direblaze Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 while being stunned i thought i would task switch to write alitttle idea. Allow level 50s to select to queue as Ops leader, when they do they are placed into lower level warzones. only one level 50 is allowed perside, this player becomes the ops leader. lower levels are then matched, making sure each side has around the same level of players give or take afew levels. if no equal player levels are found lower levels will be picked, but levels closer to the level avg of the warzone is given priority. i know the idea needs alot of tweaking, but those are the bones of it, what do you think?
chton Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 while being stunned i thought i would task switch to write alitttle idea. Allow level 50s to select to queue as Ops leader, when they do they are placed into lower level warzones. only one level 50 is allowed perside, this player becomes the ops leader. lower levels are then matched, making sure each side has around the same level of players give or take afew levels. if no equal player levels are found lower levels will be picked, but levels closer to the level avg of the warzone is given priority. i know the idea needs alot of tweaking, but those are the bones of it, what do you think? Honsetly I do have to say this may be the silliest idea I've seen, congratz on that, because it's saying a lot on these forums.
direblaze Posted January 23, 2012 Author Posted January 23, 2012 (edited) So what would be the point of this change? yeah, i know its a silly idea lol. but in-between stunlocks i think you should update the idea to make it more fun, you know. give ya some thing to do. the main idea was though. to have around the same level of players, rather than one side having all 40+ and the other stuck with 10 to 30s. the level 50 ops leader was kinda like the battlefield commander idea, you know, army of scrubs and one elite commander the figure head of the group. Edited January 23, 2012 by direblaze
Recommended Posts