erhm yes... thats exactly what the quote says... soooooo i dont get you, you say this is no true rng but than you say there is no true rng ... what??? anyways, lets imagine they use the hashcode of the playername as seed (just imagine, i am not saying its a good thing ) xor with another more random number like the current ticks). then obviously some players might be favored due to their name, but it still is true rng (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_number_generation) anyways lets get back to topic

it has been said before but... "Random number generators are very useful in developing Monte Carlo-method simulations, as debugging is facilitated by the ability to run the same sequence of random numbers again by starting from the same random seed." so its still true rng if you mess with the seed...

please close this thread, i wanna go home

how is it FALSE RNG?

may the seed be with you

then you must be lucky.... oh wait there is no randomness

i say chocolate 1 time and will get a tripple chocolate cookie right in my mouth!

i dont get it, whats the problem now? and most important: what is the issue they know about?

the one on the left side?

so in what way it is not RNG ? they said its broken, and some ppl still got comms out of it, so what the hell is not RNG although its broken in some way?

i got nothing. some yellow guy said its broken. so everyone got nothing. maybe? just guessing:D

calm down?

yes please.... and baaaaaacoooooon give me baaaaaaaacooooon

yes please

you may want to change the title to "Face it, the game isn't bad for me." why you want to change other peoples point of view instead? there are countless reasons why someone would say "this game is bad" and there are obviously some reasons for you why you say "this game isn't bad". so everything i see is you complaining about people who say "this game is bad" by saying "this game isn't bad". i am confused.