Ghamsar Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Just change it to you have to vote before you leave WZ at the end Keeps people from voting for each other, and your opponents would know better who was wrecking them rather than your teammates selecting Highest dmg or healer They focus on an unkillable healer...healer will get the votes...a tank causing chaos in their ranks..he'll get the votes...an operative bugging someone enough to take them out of the fight/objective...he may get a vote. Just an Idea of better dispersion based on who your enemy thinks won the game for your team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jestunhi Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 No thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackBurden Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Nah, no way. I'd never vote for a strong player because, while I may respect him/her, I don't want such a person to become stronger even faster by putting my votes for him and giving him additional comms/valour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adzzy Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 or you'd vote for the person least likely to trouble you from having additional valor/comms. You give people too much credit I'm afraid, Nepotism, selfishness, much the same result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jestunhi Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 "Vote for your enemies to make them stronger!" I don't see it catching on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Labradoraki Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 YOU EXPECT PEOPLE TO VOTE FOR THE ONE PLAYER THAT KILLED THEM 10 TIMES.... sorry they wont, they ll hate that person Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghamsar Posted February 26, 2012 Author Share Posted February 26, 2012 so if they made the "worst" player better faster, that would be a huge issue too no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jestunhi Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 so if they made the "worst" player better faster, that would be a huge issue too no? And if they vote for no one, because every single vote helps the enemy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghamsar Posted February 26, 2012 Author Share Posted February 26, 2012 And if they vote for no one, because every single vote helps the enemy? have to vote to leave, otherwise wait and unque :dunno: i thought it was a good idea, didn' t think there would be this much negativity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woshie Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 have to vote to leave, otherwise wait and unque :dunno: i thought it was a good idea, didn' t think there would be this much negativity. You have just made a fatal judgement error that is all. The internet and thus mmo's are full of *****. ***** don't and will not vote for the player that killed them 10 times or the fing healer that no one targeted and made everyone unkillable that they tried to DPS. They will not be that rational So you will end up with stupid votes and people clicking whatever to get off the screen. If MVP is that much of an issue the game should just hand it out based on a criteria or something. Or let your own team vote but force them to vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonofchiefy Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 I always vote for the guy with the lowest medal number because I assum he was trying to win and not medal whore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LanceUpercutt Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 You have just made a fatal judgement error that is all. The internet and thus mmo's are full of *****. ***** don't and will not vote for the player that killed them 10 times or the fing healer that no one targeted and made everyone unkillable that they tried to DPS. They will not be that rational So you will end up with stupid votes and people clicking whatever to get off the screen. If MVP is that much of an issue the game should just hand it out based on a criteria or something. Or let your own team vote but force them to vote. how is it not rational? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ielaz Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 if I had to vote my oponents, I wouldn't vote, end of story. GG for trying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jestunhi Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 It works fine as it is. Some people vote for the lowest medal player to boost their rewards, others vote for the best healer, some vote for top medals / dps, others vote for the people who actually seemed to contribute most regardless of scoreboard (i.e. huttball ball carriers who do not get rewarded on the scoreboard). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woshie Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 how is it not rational? Because things like Personal bias (someone annoyed you, killed you a lot,was always there healing people, laughed at you whatever), pre conceived idea's (Sorc's are so *********** op what a tosser he/she should play a real class) and so forth, would cloud judgments and votes. Hell even apathy and just clicking whatever to get off the screen would make the MVP vote kind of a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CountAthaulf Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 IF all pople would be "honorable" and "good" that would be a godd idea. For instance I´m always having fun when I play against good players and would actually award them. But well don´t be naive most peple are just as*******. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackBurden Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 (edited) I think some people who post here confuse rudeness with pragmatism. If a person doesn't vote for the best opponent, it doesn't mean that person is some sort an idiot or whatever who doesn't appreciate his enemies. Vice versa, such a person doesn't want these enemies to become even stronger, and out of purely pragmatic reasons he/she won't cast his vote for the best enemy. It's perfectly logical, nothing vulgar or unfair about it. Others can think from the position of "honour" and "fun", of course, and they have their right of voting for the best enemies. But that's not the only valid point of view. Simply speaking, no mercy for the enemy. Edited February 26, 2012 by JackBurden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vambor Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Yeah this wont work. Im going to be honest, if one guy is playing well and foccus's me down (im a healer) and just takes me out the game and i do barley any healing because this guys always on top of me, am i going to give him MVP? NOOO, im going to want to remove his brains through his nose using a fork, in spite of him actually playing well. Just being honest folks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SvnZarkSvn Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 I always vote for the guy with the lowest medal number because I assum he was trying to win and not medal whore Or he just rage quit 45 seconds into the game, so he has no medals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jizerai Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 Or he just rage quit 45 seconds into the game, so he has no medals. You can't vote for someone not currently in the warzone. On topic: It would, unfortunately, mean that most people would not vote at all. So it's basically as it is now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevesetoe Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 MVP system is dumb no matter what side has to vote. Just deal with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jestunhi Posted February 26, 2012 Share Posted February 26, 2012 MVP system is dumb no matter what side has to vote. Just deal with it. Someone doesn't get many votes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts