yes. pfft carebears.

i think you are forgetting that this game isn't available in china. /thread

nope its not periodic so it does not.

you seem to be taking this rather personally... so i apologise if it helps you feel better.

agree 100%

:):p:D lol

why? i just don't get why you wanted to put it in your video, what was the purpose of saying; "he's the best marauder on my server imo" in your video? - other than to (try &) make him look awesome. why? ...actually i wasn't watching the video for some other player's e-peen stroking, i watched it to see you play to get some more information about vanguard. anyway, like i said call me weird. but i don't like putting people up on a pedestal. probably in error, so i don't bother at all. ^^

as far as i'm aware people prefer to stack crit and surge and after that, power.

i don't rate other players, or consider them the best at anything. since you did it irked me and i thought i would point that out. call me weird.

lol... because this "sayc" guy beat you, you consider him the "best marauder on your server?" haaha, get over yourself mate!

how do you know over 100% accuracy only negates dodge/parry?

Well, personally I don't have many problems with it running well, but It is the people who are running minimum specs that concern me, they aren't getting the performance they they should be getting. That was the general reason for my post.

You are correct it's been heavily modified, which is why I wrote about it in my op. however the game engine itself is fairly crippled by poor performance, it's the nature of the engine. It's not just a flat 1 example accusation, there are other AAA mmo's who have or are using it.. and that other one i mentioned ran even worse than this, but my point is, is its running like this now, after all of 5 years of improvements and modifications by bioware, the engine itself isn't a powerhouse of performance. It's indeed inheritly very slow. And such, having such low minimum specs, is frankly a falsehood, unless people don't care about quality of game experience when they buy the game and expect it to actually be playable when they install it on a minimum spec system.

It's not, only on the fleet when it's very busy, but that is to be be expected. I was referring to the people with low end machines. And that basically minimum spec, as it is currently, is not/barely enough to get a decent gaming experience whatsoever. All it boils down to is this; "do you meet minimum spec? great! - it will actually launch." As for any kind of decent experience from that, really, not going to happen. The minimum specs aren't correct.

Hmm...

nothing?

mirror classes have the same cc.

Why? because it's good at some things and bad at others. What it's good for; creating worlds and enabling devopers to place items in the gameworld and craft it in real time wheile other developers are placing trees, constructing buildings, placing items etc all while logged in and standing next to eachother inside the gameworld, in a live environment. This cuts down on a lot of time and is generally touted for extreme ease of use and flexibility. ...Why it's bad? because the game engine itself runs poorly on generally all systems. Generally speaking the minimal specs for this game are a lie. (in my opinion, based off experience.) Let me just say that I have alpha and beta tested a game that is in development since last year called "prime battle for dominus" now it's just called "dominus". They used the HERO engine exclusively as well, and in places that game was extremly poorly optimized, for instance you could be standing in a cave with a very powerful system such as mine, and get over 400fps 1 second, and it dop down to 30 fps just by turning 10 degrees to the right or left, while staring at a blank cave wall with no other item that required rendering introduced.. so it makes you wonder. What is wrong with this game engine? Well Bioware actually have done a great job getting this frankly ..bad, engine to the state that it's in. It's actually in a playable state, however like I mentioned before i am on a extremely over the recommended specs for the game. Still, to advertise this game currently as minimum specs being correct (that basically boiling down to 5-10 fps.. (unbearable... right), and then to have someone with a minimum spec system (barely, quite possibly) able to launch the game an and play, the game experience is horrendous. Sure, I can understand why, but it did take these people by surprise. I suppsoe they must be new to pc gaming I thought, when they are trying to play the game on a 1ghz Atom notebook. Bioware did modify the HERO engine to run as best as they could given the circumstances and I am sure they are well aware that the engine is going to perform badly on lower end ssytems but it as set in stone I suppose and that excuse, whether it was from Bioware or from the fans about "the game's graphics look date because they want the game to appeal to a wider audience by being able to run on older systems" seems moot at this point since i hve pointed out the inherit flaw in the hero engine. Not saying it's a failure, and since hardware improves over time, in a couple years everyone will be running hex cores and overclocked custom 580's, 590's, 600's.. I suppose then - it won't be a problem. As for now?.. well I think I went over that already. ^^

lol. you do. expect minimal performance with minimal specs. be happy it runs at all.

k go play eq. should last you 5 minutes or so...

use a healer comp like everyone else. "I never thought I would ever say I'm thinking of "canceling my sub" but for the first time I have considered it. " -- annoying & disgust.

you do realise when people dont like any aspect of any game they dont rate it fairly on metacritic right.. ? they give it a 0. or a 1. they dont rate it properly. if they dont like skyrim for instance they dont take into account how good it is, how well made it is, how good the graphics are, etc etc.. as far as they are concerned the entire thing might as well be a used dyper of a videogame. so they rate **** that is actually really good, a 0 or a 1. you know why? ******es is why. never listen to user reviews on metacritic, its the worst place on the internet for legit reviews regarding users.

nvidia 550ti is nothing to scoff at.... trash. Quad core oc'd to 2.8... trash. this game is heavily cpu dependent.

you're all idiots, no one knows the cost.

That's all!