Jump to content

BrigandsAuthor

Members
  • Posts

    33
  • Joined

Everything posted by BrigandsAuthor

  1. I think the OP has a good point, and a good idea. Add it in as an optional feature. However, I think that the OP is overreacting. Just do somthing if you're waiting. I've played Black Talon and Esseles way too many times, but I still don't mind spacebarring through the dialogue and waiting for my groupmates to catch up. But still, I've seen this problem in other posts so I think it's a big enough concern for the Devs to address. Now about the Social Point problem: just have it skip all the sentences and have your replies shown with the last sentence of NPC dialogue. So Devs: I for one don't want to see this problem again! Please add in an option to skip the majority of the dialogue without losing the chance at social points! BrigandsAuthor Edit: only include the choice for Hardmode! In Storymode, don't include it at all.
  2. Personally, I think BW needs to make changes to PvP as PvP needs, and PvE as PvE needs. One is not more important than the other! I think discussion on this point is silly, as PvP is a fairly big part of the subs; they're never going to get rid of it! I do agree that making these CC changes to improve PvP, but completely ignoring the part where it downgrades PvE is wrong and needs to be changed, but only for PvE. BrigandsAuthor
  3. This is crazy... but I like crazy. It's an idea, and just an idea. I think with a lot of thought and work, this might just work. Maybe the ability to change between normal and ghost? BrigandsAuthor
  4. I completely agree. Sometimes simple is the best. I mean, take Han Solo for instance! Smugs start out looking like him, then it's all downhill from there.... BrigandsAuthor
  5. Way too true.... I definitely agree! btw, awesome signature! BrigandsAuthor
  6. Definitely. Especially with the auto-transfers coming up, I for one will need more slots. I do not think we should have to pay for them, but if we do it should be low cost. With the characters I have, there are too many going to the same server; the Devs will need to do somthing about things like that. BrigandsAuthor
  7. I agree. Either that or let us create characters that are just for Legacy and not played on. But i like the companion idea better. Thanks for bringing this up! BrigandsAuthor
  8. Hello, I am sure this has been brought up before, but with the 30th coming up, I want to bring it up again. I have more than 8 characters going to certain destination servers, but I still want to get the rewards for transfering. I suggest that BW removes the cap on characters per server. Also, I think it would be smart to offer all your characters to go to the same destination server. Thanks, BrigandsAuthor
  9. ^ I like! Also the character creation suggestion is good too. (Edit) Either that or just add them as buyable in-game customization options. I know that i would like to change cybernetics every once in a while! Maybe cybernetic limbs/parts of limbs also? BrigandsAuthor
  10. I disagree. That would merely give the ability to move a character that has unlocked legacy onto a server that doesn't have legacy, unlocking legacy on that server. I'm suggesting the ability to connect legacies from seperate servers. I really don't think this would be hard to do. Anyone like this idea? BrigandsAuthor
  11. I've thought of a lot of things to add to legacy. One thing I've suggested is legacy spanning all servers. It has been shot down every time. So I did some thinking and came up with a fix. People always say that the name spanning all servers wouldn't work. So why not make it that you have to unlock legacy the same way on each server, but just be able to connect legacies cross-server. Another thing I thought of is a legacy bank. Same as Guild Banks, but for your legacy. I think that you should be able to put bound items into it. I know that they have 'bind to legacy' items, but i have NEVER seen one. There are many items that i want to use on character X, and then on character Y, but the item is now bound to character X, who cannot give it to character Y. I'm sure some people agree. BrigandsAuthor
  12. True. Which is why I posted above about custom story zones. Anything else someone has on that, please tell me! BrigandsAuthor
  13. I too have wanted to do this, but I don't think it would work in the class stortlines. I've been thinking about this lately, and trying to figure it out. Maybe a legacy story zone where you can create a story using your characters and NPCs. I'm not quite sure exactly how this would work, but think that it would be really cool if it did. I also think it would be best if you could use your characters from multiple servers and/or other players' characters. BrigandsAuthor
  14. I like the idea. I think that it should be craftable, or even buyable, and have multiple speeds. For example, one for lv 25, lv 30, lv 35, etc. BrigandsAuthor
  15. NO! Just add them in character creation. Why not? However, I do agree with the language thing. That seems kinda obvious! There are all these threads about which species to add and the lists are 50+ long! Just add 5-7... sheesh. BrigandsAuthor
  16. I agree. I think that legacy needs to span all servers, even without sharing a name. Make it so you can have different legacy names on different servers, but still connect them. I've heard many times the thing about someone having your name on a different server, so just be able to change it on that server. I think that's pretty simple. BrigandsAuthor
  17. Exactly. The whole point of AC seems, to me at least, to be to give you different saber choices. If you want to dw, roll a maruader or sentinel. That's not the designers' problem, it's their solution. This whole idea SOUNDS cool, but, as has been said before, has too many cons and too much work for too little gain. Now on the other hand, i think it would work to be able to wield backhand... Maybe a toggle for each saber equipped? BrigandsAuthor
  18. Before i saw this post, i made one of my own. I really think this would be a good feature to add, but not through legacy or character creation. Have it be buyable items that you equip from your inventory. Nothing more, nothing less. Here's my other post. "Great game BW, but why in the world would humans be the only race that's able to be cyborgs? Shouldn't we have cyborg Chiss, cyborg Sith PureBloods, cyborg Twileks, etc? At least let us buy Cybernetic Customization Packs or something for other races. Also, ADD CYBERNETIC LIMBS/PARTS OF LIMBS!!! Think of Anikin/Darth Vader. He's got two robotic forearms, and two robotic lower legs. It doesn't have to add any armor or skills, but could. I think that it should include ALL the cybernetic choices from ALL classes, with the addition of limbs. Maybe have a toggle for 'show cybernetics,' to toggle gear over limbs on or off. It could be an extension of the panel generically bound to 'C' or another panel. How does that sound? I'll post anything else if i think of it. BrigandsAuthor :wea_02:"
  19. Maybe a 1.3 or something a bit further down the line. Also, I do agree that you shouldn't be able to go back on a hand for example, and regrow your hand, but adding (eg. going from hand to arm) should be fine. BrigandsAuthor
  20. Great game BW, but why in the world would humans be the only race that's able to be cyborgs? Shouldn't we have cyborg Chiss, cyborg Sith PureBloods, cyborg Twileks, etc? At least let us buy Cybernetic Customization Packs or something for other races. Also, ADD CYBERNETIC LIMBS/PARTS OF LIMBS!!! Think of Anikin/Darth Vader. He's got two robotic forearms, and two robotic lower legs. It doesn't have to add any armor or skills, but could. I think that it should include ALL the cybernetic choices from ALL classes, with the addition of limbs. Maybe have a toggle for 'show cybernetics,' to toggle gear over limbs on or off. It could be an extension of the panel generically bound to 'C' or another panel. How does that sound? I'll post anything else if i think of it. BrigandsAuthor
  21. You make a good point, however, my point is that even with 16 per legacy, you cant really make a full family. As i said before, my family is relatively small compared to others i know, and it is still over 16. That is why i think they need to span all servers. I also think that the 'Legacy name might be taken on another server' problem could be easily fixed. Personally, i think that the chance of another person having the EXACT SAME name as you is pretty slim. In the slight chance that does happen, maybe just have it be another name (but same legacy) on that server. Does anyone like this? BrigandsAuthor
  22. Great idea. I think that it could also be expandible to have comanions be able to sell specific items that you tell them to (weapons, armor, etc.). Even if it were limited to 3 or 5 per trip, id be fine with that! I personally think this would be pretty easy, and should definitely be added! BrigandsAuthor
  23. I do agree that it could use a '(Sarcasm)' mark next to conversation choices here and there. There have been a few times where i have lost affection points a few minutes into a conversation by saying something i didn't mean. In that I definitely agree. BrigandsAuthor
  24. I was thinking about it, and you cant really even make a family out of 16 characters. I have a pretty small family in comparison to others I know, and it still is over 16! Why not have have Legacy span all servers? I know people say that people will just make a bunch of lv 1s that sit on the servers clogging them up, but I thought about it and came up with this: Make it so that characters cannot be activated in Legacy until they finish thier origin world or reach lv 10. Of course, this would be after one character finishes chapter 1. Thanks, BrigandsAuthor
  25. Just thought of something. What if other races (eg. Togruta, Trandoshan, Duros, etc.) were able to be bought through legacy? BrigandsAuthor
×
×
  • Create New...