Read the post above you, though I worry about whether or not it would be able to penetrate your thick skull.

So any boredom you've ever had of a game is your fault, not that of the game itself?

People knew me on my server and vice-versa. This isn't something that magically went "poof." I know it's a romanticized perspective, but you supplant objectivity with subjectivity and expect the flock of anti-WoW players to gather to your banner to validate an opinion as fact. Thankfully cooler heads prevail internally, though you resistant individuals will will never see it because it isn't worth voicing strongly. I'm sure the easy response for you is to argue feebly "why did you respond?" to which I answer, "To help you see clarity."

Not everyone suffers from the same bugs. You invalidate a player based upon some random preset notion of self-importance that you blanket over everyone, but do you really think stating in not-so-subtle terms that players at end game deserve less attention is really warranted? Are you planning on NEVER capping? If so, you could argue this blatantly short-sighted perspective with blissful ignorance, but when time comes for you to experience them I would bet dollars to doughnuts you'll cry bloody murder. So QQ more about the QQ.

For every thread berating this game's flaws I see an equivalent white knight thread such as this.

For all the reasons they outlined in their post?

No, no you were not. Source: top 25 guild in WoW.

Are you sure you understand the terms used in the post you quote? Are you aware of what cognitive dissonance is? The OP is a case and point example of such, whether you want to agree or not.

You doubt people's talk that paints them as programmers and then expect anyone to listen to what you say based upon your own theoretical ONE YEAR spent learning programming? That makes me laugh.

Your argument falls flat in the face of those of us who are loyal to Bioware who simply didn't like the product delivered. Do not assume you can simply blanket everyone with a generalized argument about some "generation shift." This mentality conveniently ignores anyone who has a dissenting opinion in favor of touting devotion. If it is someone's choice to leave quickly who are you to deem it inappropriate?

No. I cannot get engaged in the lack of variety this game has combine with poor combat.

WoW came out 7 years ago. I know that it's REALLY EASY to ignore this BLATANT FACT but it gets very old hearing this same old tired garbage day-in-day-out. You do not compare Xb360/PS3 titles to XB/PS2 titles, and the same standard does not magically disappear now. Get over it.

He has a different experience and has voiced it reasonably well. Because you do not experience a mirrored gameplay experience is in no way a strong justification to deny his voice and lump him in with the drivel. The guy he is responding to has already levied personal attacks, why are you not stamping "TROLL" on him?

Yes, responding with a reasonable assertion to rebut a poor post is certainly a way to validate said poor post's point. You were clever earlier, what happened to that guy?

Do you spend an equal amount of effort berating the "amazing game, thanks BW" posts that are continually springing up for flooding the forums as well? If not, I ask you why not? When you conclude respond, because frankly I interpret your post to mean people who are disappointed should keep it in segregated conversations and those who are not are welcome to post as many threads as they desire.

Your logic is to compare a 7 year-old title with a newly released title. If we adhere to your conclusion we can argue that Star Wars Battlefront: II was absolute garbage because of recent IP released. When you look at it in that light the argument becomes very convoluted.

Are you implying you are returning to WoW?

Endgame content and endgame gear are entirely different. If you cannot see what the OP meant contextually that is not their fault. You are likely old enough and wise enough to make this distinction.

Your post is accurate and well presented on this topic, in particular what I bolded.

That's really not what he said and I think you know this.

Since like takes to like I'll say this: You, the mediocre deviantartist, are now on ignore.

That's because you live life quick. Jon: whichever side you guys play primarily!

We get it, you're an aggressive, ad hominem poster who cares little for discussion. Please move on to another thread/activity.

I just rolled a character. Who am I adding?

As a quick aside I feel compelled to tell you that your signature does not reflect your capability to reason. Please change it as it states a very obvious logical fallacy that I am sure you do not adhere to normally.