Now it is totally bugged, NONE of the groups are working. Not even the one what was mentioned above...

No, they have no obligations whatsoever. They already shut one of their MMOs before - see Warhammer Online which was also published by EA.

How about we completely scratch the silly holiday event and stick only to the recurring ones...

I have the same problem. I have all the chapter 3 achievements, only one bugged is the smuggler one in general tab.

Yes, I totally agree. Thank you Revan, Bastila Shan, Carth Onasi, Zaalbar, Mission Vao, Jolee Bindo and Juhani for fighting for our Freedom. And thank you for doing it the honest way - without bombing someone's home and kidnapping/torturing people. Not like the cruel Empire does...

Heh, I live in the Czech Republic, I earn more than average salary in my country - that means I earn only half of what you pay for your apartment. And I still pay 20% more for subscription than US people. To OP: It is basic free trade principle. I you do not like it, you do not have to buy it.

I completely agree with this post.

Actually, I was thinking rather differently. It should only serve as a balancing factor with +/- 1 offset: Example A: 8 Republic dps are looking for a WZ, so they will be matched with a group of 0-1 tank and 0-1 healer and 6-8 Imperial dps. Example B: 3 Republic healers and 5 dps are looking for WZ, they will be matched against a group of 2-4 healers and 0-1 tank and 3-8 dps That should help evade the unwanted match where one group has 3 healers and other side has none without influencing the queues by an unacceptable factor.

Not only that they do have the right, they also have the duty to do that in many of the European countries, because forum/game provider is responsible for the text on the forum/in the game. For example: If EA the did not ban (or take other action against) the offending player for racist content, they could be legally charged by the victim player who could ask EA for monetary compensation.

I do only a few Warzone matches per week, but this would be an improvement in my opinion. It should lead into more balanced teams.

Vast majority of items from FPs are Bind on Pickup. Twinking in this case is not an option no matter what the choice is. I do not know about operations since I run all those on master-looter system with my guild friends, there might be some nice items with Bind on Equip setting. I admit that trooper would have an advantage in this system since he could select NEED for gear for almost all of his companions. The majority of the classes would work as intended, however. In other words, it would work better then current system (in my opinion). Does not help if you are dps and ninja is tanking. He will tell you that you can wait 40minutes for another tank if you want to, while all he needs to do is push a button to get an instant invite to a FP. Not to mention that most of the people do not care if a dps got robbed of an item as long as they do not have to wait for a new tank. Also, it does not help if the ninja does not speak English (language problem happens more then I would like on European servers)

I have noticed that there is again a bunch of new "ninja complaint" type threads in the forums. I have also met this ninja phenomenon several times during my game-play. I would like to propose one easy solution to this ninja problem: There should be 3 buttons instead of the usual 2 - NEED, NEED FOR COMPANION and GREED: The NEED button would only be selectable for appropriate items depending on class. (For example: Jedi Knight would only be able to need on strength-heavy-armor) The NEED FOR COMPANION button would be also class-dependent. (For example: Sith Inquisitor would not be able to need for companion an item of aim-heavy-armor type since he has no companion that would benefit from it) The GREED button would be without restrictions. The loot priority would of course be this: NEED > NEED FOR COMPANION > GREED

I am not trying to deny other players anything, nor do I have any means to do so and nor do I have any authority over BioWare's decisions which could or would have any restrictive result to any affected players. I never said that anybody plays wrong or had any similar remark. I am simply venting my personal opinion. Never have I even tried to imply how many people do and how many people do not share my opinion, especially since I would not have any means to verify or prove such a claim.

To help you clarify the meaning of force, please, let me refer you to this Cambridge Dictionary's definition of "force", especially the examples will open whole new levels to the word for you: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/force_5 I always love when people are trying to offend other people in this matter. I have always found it very fascinating. But no worries, OCD is far more complex problem than that, it is different then just having the need to do something. The feeling of need to achieve something is a question of motivation rather than an anxiety disorder. Placing PvP quests and PvP areas on PvE server is like placing a firing range in a guns-free zone. Just saying...

I do not whine about the PvP quests in Gree event. But to be honest, I do not like them. I was always representant of the idea that there should be no open-world-PvP on PvE-servers. However, to get max reputation, players are forced to do these quests and are automatically marked PvP-flag on. Not to mention that the situation usually is that 4 groupped up PvP players gankin PvE players without any need for effort simply because they outgear them. There is not way how a group of 4 PvE players can beat group of 4 PvP players. Worst part is that the system cannot be bypassed. Because the area is free-for-all instead of republic-vs-empire and because there is not way to form a bigger group then group of four, the system does not allow to group up larger number of players to beat the annoying PvPers who block the pylon. The situation is similarly annoying the PvP players. To be honest, I do not see any reason why a PvP player should be forced to do PvE quest during any event when he is on PvP server. What I would see as better solution would be that players should be able to to chose between PvP and PvE quests and be able to reach the maximum number of reputation without the other ones. That is not the case nowdays, because of the silly one week limitation of the event. If one wants to reach the Legendary status, he must earn as much relics as possible during that time, so he can convert them to reputation in the following weeks when the event is not on...