every BS will be defended with 'give it time' or 'do it better'. Dude, when I try to make money with a product, I WILL do it better. And they had years to do it right before release. I was blinded by the realy cool quest-videos and wanted to love this game. But I should have known better when I saw EA is involved . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vissirra Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 I seem to remember during testing when all the people now shouting that the game has to many problems were saying that they "...didn't care if it had bugs. It was good enough and we want it released now!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darka Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 The game will go on, the next time this is asked will be " Will this game survive before 1.3"Each new patch will be seen as the final nail in the coffin, or the messiah patch to end all patches, while being argued that it "all should have been in their since launch" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maoxx Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 To answer the OP, since 1.2 is scheduled for early April and it's now mid March, something catastrophic would have to happen to cause TOR to die. I'm talking thermonuclear warfare,rogue asteroid ELE type catastrophic. Actually May 15 is the day I actually see SWTOR taking a hit. *note not going to say catastrophic* Diablo 3 is coming out on that day and I know quite a few people ingame/RL along with myself that are looking forward to it heavily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darka Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Actually May 15 is the day I actually see SWTOR taking a hit. *note not going to say catastrophic* Diablo 3 is coming out on that day and I know quite a few people ingame/RL along with myself that are looking forward to it heavily. Every new game is heralded as a Killer, final nail in the coffin or to have a massive impact on every single game out there. First it was ME3, nows its DIII, then its GW2, then it will be ACIII, then something else, and so on and so on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asuka Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Diablo 3 is irrelevant. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maoxx Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Every new game is heralded as a Killer, final nail in the coffin or to have a massive impact on every single game out there. First it was ME3, nows its DIII, then its GW2, then it will be ACIII, then something else, and so on and so on I didn't say KILLER, I just said I think SWTOR will take a hit, if you don't think it will happen then you haven't been playing MMO's for very long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oakamp Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Diablo 3 is irrelevant. That is all. ^this. most kids have unreal fantasy about new games, but what happen after it really launch??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grfu Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Diablo 3 is irrelevant. That is all. I wanted Diablo 3 to be good. I really did, but I know it won't compare to Diablo and Diablo 2 because Blizzard axed the entire studio that made them, namely, Blizzard North. Without Blizzard North, there is no Diablo, in my opinion. It's not going to be the same grimdark world that is on the brink of annihilation that first enthralled us. From what I've seen, the character models and the world itself just looks alot like WoW, which is painful to my eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owynyo Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 If this game survives Tera and GW2 it will be going for a long time. Especially if WoW - Mists of Pandaria does not live up to the promises. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pairadox Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 (edited) Every new game is heralded as a Killer, final nail in the coffin or to have a massive impact on every single game out there. First it was ME3, nows its DIII, then its GW2, then it will be ACIII, then something else, and so on and so on Its all gone horribly. horribly wrong. I was translating an ancient summerian cruciform text, when I came acrossed a passage that speaks of the one game that will rule them all. Using delicate translation tools, and mah cat, Buffy I was able to determine that this game will release on December 21, 2012. Coincidence. I think not. Now pardon me, I must go add tinfoil to my hat. Edited March 16, 2012 by pairadox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blavatsky Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 all games are dying GW2TeraArcheagePlanetside2panda pokemon expansioneh , any other game you can think of.... All these games when they launch will destroy all existing games because apparently no game can surive the launch of any new game.Even though history shows that no new game appearing in the market has destroyed some other game. But never mind that. When these games I mentioned launch they will not only destroy all existing games but will also destroy themselves. Because no game can survive the release of any game. These games can't even survive their own release. Happy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NogFizzbin Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 D3 does not threaten this game. I've been in the D3 beta - it's meh. That being said there are plenty of other new mmo's or expansions coming out that could pull subscribers so bw has their job cut out for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XOrionX Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Mass Effect 3 sucks. Just sayin. i would never leave an MMORPG for a single player game anyway. That logic sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJHarmon Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 This thread implies D3 will actually be successful, which we all know, will not. Wow, we got someone here who can see into the future and he is the voice of the people. What a swell guy! /sarcasm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grfu Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 ^Please see my previous post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
celebrei Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Wait a minute swtor isnt a singleplayer rpg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blavatsky Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Wait a minute swtor isnt a singleplayer rpg? its a single player RPG you can play with friends.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GalacticKegger Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 its a single player RPG you can play with friends........ and a multiplayer RPG you can play by yourself. It's two ... two ... two games in one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Touchbass Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 .... and a multiplayer RPG you can play by yourself. It's two ... two ... two games in one. I have an easier time grouping up with Tetris on my gameboy then I do here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muzzle_flash Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Its all gone horribly. horribly wrong. I was translating an ancient summerian cruciform text, when I came acrossed a passage that speaks of the one game that will rule them all. Using delicate translation tools, and mah cat, Buffy I was able to determine that this game will release on December 21, 2012. Coincidence. I think not. Now pardon me, I must go add tinfoil to my hat. lol (also pretty sure its cuneiform and not cruciform your talking about ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natherillen Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 diablo 3 just released it's launch date to may 15. im not seeing any exact date for 1.2 patch. my sub is ending this april 2. so right now what i do is, dailies, belsavis, ilum, pvp. tbh, turning to be quite boring for me. im in swiftsure server and i can definitely see population drop after the asia pac servers released. before fleet don't go below 150 people, now the lowest i've seen is 80. in ilum 15, in belsavis 20. i know there's lots of factors why people are leaving. not enough end game content. new games are coming out, (mass effect 3) full of bugs specially in raiding fps drops still not fixed until now. maybe i should add, diablo 3 is dated. with bioware not releasing a date for 1.2 is saying something. up to now they're not sure if 1.2 is ready to be released. specially they have a growing reputation of breaking the game every patch. so now they need to be sure before giving out date for 1.2, it's a 99% smooth. so now because of all this, im not sure if im continuing to sub for 1.2. i have a tight budget, it's either 1.2 get's my money, or both 1.2 and diablo 3 gets it. It's the pre order date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConradLionhart Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 That's a load of bs. Where do you think those expectations came from? Why do players insist on arguing directly counter to their own interests? World of Warcraft had an even worse launch. Constantly bringing down servers for emergency maintenance, disrupting raiding. Yet it didn't stop it from eventually having 10m subs. It definitely survived past its first 3 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts