Close but no cigar 289.132

Lol, thinking a petition is the same as the actual numbers. I'm guessing you're the kind of guy who sees something listed for 80mil on the GTN and instantly assumes that's what it goes for as well?

Wow, just wow.

Haha, if you're going to blame these horrid, horrid answers on the wording of the questions, you're most likely just trying to tell yourself that there's still hope because you can't handle the truth or because you're so addicted you can't handle the thought of unsubbing. In all honesty, Bioware shouldn't need perfect questions to see what's wrong. And the sorc questions were fine btw, but ofc those noobs should just L2P.

I take it that todays insulting non answers to the Vanguard questions counts as crappy responses? I feel the same way you do. This is out of pure frustration. I mean, they don't even want to listen to us. It's like they live in their own little bubble.

Yes. 100% agreement. At least make them the same size of the NPCs. Not everyone checks the internet 24/7 for preview videos etc. (is the video even accessible on this site?) The preview window in game should have been fixed before this went live, that's the very least they could've done. It was known to look really large on the PTS and people flat out asked if this would be the case on live. Just ignoring it is such a dickish move, but it doesn't surprise me anymore. The reason we can't have fun stuff like this, is because of asinine fleet whiners, who haven't got the mental capacity to click terminals on fleet. We lost the Korrealis mounts because of this as well. I wouldn't count on them doing anything tbh. Not even increasing the size of the ones in the next pack. But they should fix the preview at least.

I agree 100% It should at least match the NPC size. We can thank the fleet whiners for it being this small tbh, "I NO CLICKZ TERMINALZ, MAILBOXORZ OR GTN?!?! FFS!!" Maybe I'm the only one who has no trouble accessing stuff like this no matter the Deslers and Korrealis mounts around it.

Haha, this is golden! I vote for this x 1000.

Pyro should get a talent to make it like the old cheat death in that other game instead. Can't go under 1% while the effect is on (Still only under 30%)

WE'RE FIXED!!11!1!one! "Bounty Hunter Powertech Pyrotech Increased the chance for Flame Burst to trigger Combustible Gas Cylinder in the Bursting Flame skill by 5% per rank (now 20/40/60% chance, up from 15/30/45%). Sweltering Heat has been redesigned: While Combustible Gas Cylinder is active, damage dealt by Flame Burst has a 50/100% chance to reduce the target's movement speed by 40% for 6 seconds." 5% per rank?! Yeeeah baby. And sweltering heat can't be procced from rapid shots? I feel a tingling sensation somewhere. If it really goes live in october and this is the size of the changes they'll make, not only to us, but in general, I'm throwing in the towel.

Mwhahaha

What I don't get, is the need to have exactly that armor model put on the vendor? There's plenty of models in the game to choose from, but they went for this? I see this as a blatant statement of them pissing on the the CE buyers tbh. And the CE armors doesn't even have dye slots? LOL! I don't have the CE myself FYI, but I know my brother does and I know he's not happy to say the least. My personal beef with this is simply that a promise should be kept, especially when advertising something as expensive as this CE used to be. Most of these complainers are the people who went all out trying to support the game at launch, and are still here?! And you only show them contempt? I don't get it tbh. And people who goes "BUT TEH STUFFZ IN TEH BOXXZ" - It was part of a package. People buy stuff for different reasons, amazing isn't it? I think people would be up in arms if the CE hadn't contained the game as well.....

"You missed my point. We don't have enough people willing to run" 2-3 people are willing to run, and that's not enough? And not enough to warrant a detailed post about how they see the class and what they'd like like to see done? Yeah. Right.

There's 2 on first page of this thread already.... Hyperbole much?

Nope, ofcourse I'm not, and that's totally my business. You can vote blindfolded if you'd like, I wont.

I see what you did there, I lol'd.

It's sad, but totally understandable to see you go, Mfour. In fact I'm almost happy you did so, as it makes a hell of a statement, after they have totally ignored every feedback regarding the class and in Pyros case especially shown to be so out of touch with the class and the players, that I've rarely seen anything like this before. I will keep saying this, but that Ionized Ignition nerf is some of the most bewildering I've seen in a long time. If the class rep position is just to be a puppet sitting on that title for PR reasons, then it might as well be the same. In terms of the new candidates coming forth now, I'd personally like to see much more detailed info on your thoughts on the class and your ideas of how to fix/improve it going forward. You can have super l337 experience, but if I don't agree with your views and your reasoning, I won't vote for you. It needs to be a good combination.

I know this isn't a solution, and I assure you it isn't trolling, but to save yourself the trouble I'd advice you (if your PT is geared and ready for 2.4) to reroll and play one of the stronger class/specs on a regular basis. Not only to keep your sanity in check, and add something useful to your team, but also to show Bioware via metrics that WE'RE NOT HAPPY. It might be naive of me to think it'll help, but my brother and I are playing our alts right now at 55 right now. I used to PT and he VG, and we still put in a few games on our old mains, simply because we like the class archetype a lot, but it's just too hurtful going back and do a comparison between the classes/specs. And who knows, the PTS isn't done and the world might go under and we might get more changes to make us viable. I wouldn't count on it, but still. If you want to be okayish and is dead set on playing this broken class, then I'd advice you to go Tank for PvP. It's no Juggernaut that's for sure, but it's still much, much better than playing DPS. It might even get "better" in 2.4, where Shadows won't have their "lolnodeguard" job to excell at.

Remember what happend at 2.0? It just got longer and longer and then they closed the forums But yes, it's a good idea. Anything to get our issues some attention!

So Madness sorc, a PT, another sorc and a merc? Are you guys coming up with weird combos on purpose? If the merc is healer, the other sorc is madness too and the PT is Pyro, I'm going to laugh my *** off!

I'm on the PTS, it's no typo. This is how it works now.

Maybe, but it's also a nerf to Pyro's only slow in PvP, that already have a low duration..

I just wrote this on the PT forums, but want to say it here as well. Isn't it almost like someone ****ed up majorly when redoing the talents, and made the change with 100% SS proc, 45% IP proc Ionized Ignition instead of doing it for Ionic Accelerator? That would at least make some kind of sense, even though that IA talents proc chance is the least of our worries....

Honestly the nerf to CGC proccing of Flame Burst is so weird, it almost makes you think they ****ed up with the talents and wanted to give Rocket Punch a 100% chance to proc RS while keeping FB at 45%... I'm dead serious. The change is so weird.

If I could pose a fourth question after todays PTS patch it would be one of these two. 1) Have you ever played Pyro/Assault? FYI it's the tree all to the right. OR 2) Why don't you just delete Pyro at this rate? Yeah, yeah, I know. It's QQ, but after seing the changes today, I'm just so puzzled.... It's.... I can't really wrap my mind around it.